Comments about ‘EPA proposal on dioxin has Utah regulators on alert’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Growing pains: Rate of young men struggling...
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- BYU student killed after falling 70 feet in...
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Charges: Runaway teen caused accident that...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
34 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
15 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Poll shows Utahns think Legislature's...
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13 - Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
12






This article talks a lot about potential costs related to possible new rules, but doesn't even mention the health concerns related to Dioxin. Also, the American Chemistry Council is referenced and we are provided with a quote from one of its members, but no context. How about explaining that this is a group representing major chemical companies with a vested interest in opposing stricter government regulations?
Why are the state and city officials so up in arms and so quick to mention costs. Its always the cost they are concerned about, never the public health. They sound like Chairman Mao's "Capitalist Running Dogs!"
Thank God for the EPA, they're looking out for public health, unlike city and state bureaucrats.
Tell the EPA to get lost, we don't need them, don't want them, can't afford them. Do the country a big favor and just eliminate the worthless, totalitarian outfit.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments