Reader comments
Anaconda

I thought Anaconda was one of the dumbest"supposedly"
horror movies to ever be made.The snake was fake looking
and the only good part was when the evil guy died.

Why would anyone ever make a movie this pathetic?The only
good part was when the snake ate the guy and it showed him
inside the snakes stomach.

Wow!... This movie is soooo bad!... You have to see it to
believe that anything so awful could make it to the screen!
I recommend it as a perfect example of how NOT to make a
movie! Jon Voight is laughably awful as the villian. Tsk
tsk.

This movie was sooooooo bad! It was unnessasarily
gross,(especially when the snake barfs up the bad guy and
he winks at the girl) and a complete waste of time. Don't
bother.

Oh my god the giant computerized snake is going to swalllow
and regeratate me, help.

of course that's exactly what happens in this hoorible film,
that only gets worse as it goes a long.

It would be of great generosity to give this film one star.
It has all the perfect ingredients of a horrible film and
probaly for another. Even if you don't know about
anacondas you can tell that the film makers knew very
little about them. it is one of the worst films of the
year and probaly is.

i don't like agreeing with all the critics i
like to have my own seperate opinion. But with a film
this bad i had too.

a 1950s horror film about a sea creature with nine eyes
would have been more realistic.

Wow!This movie was soo bad,that I think Mystery Science
Theater 3000 could have a crack at it.I especially thought
the part when the snake was on fire was pretty cheesy.

yea this movie sucked so bad it was awesome I can't wait
to walk out on the middle of the second one.

I did not like this version of "Anaconda", the other movie
was much better. This movie (like the other one), did make
me lose my apetite. AGAIN! It was pretty cheesy, as was
the acting.