Quantcast

Comments about ‘Readers' forum: Oppose SkiLink’

Return to article »

Published: Saturday, Dec. 10 2011 12:00 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
stevo123
slc, ut

Great letter, Selling public land to a private Canadian Real estate developer is wrong.

Owl
Salt Lake City, UT

The downside risks for Utah are enormous. Seeing how much profit a Canadian company can squeeze out of public land in Utah is something every Utahn should oppose.

Impartial7
DRAPER, UT

Anybody supporting this misguided project must have a financial payout if it's built. None of my skiing friends think this is a good idea.

Thinkin\' Man
Rexburg, ID

No one has yet made an objectively valid, substantial reason the ski link should not be built. Its impacts on the land are minimal and unimportant.

International owners are common in U.S. businesses and properties. So what?

Anecdotal "my skiing friends" is not a meaningful sampling of public opinion.

Build it!

Grover
Salt Lake City, UT

"Selling public land to a Canadian real estate developer is wrong". Hey you forgot to mention that they have National Health insurance and are socialists too!

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments