Quantcast

Comments about ‘Texas Rep. Ron Paul retires from Congress’

Return to article »

Published: Tuesday, July 12 2011 11:22 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Pagan
Salt Lake City, UT

Don't leave angry...

just leave!

MonkeySpider
Lindon, ut

Pagan

Wow, you have some hate for Ron Paul much? He is a true patriot and constitutionalist! MSM does a lot to try and keep Dr. Paul and his policies in the dark from Americans. If you did real research on Dr Paul, you would see that he is the Best chance American has to get back on track. I would love to hear your arguments on why he wouldn't be good?

DCUte
Draper, UT

It's probably best that Ron Paul retire from Congress.

He's so focused on running for President now that he rarely attends committee meetings and frequently misses floor votes.

I admire him for vacating the seat and letting it be filled by someone who actually cares about being a Member of Congress.

MonkeySpider
Lindon, ut

Pagan

His party. That's your reasoning? The Republican Party has completely lost its track, you always bring up the past and I usually agree, the republican party has done a lot do destroy our country. Ron Paul wants to withdraw all of our foreign troops, cut spending, audit and abolish the federal reserve, abolish TSA and the Patriot Act. If he thought he had a shot at winning under Independent then he would run Independent but he knows that the only way to win is with the Republican nomination. So Ill ask again, what about RON PAUL's policies don't you like? Not the republican parties policies, I'm talking about Ron Paul.

Be Practical
Sandy, UT

"He said he's received more support for his 2012 presidential bid than any before, and that he wants to concentrate exclusively on that race."

Let's see, he wants to serve out his term through December 2012 and then concentrate exclusively on his his presidential election campaign which, at the latest, will be over and done with in November 2012? What am I missing here?

MonkeySpider
Lindon, ut

Pagen

I guess they are blocking my comments back, anyways, what facts did you present to the question I asked? You lumped Ron Paul in with all republicans, if you viewed his voting record you would notice that it hasn't changed in over 30 years! He wants to withdraw all of our foreign troops, audit and abolish the Federal Reserve, abolish the TSA, cut spending and reduce debt, abolish the IRS. He would run independent if he thought he could win as an independent but he knows that he needs the republican nomination to win. What's bad about Ron Paul and his policies? Let me remind you that we are talking about Ron Paul, not all republicans....

williary
Kearns, UT

I disagree with Paul on quite a few issues, but I'll give him a huge amount of credit for being consistent. You've got two-faced Republicans right now like Cantor claiming that just voting for a raise in the debt ceiling is a huge compromise for his Republicans. While they all voted 7 times to raise the limit under W. I believe Paul did not vote for any of those raises, so kudos for him to being true to his word, not just playing dangerous political games that they will hope lead to America failing.

owlmaster2
Kaysville, UT

I'm glad to see Ron Paul retire.
He has served honorable and it is time. I didn't agree with his votes or most of what he sponsored but I do feel he was totally sincere in what he did. That is worth something.

I am curious why Monkey Spider finds it necessary to attack Pagan anytime Pagan posts. Is there some kind of delight Spider gets from his attempts to demean Pagan??

This article was about the retirement of Rep Ron Paul. Not Pagan.

MonkeySpider
Lindon, ut

owlmaster2

How am I attacking or demeaning pagan? What pagan said made it seem like Ron Paul is a bad politician, and I take offense to that considering that Ron Paul is one of the only men in office that really has American citizens best interests at heart. His policies and voting record show that, and I was just asking Pagan why he doesn't like Ron Paul, and his answer was regarding republicans NOT Ron Paul, so I asked again and have yet to get a response, I don't think I was attacking or demeaning at all.

VST
Bountiful, UT

@Pagan,

I would suggest you need to give up on quoting about Christie's state police helicopter ride to his son's baseball game with regards to wasting the taxpayer's money. Christie's paid for the cost of the ride ($2,100) out of his own pocket.

mark
Salt Lake City, UT

Yeah, VST, Christie paid for it - after people criticized the joy ride.

awsomeron1
Oahu, HI

Good Now we can elect Ru Paul who would get just as many votes.

Howard Beal
Provo, UT

Pagan/Pagen:

Sometimes I actually agree with your posts. But on this one you have made one grave error. By lumping Ron Paul with all the (R's), you failed to realize that he has been opposed to US be any of these wars, quite opposed. Yes Paul does have an (R) by his name in regards to his affiliation but often goes against his own party, especially in regards to foreign intervention. Paul is probably the one (R) that is closest to be a Libertarian. That's why I like Ron Paul, he makes those Republican presidential debates lively and by having absolutely no chance of winning he can just about say anything!

MoJules
Florissant, MO

I pulled this off of wikipedia. "He has gained prominence for his libertarian positions on many political issues, often clashing with both Republican and Democratic Party leaders. Paul has run for President of the United States twice before, first in 1988 as the nominee of the Libertarian Party and again in 2008 as a candidate for the Republican nomination." Ron Paul may run on the Republican ticket but he is more a Libertarian. There are things I like about him, things I don't. He is for much smaller government, as a Libertarian, but sometimes he is too extreme and sometimes he just says things that have nothing to do with what is being said. But I watch him every week sing in the Tabernacle Choir ;)

Madden
Herriman, UT

I voted for Ron Paul last time, will do it again.

Those who try to rip the guy because of his party don't get it...he is NOTHING like the GOP. If the Libertarians lost a few of their more extreme positions, they would become the new and improved GOP, led by a person like Ron Paul. He is one of the few who tried to reign in his party and push them a better direction. How can you hate that (other than the fact that he pushed but ultimately failed)?

He lacks the "charismatic leader" persona, but as an honorable man and a though leader on practical matters in the US, he is fantastic.

DonO
Draper, UT

Ron Paul has no chance of becoming president and had only a slightly better chance of being re-elected to Congress. He had a very tough intra-party opponent in his Texas district who doubtless would have cleaned his clock. He doubtless saw the proverbial writing on the wall and decided to quit on his own terms rather than suffering the humiliating defeat as an incumbent. (Other Incumbents should take note.)

DCUte
Draper, UT

While I'm not personally Rep. Paul's biggest fan, I definitely think we need more public officials who are willing to question the status quo and think "outside the box," like him.

I wish him the best on his campaign and in retirement and am grateful for his honorable (scandal-free) service.

Led Zeppelin II
Bountiful, UT

@Pagan. Ron Paul wants to legalize doobies. I cant see you disagreeing with that. I do not do drugs. Never have. I think all illegal drugs and even too many prescription drugs are stupid. But if legalizing drugs come with legalizing the Constitution and freedom why not? I will support Ron Paul.

Riles
Midway, UT

Let's see...

- Anti-intervention (so, by definition, anti-offensive war & anti-tax)
- Historically consistent - a 30 year track record of principled voting
- Pro-constitution (so, by definition, pro civil rights)
- Anti-abortion - with experience as an obstetrician to inform his views
- Anti-Federal Reserve and its wealth-destroying currency manipulation
- Voted against Iraq, bailouts, QE1, QE2, challenges his own party
- Anti-corporatist: detests all inequality in the application of laws
- Military veteran who supports a strong defense
- Lifelong Christian married for 50+ years to same woman, no scandals

What more do you want from a candidate? I seriously don't understand what people have against this guy. He promotes every freedom imaginable (speech, association, right to bear arms, free market) and has demonstrated his commitment to constitutional principles while remaining unflappable in the face of 30 years of corporate lobbying. Here is a guy who could bring all sides together like no one before him because his message is popular...

liberty for all.

All voters who take seriously the privilege of participating in the democratic process owe it to themselves and others to learn about this man.

Aggie238
Logan, UT

I'm sure I don't agree with EVERYTHING Ron Paul supports, but even given what little I know about him he seems to be an honorable man who is committed to the basic principles of freedom. I do need to do some more research on him, but out of the choices so far, he'll most likely be the one to get my vote. I'm certainly not voting for Romney, Huntsman, Palin, Huckabee, Trump, or anyone else that has been talked about in recent weeks.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments