Comments about ‘Readers' forum: Fill judicial vacancies’

Return to article »

Published: Wednesday, Nov. 24 2010 12:00 a.m. MST

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
Sabrecat
South Jordan, UT

It's a matter of "Whats good for the goose is good for the gander".

Democrats blocked numerous Bush bench nominations using the exact same method.

Is it right ?

No it isn't, but where was all the outrage when it was republican nominations? Left wing blogs and commentators are now calling for the enactment of the so called "Nuclear" option that would change senate rules regarding filibusters requiring a 60 vote majority to a simple majority. Yet these same commentators decried the very same thing when republicans threatened it when all the Bush nominations were held up. They said it was an abuse of power and a breach of the checks and balances that are built into government. Apparently its not an abuse of power when its the democrat nominations that are affected....

What they have sown they are now reaping.

Hellooo
Salt Lake City, UT

Given the absolute power we have allowed judges to acquire, the more that can be blocked from assuming office the better for us all.

AlanSutton
Salt Lake City, UT

This is what happens when judges decide issues that should be left to the legislative branch of government. We begin to mistrust them.

Furry1993
Somewhere in Utah, UT

Oh, the horror! How DARE those pesky judges refuse to allow people's Constitutional rights to be trampled, just because the majority want it it that way. Shame on THEM!!!!!

When the majority acts/legislaties in a way that impairs the Constitutional rights of people, judges have not on the responsibnility but the duty to stop that impairment. The judges are doing their jobs.

Kass
SLC, UT

@ AlanSutton: Please provide one instance where a judge has acted in a legislative manner.

KM
Cedar Hills, UT

Kass

Why do you think that President 'community organizer' Obama has placed two very radical activist judges in the supreme court? Was it to just interpret the law or something else? Just asking.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments