androol | 6:11 p.m. June 17, 2010 China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, North Korea,
Pakistan, Sudan, USA. How proud we must feel... ============== Agreed,This a is a sad, sad thing!!!
The death penalty is a deterant to capital crimes, but is shrinking with the
lengthy appeals process.1. There should be a maximum amount of time
allowed before a capital case goes to trial.2. There should be 2
appeals maximum and a maximum amount of time allowed to get through those.3. Overall, there should be a maximum amount of time beofre the
execution takes place, once the appeals are made and done.4. Every
state should have specific judges who only hear these cases.Only by
doing this will the constitution be followed.
Lightning is a terrible analogy and comparing the US to Mexico is laughable. I
keep trying to come up with a comparable comparison but every time I do it
"violates one of our rules."
Lightning is a terrible analogy and comparing the US to Mexico is just
ridiculous. I'll compare apples to cow dung and come up with some misleading
statistics too. Maybe even a chart.
Wisconsin does not have a death penalty and Jeffrey Dahmer a serial killer
murdered many people there. He died in prison because the guy in there had
nothing to lose by killing him. The wicked punish the wicked. It should bUsed
more. If it is less innocent people would be killed. And struck by lightning
is a bad analogy since getting struck by lightning can happen by being at the
wrong place at the wrong time. You have to be found guilty of murder to get the
@the truth - Still, those other "civilized" places have lower rates of violent
crime (and recidivism). Your death penalty doesn’t seem to be working as
a deterrent. It costs more to execute someone than it does to keep someone
incarcerated as well. Perhaps you’d be the kind of person who says
society should just do away with all that ‘due process’ or
‘fair trial’ mumbo-jumbo and just go straight to the sentencing. I
mean, that kind of justice system worked so well for the Taliban I see no reason
you’d want the USA to be any different. I wonder if you were
one of the people who defended Saddam Hussein’s justice system. He
didn’t have an appeals process either. As others have noted,
the USA is in good company considering who else still permits the death penalty.
RE: androol | 6:11 p.m.Yeah we are proud,that
taking a life of the innocent means something here,that he victim
life has value, that justice si meted out as equal to the horrible
crime as humanly possibly,while other so-called "civilized"
places taking a life is just another crime and therefore lacks in weight of
its severity.if it is all about money there are many ways in
which we can save maney in trying and punishing criminals,from more
thorough original trials, to corporal punsishment, to hastening exuction.but making the general public "pay" crime for the life sentence
should not be one of them.
China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Sudan, USA. How proud we must
Personally like the death penalty, if you are such a menace to society that you
have to be seperated from them forever you should be off the planet particularly
with 6 billion plus on this earth.
Yes, Ben, a long death penalty (on the taxpayers' dime). Some of these people
need a chance to reform and change their lives as much as is possible, but two
murders at two different times and another attempted murder in jail--this guy is
a poster child for the penalty.
What a specious argument! Since some who deserve the death penalty don't get
it, no one who deserves the death penalty should?What's next? Since
not everyone who speeds gets a speeding ticket, no one should? Since not
everyone who digs up pots on federal lands or reservations goes to jail, no one
should?Where does it end? Since not everyone who murders is
convicted, no one should be convicted of murder?C'mon!Not only that, the true-believing anti-death-penalty die-hards making this
specious argument are the very same activists that make executing the truly
deserving such an expensive, drawn-out, hit-or-miss proposition in the first
place.There is not the slightest doubt that Ronnie Lee Gardner
richly deserves the death penalty. And has for 25 years. That someone else who
also richly deserves to die for his crimes doesn't, is no reason to reward
First of all: Thanks Josh, I am going to be thinking this one over for awhile.
This makes me truly consider if the death penalty is needed, at the same time
though, isn't a life sentence a really long death penalty?
We should be using it a lot more
China, India, Iran and Iraq. These are the countries whose human rights we
mimic when we have the death penalty.
Gardner should have been executed years ago. He showed no respect for human
lives when he was young and that has not changed. (He stabbed another inmate and
could have killed him, too.) Some people will never change and are to dangerous
to leave even in prison. In certain situations the death penalty is
warranted.Without the death penalty some criminals will literally have
nothing to lose because going to prison is like going home for them. Some
criminals do not mind prison, that should be evident to the rest of us
considering how many re-offenders there are.