Comments about ‘In our opinion: Say no to online poker’

Return to article »

Published: Friday, Dec. 10 2010 12:00 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
three11stu
Saratoga Springs, UT

While I agree that gambling is bad, how is it any different than legal drugs or pornography? Don't you think that individuals spending their money viewing porn or smoking could invest it, or spend it in other places? People should be able to decide whether or not they want to participate in gambling. There are many responsible gamblers in society, as well as some that are not so responsible. It is the same for the other things that I mentioned above.

JBrady
Murray, Ut

What is up with Reid? He must of received a bundle for his re-election campaign from the casinos.

AmericaTheFree
Tallahassee, FL

This legislation has clear opt-in language that will require the legislators in Utah to opt-in if they wish online gambling to be legal in your state. The major, reputable online poker vendors have already blacked out Washington based on legislation passed there. This bill will actually make it harder for your citizens to play poker online. I firmly believe that poker is a game of skill and that the right to choose to is part of what makes this great country America. I will not take issue with the fact that a great majority of the citizens of Utah will be against online gambling, but it is issues like these that make it much harder for the 'reds' and 'blues' in this country to get along.

I guess I would summarize by saying I don't think you should force your morality on the rest of the country especially when it will actually allow the citizens of your state to be better protected from said 'vices.' Best wishes from Florida.

Sally in England
Crawley, England

I don't understand your thinking here! I don't know what the legal age for gambling is in America, but in England it is 18 years old. Here we consider that to be the age of adulthood, when you can decide for yourself what you want to do with your money. Personally I think 21 should be the age, but that is my opinion. However, isn't Utah the state that opposes interferance from government? 'Give me my freedom or let me die'. 'we believe in each man for himself and we don't want the government to take our money thank you very muc hand give it to the poor'. Yet you back state law, enforaced by the governemt that a adult cannot choose how they want to spend their money? I find this very confusing. You are either for government interference or against it. I would choose not to gamble, but I would also choose that any other adult should be able gamble if that is what they want to do.

SLC gal
Salt Lake City, UT

People get addicted to liquor. Does that mean we should outlaw alcohol too?

So what if people with lower incomes tend to gamble more? They tend to play the lottery more too.

Personally, I think UT is missing out on a great deal of revenue with their archaic stance on gambling.

And so what if it opens the door for other forms? People will buy Powerball tickets here instead of ID or NV. People will stay here instead of traipsing off to Wendover.

I fail to see what the issue is.

dave
Park City, UT

"It is backed by sound logic and a desire to avoid the societal costs and economic squandering brought on by games of chance."

Sound logic? 96% of states allow gambling and opposed to the 4% that do not. Are we somehow more enlightened than the other 96%? No we are not. We just have a majority in this state that believe freedom means quashing the freedom of those that believe differently. The arrogance is staggering.

LDS Liberal
Farmington, UT

Here we go AGAIN!!!

Although I'm personally against gambling [including speculative investing in Real Estate, per the LDS leadership - as we've now seen is just as stupid]

Why is it Utahns,
who SAY they are for Freedom,
who SAY they are for Free Agency,
who SAY they undersatnd who's plan it was to ban all sins and vices - for good reasons....

You are either FOR freedom,
or against it.

I choose freedom, with all the consequences that come along with it!!!

devinm33
Provo, Ut

"For the federal government to officially open the door to Internet poker would make it that much harder for the state to honor the will of its people and discourage such activity."

Thank you for honoring my will and discouraging activities that you dont believe in. What would I do without you.
Could you honor my freedom next time?

MapleDon
Springville, UT

There are three issues the LDS Church's media (Deseret Media--yes, Virginia. The Church owns all of Deseret Media.) stands firm and allows no contrary statement by its staff: polygamy (against), gambling (against), and amnesty for illegals (for).

While gambling should have some restrictions, Deseret Media's (the Church's) lone focus on gambling because of its potential for becoming addicting is interesting. Okay, odd.

There are a lot of potentially addicting "things" out there. Some are quite common. Coffee and other caffeinated beverages, alcohol, tobacco. Behaviors can be addicting as well, such as shopping/spending, working, loafing, internet usage, and sexual practices.

Though some of these other potentially addictive products and behaviors might be discussed here and there, it's interesting the major focus in Deseret Media is on gambling.

Personally, I feel I should have the right to responsibly gamble, or to responsibly use the products or participate in the other behaviors listed above. Being responsible means I recognize I have to deal with the consequences. That's why I choose to avoid most of them.

However, singling out gambling as addictive is narrow minded.

Roscoe
West Jordan, UT

Why should the state decide for me if I (an adult) can play online poker or not? Those who want to play should be able to. Those who don't want to play don't have to. Let us decide what is best for us.

42istheanswer
SLC, UT

The only thing more boring than poker is online poker. It is like watching paint dry.

joe5
South Jordan, UT

Roscoe: The reason the "state" makes decisions is because we all have a voice in what our state becomes. Many (but a minority) in Utah would like out state to become "Pottersville" while most of us would like to live in "Bedford Falls." (ref: It's a Wonderful Life)

Nothing we do is done in a vacuum. We are all interconnected no matter how much we like to think we are islands. In every state, there have been compromises and the spectrum is somewhere between Pottersville and Bedford Falls.

Have you ever been to Camden, NJ? The city never passed legislation that permits murder or gang warfare. But they did allow an environment to be created where those activities could thrive. I feel sorry for those Camden-ites who would like to have the freedom to walk the streets at night instead of having to cocoon in their homes in order to stay alive.

Giving you a freedom, believe it or not, may take away one of my freedoms. That is why it is should always be discussed in the public forum. And you will not silence my voice or my freedom of speech.

devinm33
Provo, Ut

joe5..Please explain how giving utahns the choice to play online poker if they choose for themselves to do so, infringing on one of your freedoms.

devinm33
Provo, Ut

Also, saying that this bill is a disservice to open debate cause its being sneaked onto the tax-reform bill, and then mentioning the UIGEA bill that President Bush passed is quite hypocritical. Considering that the UIGEA became law in the EXACT same way that this bill is trying to. It was attached to some Free Port Trading act that noone would think to shoot down

joe5
South Jordan, UT

@devinm33: I'm not sure I understand your confusion. You didn't graps the Pottersville vs Bedford Falls concept? You didn't understand what I was saying about Camden, NJ? You don't understand the connectivity between people in a society?

Just last week, a store owner was stabbed to death in her own store right here in the Salt Lake valley. Why? Was it because the perp had been using drugs? Was it because he was a gang member fighting for his turf? Was it because he was broke due to gambling debts? We don't know but it could have been any of those reasons; including the gambling issue.

If that kind of violence repeats itself enough times, what kind of effect will that have on you and me? Might we restrict where we travel in the valley? Could it limit what times of day we are out at all? Or dozens of other decisions we might make because we feel unsafe? You don't think those are restrictions on our freedom?

devinm33
Provo, Ut

Lumping online poker in with gambling is the real problem here. It is completely different.

By your reasoning we shouldnt allow our children to ride a bike then. Who knows they may lose control go into the street have a car swerve to miss the child, lose control and roll over into another car and kill everyone.

And, no I dont think those are restrictions on our freedoms..You would still have the choice to go into that area of town without fear of breaking the law and going to prison for it.

I can understand your fear of being held up by a knife though. Seems logical.

VIDAR
Murray, UT

People who participate in online gambling are just dumb, dumb, dumb.
There is no regulation. Most of the sites are operated out of foreign countries.
When you go to Vegas the odds are against you. But at least there they make sure the casinos do not cheat.
Would you play poker if you had to play with all of your cards showing?
Well thats what they do with online gambling.
Just block all other gambling sites and only allow ones operated by the government.
In the disclosure you could say, you will not win, we will just collect all your money for taxes, have fun, no one reads the disclosures anyway.
If people want to just throw their money away, we should just let them, and put it toward public funds.

LDS Liberal
Farmington, UT

Free Agency -

Choose to
or
Not To.

If you take away choice,
You've taken away Freedom & Agency.

Tell me again Conservatives....
What is it you are trying to Conserve?

It most certainly isn't freedom.

Brother Chuck Schroeder
A Tropical Paradise USA, FL

I hope he turns all of Utah into a Las Vegas casino. Don't worry, with your new tax cuts the IRS won't deduct much from this. Sen. Harry Reid, the majority leader from Nevada, is pushing ahead with his efforts to legalize Internet poker before Congress adjourns this year, despite new criticism from state lottery officials, including a former Democratic National Committee chairman, that Reid's plan was an outrageous reward for big Las Vegas casino interests that heavily backed his campaign for re-election. Hope the GOP repeal that new 1099 Bill comeing in 2012.

JHP
Salt Lake City, UT

Good editorial.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments