Ive often lamented that my experience with BYU could never be repeated. I was 3
months away from completing a 4 year stint with the USAF when I began meeting
with two Elders in the home of my immediate supervisor. I was baptized a few
weeks later. In May or June my Bishop asked me if I would like to go to college.
It was the first time that was ever mentioned to me. I grew up as a child of an
illiterate Appalachian coal miner. Neither of my parents could read. All of my
uncles were coal miners. I was surrounded with cousins who dropped out of
school before high school. I never took the SAT or ACT. Yet the Bishop offered
to help get me accepted at BYU. I was placed on academic probation after the
first semester. My biggest challenge was the culture shock. My grades improved
slightly the next semester. I went on a mission and came back to graduate. Later
I earned a Masters and PhD. It is good to see BYU-I willing to help others
travel a road, however rocky, that they may never have entered otherwise.
Re:FDRfanGreat story! So that is what the American Dream is all about,
that every child has the opportunity to reach their full potential. It often
involves being in the right place at the right time-a stroke of luck-and someone
offering encouragement and support. Congratulations for all you've
accomplished. Very interesting article. One question I have
is are these teaching methods used in all sizes of classes, including classes
with 200 students?
Oh, that the state of Utah would sit up and take notice. It currently costs more
to take an online class at USU (and probably other state universities) than it
does to sit in the classroom. They could serve more people by following BYU-I's
Eaton notes that one of the cost savings in online classes is not offering
benefits to those remote instructors. Many such adjunct instructors cobble
together a "career" by teaching part-time for several different
institutions and getting benefits from none of them. I don't know
all the details, of course, but I wonder if BYU-I isn't balancing some of its
budget on the backs of under-paid, over-worked part-timers who also have
families and hopes for a higher standard of living. The question of
how to use (or not use) adjunct labor is a vexed and vexing one in higher
education. I hope BYU-I has done its homework in not adding to that problem.
Hilarious caption, DN.
cldstar,I am one of the remote adjunct instructors at BYU-I. Before
I started this work at BYU-I, I had a full-time job and a masters degree that my
full-time job didn't require. I'm still working full-time and work at BYU-I part
time, and enjoy every minute of it as I'm able to use my degree and interact
with students who are anxious to learn. The supplementary pay is nice, I must
admit, but even more so is the ability to use what I've learned in a way I'm not
able to at my full-time job. I love both jobs, but for different reasons. I'm
grateful BYU-I offers this kind of adjunct teaching to let people like me make
contributions outside our full-time work.
That kind of teaching is walking a fine line between brilliance and
incompetence. Frankly, I don't think there are very many professors who are
talented enough to pull it off. I had a professor who believed strongly that
students should teach themselves and then everybody came to class to talk about
it. With students learning it on their own and then trying to discuss it, it was
the blind leading the blind and nobody did well on the department wide
assessment exam. The Socratic method may work well with very bright and
motivated law students, but for courses in engineering, mathematics, economics,
or physics, formal instruction from the professor definitely needs to take place
as there are difficult technical skills that need to be mastered. By the way, my
professor was fired. He didn't do a thing but direct discussion in class. There
were tons of complaints to the Dean and nobody learned a thing. Some subjects
can be self-taught and others need a professor to teach them. While I am
impressed with a lot of the innovation going on at BYUI and their willingness to
try new things, I think they have probably taken it too far.
Another enlightening article! Visionaries are for real!
Way to go! Someone has to lead us out of the Status Quo nonsense that education
has become.BYU-I looks to be setting precedent for the future of
learning. I would rather have my kids go there than some other
college that costs more but only cares about their "party college
@MisterFweemI'm delighted that the adjunct situation is working so
well for you. It sounds wonderful. The case of a person with a career (or at
least a job with benefits) taking on the distance education position is really
the best of both worlds, it seems to me. I'm very happy for you and others like
you. I guess I'm concerned about the potential for abuse in the
part-time system. In the academic department where I teach, there are many
adjunct instructors who barely make ends meet because my department doesn't pay
a living wage and doesn't offer any type of benefits. Shame on us, right?
Right.If BYU-I isn't doing similar, then kudos to them. Really.
The Lord continues his work in the most mysterious ways.
BYU Idaho - I know of one and only one reason why kids go there and that is to
find a mate. The college experience is more akin to on-line dating sites than
Patriot - I assure you that the reason my daughter attends BYU-I is to gain a
education. She pays her own way and works hard when she is off track to pay for
her education. Your comment that the only reason one attends BYU-I is to
"find a mate" is stero typical and way off base.
common sense in Idaho | 1:24 p.m. Oct. 17, 2011Pocatello, Id I
find nothing typical in patriot's comment. Ask your self why some one would make
that kind of comment.
@ Patriot, do you really mean what you wrote? @ Max, lots of people
share your concern that the BYU-Idaho Learning Model is the bling leading the
blind. But in reality, that's not how things work at all! I don't think you
can really appreciate how remarkably well the Learning Model works unless you
attend a class where it is being used. You come away feeling you have been part
of a truly special learning experience. And it does take a lot of talent by the
instructors to make the Learning Model work, and BYU-Idaho has invested heavily
in helping the faculty adapt to this new way of teaching.
FDRFAN - To answer your question I have asked myself and see no reason that
anyone would make that kind of statement. But I disagree with you. I
think it is a very typical statement. Everyone going to college just to get
their mate. It's not true in my daughters case. Now maybe she will find her
life's partner there. But it is not why she went to college.
Patriot is living in the past. BYUI is a legitimate higher ed institution and
is changing the paradigm and mindset for post-secondary ed. Students who cannot
go to the church's flagship school can count on a first-rate experience at a
reasonable cost, and still experience the unique atmosphere that previously was
not available outside of BYU-Provo, at least not in the same way. BYUI has
carved out a unique value proposition and place for itself in higher ed. It is
clearly differentiated from the typical state school and/or community college.
And it is blazing trails that more secular schools are looking at closely to
solve some vexing problems. Not every college/university needs to try and
compete on the research side. Some can simply teach fundamentals to undergrads.
Kudos to BYUI for doing it in a way that is unique to its mission.
A couple of ideas none of the suits will every read-1. If pathways
is so wonderful, why don't they shut down the physical BYU-I campus and supply a
laptop with online tuition? The church could serve every LDS kid in the world
for just a few nickels, the kids could just stay home, and nobody would have to
deal with Rexburg winters.2. If the church should consolidate all
of the redundant undergraduate programs? BYU, BYU-I, BYU-H, and LDS Business
College all offer most of the same programs. All business majors should attend
BYU. All education majors should attend BYU-I, ect. Case in point, the top
"Two" Horticulture programs in the country are at BYU AND BYU-I. Why
should the church maintain two sets of faculties and facilities when, they could
consolidate and have a single program?3. The church should cease
all grad programs and, instead encourage undergrads to transfer to
"gentile" institutions for "In The World" educational
opportunities.4. Lastly, Since the church has such a wonderful
Institute Program across the country, why do we need any Universities?
As a college teacher with 35 years of experience, I have found that
appropriately designed on-line courses provide much better learning than sitting
in classrooms with many other students. BYU-I is on the right track,
accomplishing much in a short time, and the future will only get better.
Adjunct teachers should ideally be working in "real life" jobs where
their experience counts for much in providing a useful education. Those who try
to "cobble together" a living by teaching only adjunct classes should
consider other alternatives to providing themselves and their families a
living.I wonder if anyone is aware if the school has Institute
classes which are taught on-line; there are many students in remote areas (such
as Eastern Canada where we are serving a senior mission) who don't have access
to a high quality Institute experience and for whom this would be a great
Part 3: BYU Idaho: On the way from montana to Nevada.
Can anyone explain the graph showing an very slight increase in "global
rating"? What is the significance? Also I have highly enjoyed
reading this series of articles. I am a high school teacher hoping to get out
of a stagnant status quo and be progressive. I'm looking for inspiration and
direction, not just the next fad.
The BYU Idaho story should be a Harvard Business School case study.And, the foundation for totally rethinking how education takes place in this
country, including K-12.Bravo to everyone concerned with this
Re: "The Socratic method may work well with very bright and motivated law
students . . . ."So many elitist assumptions, so little time
[and space].Let me just say it sounds like an educators' trade union
speaking. Not an actual living, breathing, thinking, aspiring person.
Patriot,If the only reason kids go there is to get married, I want
my money back! I have 30+ kid who went there for 2 years and is not married and
a 27+ kid who went there for 5 years and is not married. Both now have great
jobs. My kid who went there for 2 years transferred to BYU and felt the teachers
at BYU-I were great and loved his experience there.
I've been following the Pathway program for a couple years now and have lost
hope that they will ever offer it nearby.