Comments about ‘Term 'national debt' misleads country's finances’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Business
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Stalled job growth rattles U.S. economy
- Around world, Bloomberg soda war hard to swallow
- Crazy classifieds: Decorative weapons,...
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large sodas...
- KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
Most Commented
Across Site
In Business
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Couple can't retire because of $116,000...
19 - Stalled job growth rattles U.S. economy
10 - U.S. economy added 69,000 jobs in May,...
8 - Oil prices drop; will gas follow?
8 - Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake...
8 - Health care costs rose more than inflation
5 - Around world, Bloomberg soda war hard...
4






There are a few disingenuous statements in this story. While I agree that we probably don't need to count the money that is owed between different entities of the federal government, saying that we shouldn't count the money that the government owes to citizens is ridiculous. I fully expect the government to repay all the bonds that I own. I will very much be affected if they don't. This money is a legitimate part of the national debt.
The argument that we should consider assets is legitimate, but misleading. We are not talking about net worth. We are talking about living within our income. It is fine to have assets to sell, but the fundamental problem is spending. If we don't fix that we still have the problem.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments