The Jazz have 14 games in January half of those against some very good teams.
This month will be a good test. Will the Jazz win 50% or will they loose to the
good and only win half the bad teams?21 & 11 now 30 and 16 by
Matthews is in a system that uses the shooting guard in its offensive game plan.
Jerry does no such thing for his shooters. A lot of times, CJ is forced to
throw up a bad shot because the 24 second clock is about to go off. You don't
see the point guard in Portland holding the ball for 20 seconds on most
possessions. Big difference in your ability to score when you are the go-to guy
or an afterthought in Jerry's system. There is a reason that players don't want
to play in Utah.
CJ Miles is very funny with his comments...in 5 years CJ was with the Jazz...how
come he is still inconsistent? Hayward on the other hand..a rookie...pulled of a
three game solid performance...CJ on the other hand would put up a monster
game...a clunker with his 1/11 a mediocre game...then another clunker...then a
prett decent game...and a clunker...5 years of development and that's all he
could show for? give either rookie those 5 years...i promise you...they will be
far better player than CJ "The Next Byron Russel" Miles...
A consistent Wes Houdini is better than an up and down CJ, although have said
for weeks CJ should be starting over Bell. My feeling is it will be other
players turn to step up tomorrow because the odds are CJ and AK will be off
again.I saw Matthews vs Houston the other night. I have yet to see
him play a bad game, that is fact and reality. He also shoots about 46 percent
from the field. If we still had him, be in much better shape.
miles,Matthews was,is and is gonna be better than cj.period.He works
harder,understands the game better,thus has a lot higher basketball IQ.That
said,we are stuck with miles,as no other teams seem to have him on their wish
list.When he`s good,he`s good,when he`s bad,he`s terrible.And you need to learn
how to read,I said Matthews was good,not great,big difference
This team unfortunately learned early on this season that they can "flip
the switch" and beat most lame NBA teams.They have done it
against most of the teams this season. The unfortunate by-product of this is
they believe they can do it when they really can't.Who really
believes that will work against the Spurs, Mavs, Celts, or the Heat next time we
play them?It did not work against Portland either who appears to
have figured out that Aldridge is like kryptonite to Jefferson and Millsap who
were nothing more than casual observers as Aldridge backed them down and scored
over both of them at will.As soon as Fess got in the game then
suddenly Aldridge was passing out or shooting tough fade away jumpers.
Unfortunately though Fesenko can not throw it in the ocean from the freethrow
line so his pathetic shooting prevents sloan from being able to keep him in for
stops at the end of the game.
Houdini if Matthews was such a great player and Boozer is better than Jefferson,
why is the Jazz record better this year?Maybe because Matthews
wasn't really that good in Jerry's system. With CJ playing more minutes, the
Jazz are better. Matthews had a whole year to prove he was all it and he didn't
even show up in the playoffs.If you read the box scores every night,
you would realize that all the other Jazz players are up and down too with their
shot. Pay better attention on a nightly basis............
A close game makes it very entertaining, but I'm not certain it is a good omen
for the future.
It would be interesting at this point to mix up the starting line up a little.
Starting CJ might help, but it would mean that Price would get fewer minutes as
Bell would be playing with the second unit at the 2, and Hayward would be
getting CJ's minutes on the second unit. It may cause the second
unit to slow down a lot which could cause problems.
Re: Miles starting...CJ will do one of 2 things,be on fire,shoot 7/9 or
disappear and go 1/11.Can`t have that from anyone but CJ is consistently
inconsistent.That`s what made Matthews such a good player for us,and even when
he wasn`t shooting well,he did so many other things well especially
defense.Maybe if Miles would forget about those 3`s and drive,drive,drive,who
knows,but so far 6 years in we can`t depend on him everyday
I still think this team needs a big man to be starting,a bruiser type like Fess
to rebound and block shots to jump-start the stagnant offense. In many games the
Jazz have been unable to stop other teams from scoring inside. I would like to
see AK coming off the bench and playing with Price,Watson,CJ,and Elson/Memo.
This lineup could definitely provide energy with more of a run-and-gun lineup.
I've never been a fan of AK playing in Sloan's slow and deliberate style of
post'em up offense,and that's what the Jazz always try to establish that first
quarter. I agree with the Captain in that Fess needs to play with Milsap, Big
Al,and Williams so that his lack of scoring doesn't hurt the team on
offence,It's his defense,rebounding,overall presence in the middle the Jazz are
sorely lacking in many of these games.
Did anyone else besides me get the feeling that due to Hayward's improved play
as of late,it sent a message to both Miles and AK. For once ,both of these guys
simultaneously put together a reasonable game. In the Past ,it has always been
that one or both of these guys havn't shown up. So,my thoughts are even if
Hayward isn't in the game,he's still helping the Jazz by forcing CJ and AK to
play well. I've never seen Miles with such a determined ,go-getum type of game
face as he had on last night. It reminded me of D-Will's game face. That's what
this team needs, to get a little meaner and hungrier.Evan AK got that silly
smily smirk off of his face,and the attitude ajustment,like CJ's helped him have
a better game.
Just as I mentioned yesterday, CJ can score in bunches as he did last night.
There is a reason Gordon didn't play much last night, CJ is a better player.A win is a win. Doesn't matter if it is one point or 100 points it
still counts the same at the end of the year.As far as being behind
most games from lack of focus by the starters, that is Jerry's problem to fix.
He is the one who decides who causes the slow starts. He could change the
starting lineup but he chooses not to. I think Millsap and Jefferson are slow
starters to begin with and that doesn't help.
AK played decent, not great, and not worth the money he makes, but he played
okay. Bell looked to shoot the wide open jumper instead of pump faking like he
normally does, that helped win the game in the end. Milsap is not as hot as he
was a month ago, for some reason? My biggest question....why is CJ Miles not
starting at the 2..?? Bell should be running with the second group and CJ should
be helping us get off to better starts. I really think that is the answer. START
CJ MILES! Bring Bell off the bench, just try it for a couple of games, i bet we
start off much better. Keep working hard, go JAZZ!!
Dear Big Al,Please, please DUNK THE BASKETBALL. You have the size
and the hands to do it. At the very least you'll get foul shots.Thank you.
The Jeckle Hyde syndrome was not all Boozer. It still exists to some extent. This year it is more dependent on hot/cold outside shooting but the Jazz
do not get serious about winning or defense until the 4th Q. A lot of teams do
that but the Jazz tend to do it consistently.As Okur gets up to
speed that should even the team out some. He will not improve the defense but he
should help the spacing and offense on both the 2nd and so called first team.
He gives another 3 point shooter who may be hot. Sloan will have
more options to rotate for 3s. Okur can rebound and play inside especially
against certain match ups to negate some height problems. The
development of GH is also crucial. AK is always plagued with minor injuries.
Further, GH can take some minute load off of AK and Bell. If his shooting gets
consistent he is a viable option for both when they are cold or nicked. I expect the Jazz to improve. Their defense is mostly a matter of them
taking it seriously. Too many minutes may cause some to slack early in the game.
Detroit scored 28 points in the paint. This was finally a good defensive effort
by Utah keeping the opponents from scoring inside. Teams are now shooting 71%
jump shots. That is up 6% from last year - Excellent. Detroit
played a very interesting lineup at the end of the game. T-Mac - 6'8(PG),
Hamelton 6'7 (SG), Prince 6'9 (SF), Daye 6'11 3 point shooting (PF) Monroe 6'11
(C). That is a match-up nightmare Lineup. Williams guarding Hamelton, Bell
guarding T-Mac, Millsap guarding Daye. Really the only negative
thing was 2 plays at the end of the game. First Williams drove and dished the
ball Bell. Bells man followed Williams to the paint and was wide open for a
corner 3. He decided to drive the ball into the lane for a contested missed
layup. After Millsap made 4 consecutive free throws he had the ball
about about 1 foot behind the free throw line. Daye was standing about 5 feet
away. Instead of taking an in rhythm shot he passed the ball to Jefferson to
for a dunk but he was blocked. It better to take open jump shots
than contested layups
Okay, just for the record, "huck" is not a word outside of Utah.I grew up there and used it a lot when I was a child, but everywhere
else it is the name of a Mark Twain character, not a verb meaning
WE won but I`m not impressed,we struggled to beat a bad team,this won`t fly when
we play the top team.Not much GH after he had a couple of nice games.Oh well we
have Miles back.Millsap and Williams as usual saved us.Bell nice shot...
I'm not complaining much, since the Jazz closed out this game and have closed
out several other ugly games against mediocre teams they should slaughter. But
where is the killer instinct, especially early in these games? Where's the
"we know we're 10x better than you" attitude? Talent wise, this team
is an elite, championship-caliber group, but often they play like they don't
know that...like they're unsure of their capability. Best PG in the league,
hall of fame coach, great power forwards, a great shot blocker in Al, finally a
couple of good centers, and very solid supporting cast with multiple scoring
weapons. Not to mention the best fans in the league. Look at what we've got
here! Come on guys, you are MUCH better than a 5-point victory over Detroit.
Play like you know it!
All right, you used the cutesy saved by the bell reference. You're not allowed
to used it ever again.
It is amazing what can be accomplished when the JAZZ hit 90% of their free
throws!!!I hope they continue to realize how much easier it is to
win when they hit their free throws.
What a great game for D-Will and Al Jefferson. I was hoping to see more of
Gordon Hayward because of the possible rivalry between him and #7 pick Greg
Monroe. Greg Monroe has been averaging 5 points, 5 rebounds while Hayward has
had 3 points per game, 2 assists. But the last few games he's been in double
digits in scoring. I'll bet Jerry would have put him in more if it weren't such
a close game.
The Jazz allowed Detroit to play one of theyr'e better games offensively.
Whether AK or whoever guarded Prince no answer. Again, you can thank the bench
for a big part in the win. It was good to see some guys find the shot tonight.
AK was one of them starting. Price did off the bench. Watson has incredible
assists/turnover ratio, tonight was 5-0.Fesenko got his hand it
looked like on couple shot attempts, probably should have been credited with a
block.Jefferson at least came on to have a big 2nd half as did
Deron. Raja hit the crucial 3 to break 95 tie and added 22 free throws up 98-97
with like :14 left. It is scary the Jazz left the issue in doubt until the
final :04. If we play defense like this, Atlanta with theyr'e length will beat
us. I will take the win, but our defense has to improve.I found
funny at halftime Scott Layden discussed closing out on the 3 pointers by
Detroit with better recognition and rotation.They did not practice
what he preached, because Detroit had 4 "3s" in the 2nd half compared
to 3 First