What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Business
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Stalled job growth rattles U.S. economy
- Around world, Bloomberg soda war hard to swallow
- Crazy classifieds: Decorative weapons,...
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large sodas...
- KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
Most Commented
Across Site
In Business
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Couple can't retire because of $116,000...
19 - Stalled job growth rattles U.S. economy
10 - U.S. economy added 69,000 jobs in May,...
8 - Oil prices drop; will gas follow?
8 - Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake...
8 - Health care costs rose more than inflation
5 - Around world, Bloomberg soda war hard...
4






I have read through this article twice and it seems to say the opposite of the title given it.
The audit showed up questions of conflict of interest and could not show that the expense is paying off. The responses from the UDA and LSI are not convincing either.
These days legislators are saying that they want to cut waste and require evidence that our investments of public funds are boosting the economy. But as tax payers, we are concerned that the tax breaks for, or in this case outright funding to, corporate entities are just boosting the campaign funds of the politicians who allow them.
The difference between what the headline says and what the article says is a big deal.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments