Comments about ‘DUI felon bails out of jail to fix his broken teeth’
Judge says he must stay put until May sentencing date
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large sodas...
- Family at first sight: Girl with Down...
- Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
- Plane crash victims identified
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
31 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
21 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14






I applaud the Judge for her decision. I find it funny that Mr. VanDyke's father was upset at his conviction saying that he never had a chance.
However, with 7 convictions for DUI I would say that he has had multiple chances. It's too bad that he has to be in jail now but those are choices he made.
And if I read the article right, his driving while impaired caused someone their life. Mr. VanDyke is a prime candidate for a DUI registry. I certainly would like to know who he is for my family's safety.
He'll be "popular" in Prison...........
And he'll probably LOSE those new teeth there, so......
I was on the jury. No one on the jury knew about the prior convictions. We suspected that he might have been in this situation before because he knew to "plead the fifth" when asked to take the sobriety tests. We didn't know you COULD refuse a sobriety test. But that was irrelevant. We felt that there was enough evidence from the officers, and other witnesses that he had consumed enough alcohol to be a public safety hazard. We also felt that since he was the only person that knew how much alcohol he drank that day, that he was the best judge of whether he was too drunk to drive and he passed his own judgment by refusing the sobriety tests.
When I found out about his record after the trial I was infuriated that the jury was not allowed to know this information because we very easily could have passed the wrong verdict. At the beginning of deliberations, I think the majority thought was that the case was not strong enough, but after careful consideration of all evidence and two hours of discussion the consensus changed to guilty.
My husband drank a lot & I can tell you they can't help themselves. If he has had 7 DUI's and taken a persons life he shouldn't be on the streets at all, ever!
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments