Comments about ‘Nasty override session won't leave any lasting marks’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- Save the Colorado River
- Letter: The question of morality in gay...
- Letter: Help individuals, but stop...
- In our opinion: Editorial: A football playoff
- Letter: Middle class workers are real job...
- Letter: Two junior senators would spell...
- What others say: The winners and the losers
- Lois M. Collins: Don't think your...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- My view: Adjusting the definition of...
54 - Letter: Job creation should be a top...
41 - Letter: Health and health care
36 - Letter: Remember, Howell is still in...
33 - Letter: The question of morality in gay...
31 - Letter: Help individuals, but stop...
28 - Letter: Hatch is an ace
27 - Letter: Enough class warfare
26






"Who was hurt, and who was helped?"
Whenever there is on of these contentious political fights, there's always some debate as to who was the 'winner'. Unfortunately, finding the loser is not difficult. It is the taxpayer. According to John Florez's column from yesterday, holding this special session cost us an extra $30,000 dollars. I know that $30,000 is such a small portion of the budget that it probably shouldn't be worried about, but my point is just that it seems like the fewer days our State Legislature is in session, the less damage they can do. Until we get robust dialogue in the State House and Senate, most of their work will continue to focus on completely ignoring the public interest, and symbolic power grabs.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments