What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Cottonwood High School football coach Josh...
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large sodas...
- Family at first sight: Girl with Down...
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Investigators focus on stains in car of dead...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
29 - Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
27 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
24 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
20 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13






All the water districts have to do is deny any new connections to their system, especially if it is stressed beyond ability to provide. Can't do that? Why not?
Conservation has to begin with available resources, the users already do their best to conserve. These water laws are not effective or legal legislation for water companies who are forced to override conservation efforts with new over development. The water companies do have that authority but are afraid to use it.
Way to go Cities! What are you really hiding? Poorly performing employees or is it worse than that?
Another example of how "socialization" doesn't work. Give the water rights to private companies and they'll make it better. Do you really want frivilous water companies, post offices, and school districts running our health care? I sure don't!
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments