Reader comments
Scream 2

6 comments   |   Read story

Grant Dyer | 1:27 p.m. Oct. 26, 1998
Hey,
Brilliant. Better than the first one...I hope the 3rd is
just as good. Neve Campbell kicks butt in this one. I think
Jada could have been in it more, but that's the only bad
thing in it.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Josh | 11:16 a.m. Nov. 28, 1998
Scream 2 was just a witty, if not wittier , than the original, The Scream movies have great dialogue and very clever death scenes that seem to scare everybody witless. I don't see why you MR,VICE can't be kind to a movie so great as this, just because it is a horror. You seem to think you are god with these movies, But i'm here to say that these movie was great and no matter what Mr. VICE says, i hope everyone goes and see's it.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Gothic | 6:09 p.m. June 27, 1999
Well, I saw it because sequels draw me like magnets. But, oh
no, I do believe I was once again disappointed for the most
part. Truthfully, I was upset that they took out Randy like
that. Poor, poor Randy, who should have lived simply because
he was so pathetic, and probably didn't because he got away
scott free in the first film. I especially grew to dislike
Sidney, who didn't seem to care that Randy was killed
because she happened to have a disfunctional family, which
is what it all boiled down to. Her mother slept with
someone's dad- guy's wife is upset- wife's son tries to kill
other woman's daughter. Then the cycle starts again, with
the mother being the killer this time. At any rate, it was a
lot scarier this time around and at least the end was a
nice, fat surprise!
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
E-Dawg | 11:26 a.m. Feb. 5, 2000
This was good, but the ending was very dissapointing.
There is something about having a woman as one of the
killers that doesn't work. Even though it was Billy's Mom,
it still didn't seem to work. It should have been Billy's
brother or another friend or something. Anyway, it was
still a good movie, but barely if at all surpasses the
first one.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Avi Green | 9:52 a.m. Aug. 1, 2000
It really disappoints me that Vice should have to make his
rating higher for the second film. Just because the chances
that it'll fail at box office are slim does not mean that
he has to boost his rating. Oh, don't worry, I know about
the way negative effects can work, but that still doesn't
mean that he should have to raise his rating to a higher
one. One sure thing, this abomination only lowers the bar
even further. And if parents don't start getting strict
with their kids, then how do we ever expect movies like
this smut to fail? Start wising up parents, and get tough
when it come to gory and graphic violence. Believe me, it's
even more dangerous than sex scenes. Scream 2 is also to be
condemned, and I think it would be a good idea if the youth
market were to try and condemn it first. I strongly advise
teens everywhere to take the challenge of condemning this
atrocity. Believe me, you are quite capable of slamming
this and the film industry that dares to bankroll it.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Mark | 6:29 p.m. Aug. 13, 2000
Scream 2 was better than the first. I don't see how some
people don't like it. It was scarier, wittier, funnier,
and more suprising than part one. It was clever and had a
great plot. Every scene was done perfectly. It had a lot
of good one liners in it. However doesn't like it is just
not smart enough to realize it's brilliance.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
In Movies Across Site