Quantcast

Comments about ‘Nelson looks sharp in 1st game back’

Return to article »

Published: Sunday, Dec. 4 2011 1:25 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Common-Tator
Saint Paul, MN

I was quite grateful for the outcome, and on the surface, the stats look very impressive. However, while watching the game, I would have to disagree with the headline selected for this article. Large yardage totals notwithstanding, Nelson did not look sharp.

Bless the announcers, who seem to always go with the flow of the outcome rather than analyze what actually happened. I could easily have seen them flailing at Nelson for throwing the ill-advised pass while falling to the turf as he was being tackled by two Warriors, that ... floated into Cougar hands for a drive-saving first down (I was waiting for the "pick"!) Riley missed a number of wide-open receivers on medium length passes, and his long passes were regularly under thrown. The "YAC" was huge in the total.

Riley was understandably reticent to run, compared with his pre-injury games ... thus negating his perceived "advantage" over Jake Heaps. The Warriors stuffed most all Cougar attempts to run early in the game. While we'll never know, it would have been interesting to see how the traditional pro-style passer with a rocket arm would have fared against a defense extremely vulnerable to the pass.

bballjunkie
Pleasant Grove, UT

"Nelson looks sharp in 1st game back"

I would hope so that was one of the worst teams I have watched this year (but still not as bad as the BUFFS, hey ute fan). Or should I be like most BYU fans... Riley is the greatest QB, and we would not have the record today with out him. lol, we have nothing to be thrilled about, happy yes, thrilled no.

TJ
Eagle Mountain, UT

Nelson did look very good. BYU ofense moved the ball well in the first half but weren't consistent. They literally blew Hawaii off the field in the second half. It was a blast to watch.

nothegame
Saratoga Springs, UT

I'M a Ute fan but love to watch Nelson play, wish we had a QB.

AribaD
Spanish Fork, UT

When it come right down to it, football is just entertainment and Riley Nelson is pure entertainment. He is much more fun to watch than Heeps.

Duckhunter
Highland, UT

There will always be those that are unsatisfied regardless of the otucome of the game. They will find things to criticize such as their preference for another player who didn't play, or the play calling, or a particular play, etc.

Personally all I care about is winning. That is it. Win the game. I do not care if the qb throws for 300+ yds and multiple td's. I do not care if the defense pitches a shutout. I do not care about anything other than winning. That is what I like, winning.

Veracity
Morgan, UT

Hail Mary!

Riley reminds me of a Bowl Game in the past...Everything he throws up is a "Hail Mary" pass

BYU I hope learns from Utah...when Riley gets hurt because of his ad-lib playing, you better have a back up ready...which you do not.

BlueHusky
Mission Viejo, CA

Nelson is a gamer. Just as Tebow is not a prototypical NFL QB, but who raises the level of his team's play. Nelson raises the level of the team's play. And he is a good passer with a decent arm - better than Tebow actually.

I remember the same criticisms directed at Steve Young, too. Pure passers like, Linert et al. are great, but Nelson and Tebow create a different dimension. Load up for the run, Nelson passes. Nelson is great on the underneath routes, but can throw long enough to complete a few big plays too.

I hope Heaps redshirts next year, but if he transfers, so be it. Bronco has to start Nelson unless he gets hurt or doesn't get a haircut.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments