Quantcast

Comments about ‘Kathleen Parker: Thank you, Mitt and Jon, for rejecting the 'pledge'’

Return to article »

Published: Sunday, July 17 2011 12:00 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
The Taxman
Los Angeles, CA

Couldn't agree with Kathleen Parker more. And I would put Grover Norquist's Pledge (that all Republican members of the House have signed) at the top of the list of dumb things to have signed.

PressureDrop
Provo, UT

Here, here! It's not surprising that Jon Huntsman rejected this pledge (as he does all others), but I was happy to hear that Mitt Romney also refused to kowtow to this group. Also not surprising is the fact that Michele Bachman DID sign it -- even before the controversial slavery portion was excised. After all, this is the woman who thinks it's a good idea to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency!

Hutterite
American Fork, UT

Republicans need to get out of the bedroom and into the budget meeting.

Pagan
Salt Lake City, UT

The only pledge one should take is the peldge of alliegence.

RanchHand
Huntsville, UT

I don't always agree with you, Kathleen, but on this issue, we are in agreement.

Darrel
Eagle Mountain, UT

@Voice of Reason

I fail to see how a ban on same-sex marriage will help "those struggling with SSA, my own children, and myself."

Addicts will do what they do regardless of the law (homosexuality itself is not banned, only the marriage). I myself am not gay, and as such, the temptation to act as such is non existant (maybe I just like girls too much). As for my children, I cannot see it harming them anymore than alcohol. If I teach them right, then what they do is on their own conscience as an adult.

I failed to see "where soon children - my children if I lived there - will be indoctrinated with the lie that homosexuality harms no one" in the article posted the other day. All it said was that schools were to teach Gay history. To claim this is somehow indoctrination is like claiming teaching about 1930's Europe is an endorsement of Nazism. Not true.

Herbal Tea Partier
Kearns, UT

Well written, Ms. Parker. And good point that it would be superfluous for Romney and Huntsman to sign such a pledge as per their already membership in a religion of family fidelity.

Curmudgeon
Salt Lake City, UT

The oath of office contains a pledge to uphold the Constitution. That is all that should be required of anyone seeking public office. Those who make extraneous pledges to special interest groups are needlessly tying their own hands for the sake of pandering to an extremist base, which will use the pledge as a bludgeon to keep the pledgees in line. The result is that the pledgees become beholden to a special interest group, which makes one wonder who is really in charge of leading the country, and whose freedom has been compromised.

What is even more galling is the implied threat from these fringe groups to blackball and defeat those who don't knuckle under, falsely imputing lack of commitment to one principle or another.

Bravo for the courage of every candidate who shuns pledges, and shame on those who succumb to the pressure, as well as those who apply such pressure.

raybies
Layton, UT

Mormons are accustomed to rejecting creeds by which others require to define one's values.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments