Quantcast
Utah

Rally: Most homeowners who experience foreclosure are 'victims'

Comments

Return To Article
  • A Guy With A Brain Enid, OK
    April 20, 2011 11:53 p.m.

    ALL these foreclosures are the fault of only the banks?

    Really?

    I totally agree that navigating the mortgage/closing process is a confusing pain the rear end and, no, I don't claim to understand every part of it and, yes, I do think banks loaned waaaaaay too much money to people who never should have tried buying a home.

    However, I DO know how to figure an interest rate and what that monthly payment will be and I'm smart enough to know I also need to add taxes and insurance to that monthly payment.

    And, oh yeah, I know how to figure my monthly expenses and add all of them up to see if I 'really' can afford that nice, new home.

    They are ONLY 'victims?'

    Only victims of not using their brains....

  • Houdini Dallas, TX
    April 21, 2011 12:43 a.m.

    Place the blame on someone else. That's the American way.

    I feel for those who have lost their jobs. But part of buying a house is buying within your means in case of a rainy day. If you don't have savings put away, maybe you shouldn't be buying in the first place. People have lost jobs since the beginning and held on to their houses. Yes their are those whose circumstances would have lost their house no matter what but they are the minority here.

    Most people who are losing their homes are those who bought way too much house and now that can't afford it. They are not in the minority. They signed adjustable mortgage loans so they could qualify for the loan. The smart money is to buy a house you can afford on a fixed loan so you know your future no matter what happens to the financial sector. Since when does a family of four need a 4,000 sq foot home with all the upgrades? They would fit nicely in a 1,300 sq. foot house with a payment at the fraction of what they are paying.

  • DogsBarking Provo, UT
    April 21, 2011 5:34 a.m.

    The taxpayer is the victim for having to bail these people out. You don't try to get something for nothing and most of these people tried to get a home way over and beyond what they could ever pay for. I don't feel sorry for them, I despise them and their gluttony.

  • DN Subscriber Cottonwood Heights, UT
    April 21, 2011 6:13 a.m.

    Foreclosure is only the fault of people who fail to pay their mortgages. A few may be truly unfortunate types who have lost jobs.

    However, most probably made a very small down payment; bought the most expensive house they could; save very little money for emergencies; and generally live a lifestyle above what they can afford.

    Just like Congress.

    The only cure is for people to stop buying stuff they can not afford, even if it means continuing to rent, or living in a smaller, less expensive house, and driving and older, cheaper car.

    There are indeed other victims, but not the ones cited in the story. How about all the depositors (those are people who save money and their bank or credit union loans it out to other people for mortgages or cars) who will get little or nothing in the interest they expected for the use of their money by the foreclosure "victims?"

    Too bad that massive federal spending on counseling jobs ran out, but we cannot afford it any more. Just turn your radio on and listen to Save Ramsey or Clark Howard, and 90% of the "victims" could avoid foreclosure.

  • My2Cents Kearns, UT
    April 21, 2011 6:44 a.m.

    For the uninformed, these people are not trying to avoid their obligations and debts, the banks and mortgages companies are unwilling to cooperate and work with any refinancing plans and forcing foreclosures.

    Most mortgage companies and bank card companies are held in off shore accounts that cannot be contacted or reasoned with. Many times a property or mortgage or credit debt has been subdivided among many creditors rather than a single contract holder. When there are multiple parties having separate claims to a debt its impossible to locate them or know who they are. Not even third party collection companies know all the information.

    There is an easy method to see just how vast and diversified debt is in the US, try and find the contact holder of in-store credit cards or large bank credit cards contracts. When you reach the shores of England and other foreign banks you hit a dead end and no information. This is what these people have encountered.

  • Goet Ogden, UT
    April 21, 2011 7:08 a.m.

    Isn't Utah one of the states with the highest square footage per home?

    Guess all that greed is coming home to roost. Stop blaming others for your shortcomings!

  • Mountanman Hayden, ID
    April 21, 2011 7:10 a.m.

    This is what the entitlement mentality produces; Other people must pay for my living beyond my means, if not I am a victim of other people's greed!

  • basstacklegirl Burley, ID
    April 21, 2011 7:57 a.m.

    What it sounds like to me, is you all have great comfortable jobs and have never suffered from job loss or a major medical emergency. You are jumping to conclusions that are greatly judgmental! I am glad you don't hold my mortgage note. There are those who do purchase more than they need but they are in the minority. Get off your high horse and put yourself in someone else's shoes for a day, a week, a month or even a year. It is only through generosity of family that we were able to keep our home. Now that we are employed again we are able to make all our payments. Good people have bad things happen to them even if they think they are well prepared.

  • Really??? Kearns, UT
    April 21, 2011 8:02 a.m.

    Most people who are going through foreclosures are not looking for somebody to take care of their situation. They want to meet their payment obligations. I had to deal with a mortgage company for over a year who claimed I missed a payment in December 2009. The crazy thing is I had arranged automatic payments through my checking account. I had records that the money went to the mortgage company. They would not accept that. I spent 12 months working on getting this fixed. The only solution I found was to get a home loan modification--it turned out I was qualified for the reduction. The mortgage company kept on "losing" papers throughout the process. It is a good thing I kept a good paper trail going, otherwise they would not have followed through on their obligations. I have heard horror stories worse than mine. The mortgage companies are creating bigger messes than solutions.

  • Independence Sandy, UT
    April 21, 2011 8:28 a.m.

    Although I sympathize with those going through foreclosure it is not the end of the world for them. Some people are clueless when it comes to financial matters. There is always a risk that one will lose their job. A wise person will factor that into their financial plan. Second, there are only a few cases of "predatory lending" in UT unless one's definition is any loan that the borrower subsequently defaults on. Third, the mortgage industry is one of the most heavily regulated industries in the nation. Try to get a license to be a mortgage broker and you will see why there are only 3000 of them when there used to be 12,000.

  • Lifelong Republican Orem, UT
    April 21, 2011 8:42 a.m.

    I feel sorry for the folks in this situation. But don't go crying "victim".

    It will do yourself no good and people will only grow to resent you.

    It is tough to lose a job but when you do, you have to be ready to make do.

    I once sold my home to stay out of debt when times were tough. It wasn't easy but we made it through and came out better in the long run.

    A house is just a building, a home is where you live.

  • Lowonoil Clearfield, UT
    April 21, 2011 8:45 a.m.

    "The only cure is for people to stop buying stuff they can not afford, even if it means continuing to rent, or living in a smaller, less expensive house, and driving and older, cheaper car."

    Are you trying to destroy our economy, DN Subscriber? Why do you hate America?

  • xscribe Colorado Springs, CO
    April 21, 2011 8:52 a.m.

    "By and large I don't think that's the average person being foreclosed upon," he said. "The person who's losing their home today is somebody who lost their job because of the financial crisis."

    Let's break that paragraph down: First, this person only "thinks" the average person being foreclosed upon are not those who borrowed too much money. I'm sure most of you can harken back to when you were buying a home, at least I can, and the banks offered us way more than we could pay, or at least that's where our whole paycheck would go to.

    This person next says that the people who are losing their homes today are those who lost their jobs. Okay, I can go with that. But to then blame the banks and mortgage companies doesn't fit, unless this person believes the banks and mortgage companies should provide the person who lost their home a job. How can it be the bank or mortgage company's fault.

    @my2cents: Why should the banks negotiate? You signed a contract. Why should you get a better deal just because....??

  • SoUtBoy25 Cedar City, UT
    April 21, 2011 9:07 a.m.

    Yes mortgage brokers, wall street money, and government programs pushed or allowed products that never should have been available to the public (i.e. interest only ARM's, Negative Amortization loans, no down payment programs), but people need to take responsibility for their financial lives. The increase in a homes value doesn't pay the loan off, you're income and savings do. Before you get a home, pay off consumer debt, build a rainy day fund, and save for a down payment. Then find a home that fits your budget (debt to income no greater than 33%. Also, find a community bank that services mortgages or someone that has a local person in your area. If you follow these simple guidelines you will never face foreclosure.

  • Victor Layton, UT
    April 21, 2011 9:14 a.m.

    Wow, there is certainly a lot of sympathy shared in prior post . The real question is what all the financial institutions did with the billions of tax payer dollars supposedly distributed for the benefit of the public. It is obvious after this recent crisis those funds never reach those that actually might be in need. So why hasn't the govt. stopped the spending that has only resulted in bigger pension plans for fortune 500 CEOs? Congress is just now realizing banks make more money by allowing foreclosures than by helping people to modify their loans? Yes, amazing concept that businesses are in it for themselves and look at the bottom line. I can't blame them, but this is why the Feds need to stay away from the marketplace!

  • jane Hereford, AZ
    April 21, 2011 9:16 a.m.

    I'm on all sides of this. Yes, some people were unwise in buying too much fancy houses, taking adjustable mortgages, etc.

    But people with big families genuinely need somewhat bigger houses, too. I know, I lived in an 800 sq. ft. home once with five kids, husband and a friend--it was doable for a short time, but awfully hard. We were thrilled to move into a house with 1120 sq ft and a basement we could finish.

    On the other hand, when one of my sons went to buy a small 3 bedroom fixer-upper at a reasonable price at the time for our area, he was encouraged by the mortgage company to fudge his income to qualify more easily--which he refused to do. They took over a VA loan on the re-possessed house--at a significantly higher interest rate than is going now. They've had several periods of unemployment due to the economy--he works construction. They lost their insurance and had a terrible accident to a kid. VA refuses to restructure the loan as some mortage holders are willing to do. VA outsources loan management to India, by the way. No help.

  • USAlover Salt Lake City, UT
    April 21, 2011 9:31 a.m.

    Victims, victims, victims. Perhaps the biggest cause of problems in this country is because everybody is owed something and a viction OF something. Good grief, people, grow up.

    America needs a paradigm shift in it's perception of exactly what is "owed" or what "victim" even means. I'm worried about the future of our country, NOT because of who is President but because who the people are becoming.

  • JZ42 Salt Lake City, Utah
    April 21, 2011 9:37 a.m.

    I vividly remember buying our first house and having the bank put down the dollar figure we were able to borrow. We were shocked and knew we could not afford it so we borrowed much less. Just because the bank puts down a number doesn't mean you have to borrow that amount. Most homeowners are not and were not victims rather didn't make decisions based on their financial situation. Banks don't know how much you spend at 7-11 each morning or how much you donate to charity. They simply approve you based on income not expenses but people forget that simple fact. It is easy to blame someone else rather than take personal responsibility. We learn how to do homework in school but people seem to forget how once they make the largest financial decision of their life. Now thanks to banks and individuals who made very poor decisions I have to figure out how to pay my bills. Thank you very much!

  • oldcougar Orem, UT
    April 21, 2011 10:02 a.m.

    I know some of you. You are the same people that think every homeless person is a criminal and deserves to be hungry, cold, and friendless. Certainly most every person losing a home to foreclosure could have done things differently...and may, indeed, have made some bad decisions. But they probably didn't choose to lose a job or a business. They probably didn't choose to have a catastrophic illness. They probably didn't choose their distress and sorrow. Even if they were at fault and foolish...why despise them, ridicule them, or shun them? I speak from experience. And I now know who our real friends are. And I thank God for them. We'll dig out of our mess and be better people for the experience...at least partly because of the unconditional love and encouragement of good, faithful, forgiving friends.

  • Newspaperreader Salt Lake City, UT
    April 21, 2011 10:14 a.m.

    While banks and mortgage companies are not totally blameless, most of the responsibility for the situations of homeowners rests with the homeowners. Many bought more house than they needed or could really afford. They were too immature to plan for a possible day of financial reckoning because they were busy playing with their new pick-up trucks, ATVs, recreational vehicles, watching their satellite TV, and using their iPhones, and other garbage they didn't need nor could they afford on top of their mortgage payments.

  • JZ42 Salt Lake City, Utah
    April 21, 2011 10:15 a.m.

    Oldcourgar - the article is about people being victimized by predatory lending practices not people losing homes due to illness, loss of job, etc. People who make poor financial decisions are not being ridiculed or shunned rather people are trying to point out that they made the decision to borrow above their means and should not simply blame. The government should not save people who make poor decisions. Some comments are rather mean but the majority are simply saying people used the lending system just as much as lenders. They saw an opportunity to get a bigger, nicer home using stated income etc. Both parties need to take responsibility on this matter.

  • Go Big Blue!!! Bountiful, UT
    April 21, 2011 10:18 a.m.

    Larger homes, newer cars, bigger flat screen TVs, fancier multimedia phones, regularly eating out, having 100s of dish/cable channels, owning latest laptops/Ipad gadget, extensive collection of blueray movies, expensive vacations . . .

    It is all of these necessities that are getting people into trouble.

    Perhaps the government could do a better job of providing us with all of these needs?

  • DeltaFoxtrot West Valley, UT
    April 21, 2011 10:30 a.m.

    Part of the problem is that houses have depreciated over the past 5 years. A house that cost $200,000 in 2006 might be worth $125,000 today. So if people do get in trouble or find themselves in a situation where they can no longer afford to live where they do, they can't sell the house and break even. So they end up stuck there, unable to pay the mortgage, until they are foreclosed on.

    It is the fault of homeowners who overspent and didn't plan correctly... but can we really blame people for taking what was offered to them? It is also the fault of the banks for accepting such low down payments and extending huge amounts of financing to people who really couldn't afford it. They gambled that prices would keep rising and even if people defaulted they would be able to flip the house for a profit. That gamble didn't work.

    The only difference is, the banks got millions to keep themselves from going under, while the homeowners got nothing. The govt. helped out big business first and the people last, which only made the recession last longer.

  • patriot Cedar Hills, UT
    April 21, 2011 11:10 a.m.

    Exactly right. Great point. Those who lose their homes are truly victims - cast away by out dated laws and regulations. There has to be a better way so that families can keep their homes as they move to rebuild their lives. It serves no one when thousands are thrown out of their homes.

  • Happy Valley Heretic Orem, UT
    April 21, 2011 11:17 a.m.

    The banks got their bail-out from the American People, but the American people can rot homeless without jobs cause they don't contribute to Your representative offshore account like the Banks do.

    DeltaFoxtrot said: The only difference is, the banks got millions to keep themselves from going under, while the homeowners got nothing. The govt. helped out big business first and the people last, which only made the recession last longer.

    For the republicans it's business as usual.

    Got to love the Crowd who believes this could never happen to them cause' they're too clever.

  • AlanSutton Salt Lake City, UT
    April 21, 2011 11:22 a.m.

    Utah is only high in foreclosures because, unlike other states, Utah's laws make it very easy to foreclose. In many states, the foreclosure process is long and time-consuming for lending institutions. In Utah, it relatively simple.

  • Houdini Dallas, TX
    April 21, 2011 11:29 a.m.

    Deltafoxtrot.......What does depreciation have to do them not being able to afford to continue paying for the house? When the $200,000 home depreciated to $125,000 it doesn't affect the monthly mortgage payment. They may not have equity now, but it doesn't affect their means to pay for the house.

    And to use the word gamble explains it all. Gamblers usually lose.

    I know tons of people whose homes have depreciated and they are still making payments just like they agreed to when they signed the papers on that 30 year loan. Matter of fact, that is most of America. History proves that real estate always comes back over time. That $200,000 home may be worth $300,000 in ten years but gamblers are not patient people.

  • USAlover Salt Lake City, UT
    April 21, 2011 11:37 a.m.

    @Deltafoxtrot,

    "can we really blame people who took what was offered them?"

    The answer to your question is YES! Good grief, people........

  • unaffiliated_person Saratoga Springs, UT
    April 21, 2011 11:48 a.m.

    DeltaFoxtrot,
    Yes, we can blame people for accepting what was offered. Personal responsibility comes into play. It is your responsibility to understand your cash flow, not the lender. If someone offers me a loan that is more than I can afford, I say no. In fact, I bought my house at the tip of the market and did not buy at the max-qualifying amount. I am now not even remotely close to underwater on it.
    Depreciation should only matter if you are forced to relocate (such as job requirements). Your mortgage isn't fluctuating with the home value. If job loss or job relocation requires it, that is where the now oft-abused short sale comes into play.

  • washcomom Beaverton, OR
    April 21, 2011 11:51 a.m.

    The lenders tend to lean mostly towards the upper end of the lending possibilities, thus setting out a carrot that is hard to achieve.

    When people look at purchasing homes, they need to understand that their house payment should only be 50% of their take-home pay. The other money - 20% savings, 30% household designated items - should be budgeted in. If the payment is more than 50% of your net income, then you are in way over your head.

  • USAlover Salt Lake City, UT
    April 21, 2011 12:05 p.m.

    @deltafoxtrot,

    A long with bad loans, I'd hope you'd refuse addicting drugs, alcohol, dangerous sexual activity and a loaded pistol when offered to you to play cowboys and indians with your children.

  • oldcougar Orem, UT
    April 21, 2011 12:33 p.m.

    JZ42, thanks for interpretting the article and the associated comments for me. If I may interpret my answer for you: I said, "I know some of you..." and was referring to those whose comments you referred to as "mean." I'm not ungrateful, however, and wish you well in your future efforts to tutor others who actually need the help. ;)

  • Orem Parent Orem, UT
    April 21, 2011 4:27 p.m.

    Your payment should be 50% of your take home pay?

    No way!

    Maybe 33% at most.

    This is exactly why we are in this mess.