Reader comments
Changes in Texas law applicable to polygamy
3 comments | Read story
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" (First Amendment to the Constitution, extended to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment).
"The test may be stated as follows: what are the purpose and the primary effect of the enactment? If either is the advancement or inhibition of religion then the enactment exceeds the scope of legislative power as circumscribed by the Constitution. That is to say that to withstand the strictures of the Establishment Clause there must be a secular legislative purpose and a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion." ( Supreme Court in Abington School District v. Schempp, 1963)
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Congressional vote on playoffs? 7:51 p.m.
- 2010 World Cup daily schedule 7:24 p.m.
- Notre Dame won't go to a bowl game 7:10 p.m.
- Nebraska could now help TCU 7:09 p.m.
- Cops need help in tool heist 7:08 p.m.
- Source says Flyers fire Stevens 7:07 p.m.
- Murder case starts for juvenile 6:46 p.m.
- Court decision could cost $15M 6:44 p.m.
- West Bountiful fire displaces three 6:25 p.m.
- Ed Smart infuriated with revelations 6:24 p.m.
- Mr. Football 2009: Tuni Kanuch
- Ed Smart infuriated with revelations
- 5A high school football All-State
- Miller predicted Tiger's rough road
- Utah Jazz going green with unis
- 4A high school football: All-State
- Harpring's NBA career is over
- Nutty Putty Cave to be sealed today
- MVPs wrap up stellar prep careers
- Jazz: Miles, Kirilenko to play Friday
- Hall reprimanded by MWC
409 - Max Hall issues apology
393 - Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal
362 - Why is Y. ignoring spew of hatred?
293 - Utes won't respond to Hall
278 - BYU says Hall incident resolved
247 - Letters: Liberal because LDS
235 - 2 citations issued at Y.-U. game
189 - Hate not limited to 1 in-state rivalry
183 - Aggies shoot past Cougars
179
Trolley Square's annual Holiday Open House will feature visits with...
That does it — I'm having an affair! Thanks to Tiger Woods, David...
First, a big thank you to all who posted questions here for me to ask...
"Mormons don't even celebrate advent. What is up with this?" There's...
He just does not have good basketball instincts. I know this is his first...
To the 5:04 comentator, This is a FEDERAL prosecution. It is the entire...
Skousen and Beck? What an utter embarassment! THe fact that we have a panel...
I'm a little surprised by this choice of all-staters. I thought for sure San...
I find it strange when folks suggest that Atheism is a religion of its own....
Would you want to deprive people of all their pet lizards, pet birds, and all...
To: Tim D. | 5:21 a.m. Dec. 3, 2009 You said, "I have one BIG hang up with...
"Light travels faster than sound, which is why someone may appear bright...
I agree, John. And Aaron, it means know what you're talking about before you...



Anyone who is married and not yet divorced and has been living together with another can be charged with polygamy unless they have a Cohabitation agreement.
Living together is grounds for the state to declare a common law marriage.
This could get a large percentage of the population of Texas arrested.