Comments about ‘Utah Jazz: Carlos Boozer or Paul Millsap?’

Return to article »

Published: Saturday, May 15 2010 12:21 a.m. MDT

Comments
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Most recommended
doc33

Actually, I don't think Millsap can physically stand up to the 82 game grind of the PF position. Thinking back 2 years ago when Boozer was hurt a lot, Millsap was dinged up pretty good himself during that stretch of games where he had that consecutive double-double streak.

In my estimation, Millsap is best served coming off the bench with Matthews and Ronnie Price. Hopefully, the Jazz can add the PF they need in this years draft.

Duds

In comparison to Boozer though, Milsap has held up better. You counter your argument in the same sentence, "...Boozer was hurt a lot, Milsap was dinged up pretty good himself". At least Milsap wasn't "out", while our precious Boozer was wearing suits. Milsap will be able to easily fulfill our PF role just fine. With both Boozer and Milsap, it's giving them room to operate.....and we can get this from the 5 spot.

Bugoff

The Booz/Okur experiment is a 2 part equation.

Okur averaged 13.5 points and 7+ rebounds last year. One of the justifications for Okur at C was his ability to shoot the 3 and pull the opponent C out, opening things up for Booz.

That may be misleading. Okur only averaged a little over 1 made 3 a game with 38% shooting.

If you replaced Okur with an inside out C who had a midrange shot and who was more traditional (a banger), the rebounds should go up to about 10 per games.

Each rebound is worth 1 point so the 3 points coming from Okur at the 3 line would not be lost.

However, if you had players at the SG/SF who could shoot the extra 3s (better %) you would raise the UT rebounding by 3 and get a better outside game.

Okur can't rebound from the 3 line.

If you got a C who rebounded and played D better, you fixed 2 major weaknesses. If you shift the 3s to the SG/SF you can play inside out.

UT is weaker in rebounding and 3s than most playoff teams. Fix it.

Bugoff

On Booz/Millsap I will make detailed comments later when I have time.

Booz had great numbers this year mostly because he is a great PF. However, he stayed healthy (except for the last PHO game). Okur's and Millsap's numbers dropped this year while Boozer's improved.

There are team dynamics for this. Okur deferred rebounds to Booz. Or Booz called for them. Millsap got fewer minutes and in a back up role.

DWill ran more of the offense thru Booz.

Boozer's numbers this year will be the best of his career.

Against LA Boozer was back to his fading jump shot and to getting blocked.

Millsap was able to go right at the trees inside much better. He is quicker and more explosive in his inside moves and can attack the LA bigs directly.

Booz does not have that ability. Millsap still gets blocked. He still gets shot over. He is not the PF of the future. But he is cheaper than Booz.

Millsap will put up just as good of numbers as Booz. His win score will be just as good.

AK can back him up. AK needs cloned.

Adjust the SF/SG/C.

J in NY

RE doc33:
I see no reason why Milsap wouldn't be able to manage playing 82 games a year, when considering he rarely misses games, and we're only talking about playing 10 extra minutes/game. The Jazz are not going to get a PF in the draft who would start over Milsap this year.

As for Mathews off of the bench, who is going to replace him in the starting line-up?

Uncle Rico

Boozer. Love Paul, but Boozer if I had to choose.

RSL LOVER

I think Milsap can put up the same numbers as Boozer and play better defense, our team is quicker when Milsap is in, but as Sloan said, who will replace Milsap? for sure will be our 1st round pick for this draft.

Captain L

So far in their careers Booz has proven to be better if you measure being better by scoring and rebounds but Milsap did show in the playoffs that he can be as productive as Booz. Paul did step up and play better than he had, he has more agility than Booz and that helped him score against the trees of LA better than Booz could. Milsap is a better defensive player and he is more durable.
Financially signing Booz would seriously hurt the Jazz for any flexability regarding player moves.
The fact that Booz & Milsap are very similar in size, & productivity and that with them we can't compete against the tall,long athletic bigs of LA & other elite teams means Booz has to go and we need to make decisions for the future accordingly. Finding a good 4 or 5 in the draft usually means you need to have a top 5 or top 10 pick and considering that the Jazz usually draft in the 20's, we probably need to use this pick on a long, athletic, shotblocking 4.

Donald

Boozer leaving is the only way the Jazz can get better. AK and Paul will take care of the PF position. Jazz need another center to compliment Okur.

Captain L

As more information comes out regarding the players available around #9 my opinion very easily could change but right now I like Ekpe Udoh. He is 6'10, long, athletic, shot blocker, defender and handles the ball very well for a 4. He blocked 3.7 shots per game last year, has a 7'4 1/2 wing span.
Greg Monroe 6'10/11 of Georgetown, lefty, teams offense ran thru him, rebounds well,7'2 wing span, versatile, block 1.6 per game, good passer, unselfish.
Either one of these guys look like they would be a good pick up. I like how Udoh blocks shots so well,it would be interesting to have them both come to the same workout and see how they compete against each other and in structured workouts designed to evaluate their talent.

Bugoff

I am going to make both the pro and con arguments for Boozer. I personally feel the team is better off in the long run moving beyond Booz. In the short run it is a difficult year or two.

1. In 32 seasons only 6 teams have won a championship having only one player with a WP48 higher than .200. Most championship teams have 1 player above .300 plus 2 above .200. WP48 is essentially win score adjusted for 48 minutes of playing.

2. This year (2010) Booz was .291, DWill .239 and AK .221. Millsap was .143. Last year Millsap was .229 and Booz was .158. Starting at PF jumps your WP48.

3. If Booz leaves his WP48 has to be replaced by Millsap and AK or a PF back up. Then AK's WP48 at SF has to be replaced.

4. Booz was .251 in 2008, .345 in 2007 and .248 in 2006. We have probably already seen Booz's best year.

5. Millsap's best year was 2009. He has added a jump shot and should continue to improve.

6. AK's WP48 will improve some as he plays at PF.

Millsap/AK can replace Booz.

Captain L

Everyone keeps saying we need a new center to help Okur.
It doesn't seem to matter how many times we point out that Fes had the best plus / minus of any player on the team. That means while he was on the floor his team (Jazz) scored more than their opponent. That is what we want isn't it! Fes will only get better with playing time. Be patient and let's hope the coaches work hard with him and KK.
With Fes and KK the Jazz have two 7 footers that have potential and just need to be developed.
Two areas of need defensive/shotblocking PF to replace Booz and an athletic 3 (that can shoot) to back up AK and eventually replace him.
CJ filled in at the 3 Ok last year but he is more suited to play the 2.

Bugoff

None of Booz/Millsap/AK are the right PF to beat LA.

To get the right PF UT will have to draft the right one. It will take 2-5 years to develop a draftee.

The current version of the Sloan flex is overly reliant (held hostage to) the PF position. It is extremely weak at the SG position. They are too one dimensional.

There is equifinality. There are several approaches that will produce a championship team with roughly equal costs. All approaches will have some weaknesses and some different strengths.

In plain English there is more than one way to skin a cat or achieve a goal.

The Jazz are fully capable of winning a championship with Millsap at PF but only if they put more WP48 into other positions.

I maintain that UT will not win a championship with Booz unless they do put more WP48 into other positions.

With Okur out it is very tempting to give Booz a lot of money to "save" next year.

We need to continue to rebuild now.

Booz will never be better and his contract will kill the Jazz in 2013-2016 and sooner when he gets hurt.

Captain L

Re Bugoff: I appreciate your reseach and stats, they are very interesting. Keep up the good work.

Bugoff

It is not just losing Booz that has to be addressed. The C is a MAJOR issue.

In the playoffs Fes's points and rebounds when adjusted for minutes played (18 vs 29) were just as good as Haywood who started for DAL. However that is still not as good as Okur's regular season numbers.

Assuming that Fes/Koufos play C next year due to money issues. Additional WP48 has to be put into the SG/SF positions. Fes/Koufos will improve (rapidly) with playing time, but the Jazz need at least 10 points and 10 rebounds from the C position in 30 minutes to compensate for losing Okur.

If AK plays at PF 1/2 of the time, his WP48 has to be replaced at SF. CJ played really well this last month. Will he do it all of next year? If he does then he can provide more WP48 at SG by backing up Mathews and playing some at SF.

The Jazz need a NBA ready 6'10", defending, shooting, rebounding SF. A SF/PF tweener would be ideal and much cheaper than the ultimate PF.

The team needs more WP48 and more balance across positions.

Bugoff

The New CBA may change all of the rules for winning a championship. It is not wise to give Booz or any player a big multi year contract prior to the CBA.

AK will be expiring next year. He also is getting older. He will have to be replaced or resigned at a lower figure.

It is far better for the team in the long run to take the 15-17 mill it would take to sign Booz and start getting the right players at PF and SF for reasonable before the New CBA.

Some of that money could go into a SG but if CJ plays to potential he and Mathews are good enough there for the next couple of years.

To win a championship the Jazz need 3 players with WP48s near .300 and they need the collective team to have a high enough WP48. This later issue killed the Stockton/Malone teams.

Several Western Conf teams have multiple high WP48 players with good supporting casts. 3 of the Eastern teams do.

The Jazz have to build a team that can beat LA. They can not do that relying on DWill plus Booz or Millsap at PF.

Bugoff

It is worth noting that Fes now has an agent with a long bad history with the Jazz.

Do not count on Fes being with the Jazz in the fall. They had their chances to lock him up before now and played games with him.

The Jazz organization is really not very bright sometimes.

Koufos better work on his A game. He could be the starting C this fall.

There are several good reasons to do really well in drafting in the 1st round. The Jazz are really lousy.

I would say that their very poor drafting record in the first round is a major reason why they rarely get higher than a 4th seed or go deep in the playoffs.

Bugoff

The more I think about this the more I realize the Jazz have trapped themselves once again.

Fes' agent will demand blood, the Jazz will low ball and Fegan will send Fes else where. The Jazz will be under extreme pressure to resign Booz so they can play small ball. Booz will demand bank and shaft the Jazz in the longer run or until the next injury.

They do not have the money nor the trade assets to go get a good C. They might get someone like Haywood for the MLE but DAL can give him more.

If they can't resign Fes they may lean toward drafting Cole Aldrich. He does not solve the C or the PF problems.

They may be able to sign and trade Booz for some help. They may be able to move AK's expiring contract.

There is a reason why Sloan talked about tanking for 6 years as a way to get enough talent to win a championship.

The Jazz may need a C and a PF. Where do they get a great one for reasonable?

Bugoff

How viable is it to bring Tomic over? This does not look good. I do not see a C in the top 10 who would really help the Jazz immediately.

Cousins even if they got a chance to get him seems like a NON SLOAN player.

The Jazz should have extended Fes before his agent went to work for SAC and Fes hired a major headache as a replacement.

Bugoff

Why did not the Jazz put a team option into Fes's contract last fall? If they are going to develop these 2nd rounders then they need to tie them up instead of wait to get mugged by the agents and teams like POR in FA.

I am sure that negotiating with many of these agents is difficult but the Jazz can do better than they have been doing.

to comment

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
About comments