Published: Sunday, July 17 2011 12:00 a.m. MDT
Couldn't agree with Kathleen Parker more. And I would put Grover Norquist's
Pledge (that all Republican members of the House have signed) at the top of the
list of dumb things to have signed.
Here, here! It's not surprising that Jon Huntsman rejected this pledge (as he
does all others), but I was happy to hear that Mitt Romney also refused to
kowtow to this group. Also not surprising is the fact that Michele Bachman DID
sign it -- even before the controversial slavery portion was excised. After all,
this is the woman who thinks it's a good idea to abolish the Environmental
Republicans need to get out of the bedroom and into the budget meeting.
The only pledge one should take is the peldge of alliegence.
I don't always agree with you, Kathleen, but on this issue, we are in agreement.
@Voice of ReasonI fail to see how a ban on same-sex marriage will
help "those struggling with SSA, my own children, and myself." Addicts will do what they do regardless of the law (homosexuality itself
is not banned, only the marriage). I myself am not gay, and as such, the
temptation to act as such is non existant (maybe I just like girls too much).
As for my children, I cannot see it harming them anymore than alcohol. If I
teach them right, then what they do is on their own conscience as an adult. I failed to see "where soon children - my children if I lived there
- will be indoctrinated with the lie that homosexuality harms no one" in
the article posted the other day. All it said was that schools were to teach
Gay history. To claim this is somehow indoctrination is like claiming teaching
about 1930's Europe is an endorsement of Nazism. Not true.
Well written, Ms. Parker. And good point that it would be superfluous for
Romney and Huntsman to sign such a pledge as per their already membership in a
religion of family fidelity.
The oath of office contains a pledge to uphold the Constitution. That is all
that should be required of anyone seeking public office. Those who make
extraneous pledges to special interest groups are needlessly tying their own
hands for the sake of pandering to an extremist base, which will use the pledge
as a bludgeon to keep the pledgees in line. The result is that the pledgees
become beholden to a special interest group, which makes one wonder who is
really in charge of leading the country, and whose freedom has been compromised.
What is even more galling is the implied threat from these fringe
groups to blackball and defeat those who don't knuckle under, falsely imputing
lack of commitment to one principle or another. Bravo for the
courage of every candidate who shuns pledges, and shame on those who succumb to
the pressure, as well as those who apply such pressure.
Mormons are accustomed to rejecting creeds by which others require to define
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.— About comments