Comments about ‘Weigh in on guns in national parks, wildlife refuges’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Cottonwood High School football coach Josh...
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large sodas...
- Family at first sight: Girl with Down...
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Investigators focus on stains in car of dead...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
29 - Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
25 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
24 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
20 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13






people should be allowed to carry guns to protect themselves from wildlife and other dangerous things.
Some predators walk on four legs some on two. Either way we should be able to protect our selves if needed in a national park as well as our own homes.
If a person legally owns a gun and has taken the time to legally get a permit to carry then the assumption should be that he is a law abiding citizen and should be allowed to carry that weapon as his permit specifies. My family camps out in the mountains a lot and there have been more than a few times when situations arose where having a weapon for self defense would have helped a LOT. I am not talking about OK Corral gunfights; I am talking about close brushes with wildlife that threatened my wife and children.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments