Comments about ‘USDA stops using beetles vs. invasive saltcedar’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large sodas...
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Family at first sight: Girl with Down...
- Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
31 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
21 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14






Control of the invasive saltcedar would represent a positive change, in important regards even for the southwestern willow flycatcher, if that control can be achieved gradually over a span of years. If saltcedar is eliminated over time, willows and cottonwoods will repopulate many areas, and once more serve important ecological functions as they did before domination by the saltcedar, a troublesome Eurasian immigrant.
Cottonwoods and willows are the principal native woody species flycatchers would have used for nesting along the Colorado River prior to introduction and expansion of saltcedar. Who among us would not prefer southwestern willow flycatchers nesting in native willows and cottonwoods? Why defend a Eurasian immigrant with no legitimate ecological role here? It is conceivable that even southwestern willow flycatchers would prefer willows and cottonwoods for nesting (the birds evolved with willows and cottonwoods, after all, not saltcedar).
As long as saltcedar leaf beetles keep eating their sole plant host (saltcedar) the beetles are going to be good for the Colorado Plateau and for southwestern willow flycatchers nesting along the Colorado River, in general. If the Center for Biological Diversity has data which dispute the above-mentioned points, those data weren't mentioned in the article.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments