Deseret News | Domestic partners can begin registering

Reader comments
Domestic partners can begin registering

No | 8:15 a.m. April 17, 2008

It's a start. That's good they're letting domestic partners get benefits. Why not? They need it too.

NotTheSame | 8:24 a.m. April 17, 2008

This problem has only arisen because voters in the past established unfair benefit laws that are biased toward married couples. The state should stop registering marriages and require any domestic partners (gay or straight) to register and show proof that they are dependent on their partner in order to get shared status for benefits. Marriage is a religious institution, nothing more. Contrary to popular belief, it is possible to be committed to a partner without having a marriage license.

All is well in utah | 10:46 a.m. April 17, 2008

The slippery slope continues. The agenda gains more strength.
Satan truly wears the Halloween mask of tolerance.

Comments continue below

lost in DC | 4:28 p.m. April 17, 2008

the slope is getting more slippery

Kevin | 7:25 a.m. April 18, 2008

Well, you know the saying in Utah... If the slope is slippery, ski it. Is that a saying? It should be if it isn't.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.