Comments about ‘Lohra Miller seeks re-election as Salt Lake County District Attorney’

No thanks.

Who in the world wants more of Lohra Miller? Please, please, Lohra, just go away.

She is the epitome of crooked cronyism in local politics.

Do not attack Miller when you have no idea what you are talking about! Miller has forged positive relationships with law enforcement, victim's rights organizations, and the criminal justice system as a whole. The office is run effectively and efficiently, and the tremendous caseload is handled in a very professional manner.

And you don't want more of Lohra Miller because...........
A. You don't like effective programs.
B. You don't like efficient government.
C. You are jealous of innovative genius.
D. You are so stupid that the National Enquirer is your preferred news source.

Mark Shurtleff is my election compass- if he shows up at your announcement that you're running, you're either too crooked or too stupid to get my vote.

That went for Mark Walker and goes for Mike Lee and Lohra Miller.

The Shurtleff endorsement is like rolling around in a pile of manure.

i really think that this is one of the better articles written about District Attorney Miller. She has done a great job in her 4 years as our DA, and when looking into the programs she has created, and the fiscal responsibility she's adhered to, she definitely gets my vote.

Miller had her chance and couldn't cut it. Time for a change.

Thanks, but no thanks.

Remember that Miller has hired extra PR people during the county budget crisis. I am sure this is the beginning of planted stories prepared by these people.

Good job organizing campaign workers to make comments on stories. However, they're a little transparent. For example, you should let "Adam" know that you haven't been the DA for 4 years (barely over 3). It damages credibility. Interesting strategy to inspire negative news stories every few weeks, and then ask for a "positive" campaign...

Very telling - Miller wants to talk about issues, and keep this campaign "positive".

Sure, she can talk about the positive things she has accomplished (there are several). But if she leaves out the negative aspects (cronyism, self-indulgence, self-gain, distorted logic, and abuse of taxpayer dollars) she will be leaving out 60% of what's she's done for the past 4 years in this elected position.

Bottom line: Miller has shown us that immaturity and self-interest are the hallmarks of her service. We can do better - much better - with any of the other candidates in the race. We have excellent choices, and Miller isn't one of them.

I love how Republicans are so forgiving of cronyism in time of economic cuts.

What about the fight the two men had to put with to get charges of assualt charges when they were charge with kidnapping. Sound to me it's time to get a D.A. who will do the job right and when a job is left to deceide who to charge and, sound like selected proscution Miller should just go or be brought up on charges of not doing her job by the letter of the law.

Where did you learn to speak/write the English language???

Miller, get out. You should be prosecuted by your very office. Your web page is a joke, and all lies as usual. I sent an e-mail to the press so they uncover your lies. Round table with law enforcement,,,,ahahhahahah remember, ask a cop, well ask one know.. Your wave is crashing.. finally.

You want this election to be about issues, you have to many, we don't have that kind of time. Just vote NO for Miller and lets move on cleaning house. My tax dollars are tired of for your vacation. I have never seen anything like this person, does she live on the same planet?

She might not be from this planet... She wears purple glitter french tip nails, on which planet are those 'professional'? And pants that are waaaaay too short in the stride. She's from whichever planet considers her manner of dress "professional."

Does it really count if there is a conviction if the original charges were grossly over charged? If you charge someone with a half dozen things, and get a plea on one of them and not even the most serious - how does that 'count'? More importantly, how much does it COST the taxpayers?

I don't want any politician giving me numbers and percentages unless they show how they made the calculation.