Such a shame that they have to not only go through the process to prove the
date, but they also have to prove that it is authentic. What a waste of time
for people to make a mockery of things that are old and unique. I see this when
watching Pawn Stars, there are some very well thought out forgeries or
reproduction of something and making it to look old.
I don't know why this find is so shocking. We already know that men lived in
America 20,000 years ago and there is evidence that humans were here 60,000
years ago. Scientists still think humans started out in Africa between 60,000
and 80,000 years ago, but the next find could change their minds. Could it be
possible that Joseph Smith was right and that Adam lived in North America?
Google the following key words:Topper, oldest, evidence, man,
western, hemisphere, savannahClick on the first result.
Is there anyone out there who still believes in an 8,000 or so year old earth?
There are many OT stories that stretch logic beyond it's limits. But I can't
imagine what one must have to do to their brain to actually believe that man and
all other forms of life first came into existense less than 10,000 years ago.
"Is there anyone out there who still believes in an 8,000 or so year old
earth?"Idaho Coug:This world was created using
materials that existed already for millions or maybe billions of years. God
brought existing materials together for purposes of this particular world. God
has worlds "without number" that have "come and gone". And we think we invented re-cycling.
Oldschool: not a chanceIdaho Coug: I'm with you. Tom in CA: you wish
it was that easy to explain away.
Seems the Archeologists need a field trip to La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles.
Hundreds of ancient mastodon fossils (not mammoths) at La Brea as well as horses
and camels that also are not to have existed until after the Spaniards.
The artistic perspective of the image seems far too advanced for 13,000 years
ago. Look at art from the medieval ages. Even they couldn't depict
3-dimensions as well as this 'stone-age' example.
"Tom in CA: you wish it was that easy to explain away."ET
Bass: - Let's hear your version.
Cureloms and Cumoms! Yay!
Just what I was thinking, raybies. We know the Jaredites had elephants, so why
not those other unidentified but useful beasties?As for the age of
the Earth, a year is a figure of speech. There is no end to matter, energy, or
space, and it isn't only the "Kolob" hymn that says so. Science says
so too. If scientific methods seem to show certain materials or objects being
billions, millions, or 13,000 years old, it's because the matter they are made
of and the energy that acted upon it has been around that long.
I think it's an exciting find. What impressed me most about it, though, was the
artist had such a lifelike feel for the animal he was drawing. When I look at
it I get a sense of the heartfelt connection between man and animal, hunter and
hunted. Those people back then were connected to the natural world in a deep
sense few people today ever experience anymore. Many people today feel so
disconnected from the earth and the animals, and from their inner selves also as
a result. Those people back then did not have the technology we do, but they
lived life more fully than most of us ever do, because they lived it in
communion with everything around them.