Quantcast

Comments about ‘Ted Bundy DNA may link killer to cold cases’

Return to article »

Published: Monday, Aug. 1 2011 9:04 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Eliot
Santaquin, UT

The number of cases solved by DNA typing increases as the power of DNA is recognized in the legal community. The OJ Simpson case taught us that proper standards are needed to insure accuracy and reliability of DNA data. The standards for DNA forensic testing have been developed by the Applied Genetics Group at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Readers may be interested to know that the leader of that group is a BYU graduate, John Butler, who has made several presentations at BYU education week. With the number of stories related to DNA testing appearing in the newspaper of late, perhaps the Deseret News would be interested in a story about Dr. Butler and his group at NIST. He will be speaking at BYU in November.

WPLyon
NORTH SALT LAKE, UT

The real world of police work is not like television's Cold Case Files or CSI Miami, as Bundy was executed in 1989 and only now are they analyzing his DNA to upload it to the FBI's data base. The parents of this little girl might have wanted to know as others may as well.

I hope that family at least will gain some closure if Bundy was the murderer.

gem2477
Layton, UT

I think he killed the girl when he was 15 - the way she disappeared and was murdered is consistant with Bundy's later years.

MoJules
Florissant, MO

Such a sad person he is, I would follow the DNA rather then believe him, if he is capable of so many murders, he is capable of lying to this girls parents. I felt back before he was executed that he lied to them, just to be a jerk.

giantfan
Farmington, UT

Re: MoJules,

I agree with you that he lied about it but not so much "to be a jerk". He was proud of all his murders, except this one. As a psychopath, Bundy didn't feel a lot of guilt about killing young women, which is why he, in the end, readily confessed to so many of them with no remorse. I believe he felt guilty about killing Ann Marie for two reasons: 1) because she was so young and 2) it was likely his first murder. I don't think he was particularly proud of who he was--even though he was proud of how cleverly he was able to seduce and subdue his victims and conceal the evidence--and the killing Ann Marie Burr was likely the start of it all.

OnlyInUtah
Cottonwood Heights, UT

And to think that it all began with his casual viewing of pornography.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments