Reader comments
Ex-FLDS members try to counter claims of persecution
67 comments | Read story
Anonymous | 11:58 a.m. April 15, 2008
why only crickets commenting on this one? Where are all those motherly tears
when their boys are dumped on the side of the road?
Alexander | 12:13 p.m. April 15, 2008
I know little of this church, but if some folks got booted out of it, or they
chose to leave to go get high or to be vagrants, so be it. They have that
choice. A church's leadership has the right to choose its own members.
Anyone in the flock has the right to leave if they want. They even have the
right to ditch the current leadership and start their own church if they're
unhappy.
The same as their families/wives/etc. have the choice to either go with them, or let them go and stay with the church. Truly, ts a wonderful thing we have, Freewill. (Kooky "brainwashing" theories notwithstanding).
The same as their families/wives/etc. have the choice to either go with them, or let them go and stay with the church. Truly, ts a wonderful thing we have, Freewill. (Kooky "brainwashing" theories notwithstanding).
Anonymous | 12:35 p.m. April 15, 2008
And I guess those 14 yr old boys must've all chose to go,huh? Amazing how
consistent their stories are.
Comments continue below
To Alexander | 12:37 p.m. April 15, 2008
Naive would be a misuse of the word to describe you.
They have no choice. They're brainwashed and so it would appear are you.
Warren Jeffs and his lackeys assign the children and women to others. They have no such right to do so but they still do it.
How immature are you?
They have no choice. They're brainwashed and so it would appear are you.
Warren Jeffs and his lackeys assign the children and women to others. They have no such right to do so but they still do it.
How immature are you?
uhmmmm | 12:35 p.m. April 15, 2008
"why only crickets commenting on this one? Where are all those motherly
tears when their boys are dumped on the side of the road?"
Funny though. The crickets speak VOLUMES!
Funny though. The crickets speak VOLUMES!
To Alexander | 12:35 p.m. April 15, 2008
I agree, free will is a wonderful thing. However, I am also incredibly grateful
to our government for putting pressure on my own ancestors to stop practicing
polygamy. Otherwise, I'm afraid I would be living a very similar lifestyle
that the FLDS are living today.
Hopefully, future generations of FLDS people will feel the same gratitude that I do. God bless Texas and the USA!
Hopefully, future generations of FLDS people will feel the same gratitude that I do. God bless Texas and the USA!
DeLaval Milker | 12:46 p.m. April 15, 2008
Alexander...
They have your children. There are manned guard towers. Does this sound like 'anyone in the flocke has the right to leave if they want'? I've been followed by the thugs in the suburbans with tinted windows. They don't seem to be willing to entertain a change in church leadership. Freewill is a wonderful thing. It is more than absent on these compounds.
They have your children. There are manned guard towers. Does this sound like 'anyone in the flocke has the right to leave if they want'? I've been followed by the thugs in the suburbans with tinted windows. They don't seem to be willing to entertain a change in church leadership. Freewill is a wonderful thing. It is more than absent on these compounds.
Re: Alexander | 12:42 p.m. April 15, 2008
How is it a choice to lose your home and family when you have a different
religious opinion? Try reading a little more before making ignorant statements.
Men and their sons are clearly the victims here when you have a few sexual
preditors running deciding who and what your family relations are.
Lori | 12:49 p.m. April 15, 2008
Alexander, you are failing to realize that this is a group that indoctrinates
their people from the cradle---they are told their prophet is all powerful and
has a say over every aspect of your life---they can and do "throw people
out" for no-reason know to anyone but the prophet and his inner
circle--they also literally give wives and children away with the threat of
eternal damnation on both sides----very little free will in this group.
Fairness? | 12:49 p.m. April 15, 2008
Two wrongs do not make a right. Regardless what FLDS did within their own
religion does not give Texas a right to traumatize the children (PTSD anyone?).
Even within Evangelical circles, those who are disinfranchised or bitter or
disagree have a different views of their ex-religion than those in it.. Why
lower ourselves? Texas needs to be moral regardless of what others do.
An0nymouse | 12:54 p.m. April 15, 2008
The big deal in this case is the alleged abuse. Period.
Kids need to be protected, and what applies to the rest of us should apply to the FLDS as well. The state of Texas was within their rights to investigate and if no real proof of abuse is found the kids will be returned to their mothers.
If the FLDS really wanted to straighten this out and be left alone they would wait for their "spiritual" wives to grow up to the legal age of consent before marrying them. The claims of "cult" are always used when people don't understand a religion but it may be applicable here. If the FLDS are not a cult why do they go out of their way to look like one. They are secretive and separatist that willingly break the law (be it bigamy or underage sex).
Everyone has the right to worship god without breaking the law. If they disagree with the law they should fight to get the laws changed and not continue to break them.
Kids need to be protected, and what applies to the rest of us should apply to the FLDS as well. The state of Texas was within their rights to investigate and if no real proof of abuse is found the kids will be returned to their mothers.
If the FLDS really wanted to straighten this out and be left alone they would wait for their "spiritual" wives to grow up to the legal age of consent before marrying them. The claims of "cult" are always used when people don't understand a religion but it may be applicable here. If the FLDS are not a cult why do they go out of their way to look like one. They are secretive and separatist that willingly break the law (be it bigamy or underage sex).
Everyone has the right to worship god without breaking the law. If they disagree with the law they should fight to get the laws changed and not continue to break them.
Lori | 1:04 p.m. April 15, 2008
Who is traumatizing children? Texas, or the FLDS? Is it really ok because this
is a religious group to force (yes, force) girls barely out of their teens into
marriage? How do you expect the State to react? Sit on their hands and let this
keep going on? If some 50 year old slept with your twelve year old daughter
because "God told him to" would you be so forgiving?
Erika | 1:00 p.m. April 15, 2008
How can anyone excuse the horrendous and reprehensible behavior of these FLDS
men? And what about the adult women who have been complicit--FOR YEARS--in
enabling the repetetive rape and forced "spiritual marriages" of their
underage daughters to perverted old men? HUH? How innocent do these mothers
think their daughters will be after a trip to the temple mattress? How is it
that a felonious sub-culture is allowed to flourish in this country, today? The
FLDS is an abomination and should be held accountable (like any other church in
the USA) for their illegal behaviors. If these little girls were anywhere else,
or belonged to any other religion--they would have been removed from their
abusive environment LONG AGO!!! Just because these little girls know no other
home, does not mean that they should be returned to the place of their abuse.
How crazy is that? WHERE ARE THE BOYS AND YOUNG MEN OF THIS COMMUNITY? WE SEE
NO EVIDENCE OF THEM! That's because boys and young men are systematically
exiled from the only homes they know when they begin to pose a threat to the
perverted older men of the community. The older pervs don't want
competition!
Jenny | 1:03 p.m. April 15, 2008
Finally a story that is not biased towards the FLDS
re: Fairness? | 1:04 p.m. April 15, 2008
Yeahhhhh . Let's forgo any PTSD today and let these inbreeding molesters
ruin these lives for their entire lifespan. Ignorance, apathy and disdain for
children. "Don't mess with Texas"
To Fairness? | 1:19 p.m. April 15, 2008
Yes, because taking the kids out of the situation is so much worse than leaving
them on those grounds to continue to be exploited.
You want to talk fairness? Lets be fair. This is the first time something of this calibur has occurred in Texas. There are no policies for something like this and no laws to help them. CPS is doing the best they can considering the circumstances.
Would leaving the children with these people be moral? I say no. Maybe CPS isn't handling this the best way, but they're doing the best they can with what they have. They are the ones working above and beyond the call of duty to try and help in this situation and yet they're the ones being made out as the bad guys.
You want to talk fairness? Lets be fair. This is the first time something of this calibur has occurred in Texas. There are no policies for something like this and no laws to help them. CPS is doing the best they can considering the circumstances.
Would leaving the children with these people be moral? I say no. Maybe CPS isn't handling this the best way, but they're doing the best they can with what they have. They are the ones working above and beyond the call of duty to try and help in this situation and yet they're the ones being made out as the bad guys.
Jessie | 1:34 p.m. April 15, 2008
The most telling phrase in the whole article is: In interviews, the FLDS people
on the YFZ Ranch have refused to address allegations of child abuse and sex
abuse leveled against them."
They moan and cry and say their children are being ripped from their sides... but that wouldn't happen if they didn't sexually and physically abuse them....
I feel like the FLDS is trying to frame this as a witch hunt against polygama when its not--all about child abuse plain and simple. In this day and age no one really cares which adults are sleeping with whom: but a 16 year old girl? Cmon...
They moan and cry and say their children are being ripped from their sides... but that wouldn't happen if they didn't sexually and physically abuse them....
I feel like the FLDS is trying to frame this as a witch hunt against polygama when its not--all about child abuse plain and simple. In this day and age no one really cares which adults are sleeping with whom: but a 16 year old girl? Cmon...
Anonymous | 1:39 p.m. April 15, 2008
There have always been crazy cultists in the world who believe they must be
separate from the rest, and somehow better, and there will always be some odd
cult or the other that will continue to come to light, and go back underground.
Sugarlips | 2:05 p.m. April 15, 2008
Hallelujah, a story that isn't FLDS propaganda!
REALITY | 2:18 p.m. April 15, 2008
Wow, I loved the comment in this article:
"They howl and cry that they're being ripped away from this wonderful family condition they're in when they've got blood on their hands.
So True.......
"They howl and cry that they're being ripped away from this wonderful family condition they're in when they've got blood on their hands.
So True.......
tanob | 2:23 p.m. April 15, 2008
First of all.. WHy is it that when a 15 year old gets pregnant anywhere in the
USA, no one bats an eyelash.. But when a 15yr old gets pregnant AND is involved
in some kind of religous act, they say its ABUSE and take the kids from their
families!??!??!! i dont get it! Is it because she is married at 15? and that is
the wrong deed here? Why??? sounds to me like she is being responsible for her
actions by getting married FIRST! Just because a girl gets married at 15
doesn't make it a "forced" act.. Believe it or not, there are
mature 15 year olds out there! everyone just needs to leave them alone! and let
them believe what they believe! hello.. free country!!!!!
SueM | 2:25 p.m. April 15, 2008
Anderson Cooper from Cnn interviewed a Sect woman last night..She would not
answer any questions and avoided everything and Just kept saying she wanted her
children and grandchild back
Anderson asked her how many kids she had and there ages
She had 5 kids the oldest girl being 18 with a 10 month old child.. So how old was this girl when she was married off and which old man is the father of this young child
Anderson asked her how many kids she had and there ages
She had 5 kids the oldest girl being 18 with a 10 month old child.. So how old was this girl when she was married off and which old man is the father of this young child
CB | 2:38 p.m. April 15, 2008
Just because it happened to someone else may make it ironic, but certainly not
right. I am concerned that under state authority, with inaccurate information,
the state of Texas can violate a person(s) constitutional rights. The girl
wasn't even in Texas and they still can't find her. The man accused
was not even in Texas, and what are they going to do for these children that
will be better for them--Put them in foster homes where they will really be
mistreated and abused?
Re:Tanob | 2:50 p.m. April 15, 2008
You say 15 like that is the youngest they go. Not true my friend.
But if you want to talk 15- let's talk 15. Problem is it's with OLDER or shall I say OLD men. If that happened anywhere else- the parents would be upset- not happy- AND the men would be punished. Hello- have you not seen headlines about men going to jail for bedding with someone under 18??? Open your eyes and stop thinking this is about religion. It's not.
But if you want to talk 15- let's talk 15. Problem is it's with OLDER or shall I say OLD men. If that happened anywhere else- the parents would be upset- not happy- AND the men would be punished. Hello- have you not seen headlines about men going to jail for bedding with someone under 18??? Open your eyes and stop thinking this is about religion. It's not.
CA | 2:45 p.m. April 15, 2008
And,,,,
"American taxpayers have unwittingly helped finance a polygamist sect that is now the focus of a massive child abuse investigation in West Texas, with a business tied to the group receiving a nearly $1 million loan from the federal government and $1.2 million in military contracts."
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
"American taxpayers have unwittingly helped finance a polygamist sect that is now the focus of a massive child abuse investigation in West Texas, with a business tied to the group receiving a nearly $1 million loan from the federal government and $1.2 million in military contracts."
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Think Again | 2:54 p.m. April 15, 2008
CNN is one channel that has stayed totally biased against the FLDS. Look into
the true background and lives of the people who are so outspoken
"against" the FLDS. Maybe they are hiding their own sins by crying
foul play against others!
From Napoleon Hill "No accurate thinker will judge another person by that which the other person's enemies say about him."
From Napoleon Hill "No accurate thinker will judge another person by that which the other person's enemies say about him."
Alexander | 3:02 p.m. April 15, 2008
To Erika: I've seen all kinds of pictures of boys and young men. Playing
kickball, walking around, smiling, hugging their mothers. I don't know what
you're talking about, suggesting that there aren't any boys.
To others: "brainwashing" is something that people use when they can't bear to admit that other people think differently than they do. So it *must* be brainwashing, yeah thats it.
IF (and thats a big if), there were any *minor* boys that were forcibly kicked out and abandoned, then yes, the mothers of those boys have some serious explaining and possible jail time to do.
But once again, so many of you lump all these people into one mindless borg collective - where the sins of one or a few get transferred to every single person. If the state has charges against individuals, then let them file them! But the state has no right to effect mass detainments in concentration camps, nor to detain children en masse with no real probable cause other than anonymous accusers who they (still) can't produce.
To others: "brainwashing" is something that people use when they can't bear to admit that other people think differently than they do. So it *must* be brainwashing, yeah thats it.
IF (and thats a big if), there were any *minor* boys that were forcibly kicked out and abandoned, then yes, the mothers of those boys have some serious explaining and possible jail time to do.
But once again, so many of you lump all these people into one mindless borg collective - where the sins of one or a few get transferred to every single person. If the state has charges against individuals, then let them file them! But the state has no right to effect mass detainments in concentration camps, nor to detain children en masse with no real probable cause other than anonymous accusers who they (still) can't produce.
CB | 3:04 p.m. April 15, 2008
If a police officer pulls you over for a burned out tail light and finds you
holding an open can of beer, would you expect the officer to simply ignore the
beer in your hand?
Texas authorities received several calls from a girl claiming that she was being sexually abused at the YFZ Ranch.
When authorities investigated the ranch, they found other 16 y/o or younger girls who were either pregnant or were already mothers -- suggesting possible child sexual abuse.
Whether the original phone call was anonymous or not, whether it was from a real victim, or just somebody's idea to get authorities to investigate, once the authorities discovered possible cases of abuse they were obligated to remove EVERY child who was potentially being abused or at risk of being abused.
It's a terrible situation for those children to be separated from their parents, but it's better than leaving them to be abused forever.
Texas authorities received several calls from a girl claiming that she was being sexually abused at the YFZ Ranch.
When authorities investigated the ranch, they found other 16 y/o or younger girls who were either pregnant or were already mothers -- suggesting possible child sexual abuse.
Whether the original phone call was anonymous or not, whether it was from a real victim, or just somebody's idea to get authorities to investigate, once the authorities discovered possible cases of abuse they were obligated to remove EVERY child who was potentially being abused or at risk of being abused.
It's a terrible situation for those children to be separated from their parents, but it's better than leaving them to be abused forever.
Josh | 3:29 p.m. April 15, 2008
Alexander said: "church's leadership has the right to choose its own
members."
Right, but let me ask you this: do they have the right to take children (and a wife) away from their father (/husband)?
Tanob said: "WHy is it that when a 15 year old gets pregnant anywhere in the USA, no one bats an eyelash.. But when a 15yr old gets pregnant AND is involved in some kind of religous act, they say its ABUSE and take the kids from their families!??!??!!"
My reply to this is that statutory rape is against the law. Odds are that the 15 year old girl anywhere in the U.S. made the decision on her own to have sex. Plus, a person under the age of 18 is not considered an adult, so therefore having sex with an adult constitutes statutory rape on the part of the adult. The 15 year old in this case did not make the same choice.
Right, but let me ask you this: do they have the right to take children (and a wife) away from their father (/husband)?
Tanob said: "WHy is it that when a 15 year old gets pregnant anywhere in the USA, no one bats an eyelash.. But when a 15yr old gets pregnant AND is involved in some kind of religous act, they say its ABUSE and take the kids from their families!??!??!!"
My reply to this is that statutory rape is against the law. Odds are that the 15 year old girl anywhere in the U.S. made the decision on her own to have sex. Plus, a person under the age of 18 is not considered an adult, so therefore having sex with an adult constitutes statutory rape on the part of the adult. The 15 year old in this case did not make the same choice.
re: tanob | 3:35 p.m. April 15, 2008
Based on the poor logic used by so many individuals I have to wonder if FLDS
members are posting under the guise of sympathetic outsiders. To answer your
question, Tanob, the reason nobody "bats an eyelash" when a 15 year
old gets pregnant somewhere else in this country is because it is usually by a
boy close to her age. But anytime a 15 year old girl gets pregnant by somebody
over 18 it is illegal. Don't be so ignorant as to think we don't
prosecute them as well. Perhaps you could share this with your buddies back at
the compound.
And so it goes | 3:37 p.m. April 15, 2008
Why do these cults give so much power away to their patriarchs?
Don't they know this is ultimately what always happens?
Don't they know this is ultimately what always happens?
FLDS vs Mormon church? | 3:45 p.m. April 15, 2008
Just where would we be today if we had not followed the Prophet and obeyed the
laws of the land? Let's see, no David A, no Brooke White, no Schwimmers,
no Osmond's, no Julianne and Derick Hough, and no Mitt Romney's.
There was a time and a season, and it is not the season anymore. Plural
marriage was a great part in helping these women who were without husbands, due
to death, in getting across the plains. Time eventually tells the story, those
who chose not to follow the council of the Prophet in the late 1800's are
in trouble with the law and may lose their children. Oh and Tanob, a 15 year
old girl with and 18 year old boy is statutory rape, a 15 year old girl with a
50 year old man is that plus sick and wrong.
To Fairness? | 3:41 p.m. April 15, 2008
"Texas should be moral?"
They are, they got a complaint, they acted on it, and found probable cause. What don't you understand about that.
They are, they got a complaint, they acted on it, and found probable cause. What don't you understand about that.
Signs of Abuse | 4:41 p.m. April 15, 2008
Just a few thoughts. I don't wish to absolve any of the fathers or mothers
in this situation, but it is obvious that the leadership of this religion has
been inculcating their followers for generations, and so most of the blame must
lie with Warren Jeffs and his ilk. If these people had been taught to honor and
obey the laws of the land (in other words, sex with minors/children is BAD,
domestic abuse is BAD, etc.), there would be no problem with these people
regardless of how strange their other beliefs might be. It is a bitter irony
that they now have such contempt for the very laws and agencies that could
protect them and their children from such abuses. Furthermore, when these
agencies try to enforce the law and offer that protection, their hands are
slapped away. These people are showing classic signs of being in an abusive
relationship with their religious leadership. Unfortunately, there are complex
constitutional rights involved here, and I can only hope that Texas handles this
situation carefully, especially for the children's sake.
californian | 4:46 p.m. April 15, 2008
tanob and others:
People keep saying it is a problem because of the vast difference in age of the girls and their husbands etc.. That is an oversimplification. The problem is that in this situation it is not a case (or many cases) of youthful indiscretion, but rather an INSTITUTIONAL practice. Kids all over are getting pregnant (and it is detrimental to our economy and society), but most of them are not being commanded to do so. Here is a provocative question for some of you thinkers out there. If polygamy was legal, and subject to all the same laws as legal marriage is today, and all these men were legally responsible for their wives and children whether the prophet said so or not, might that not open this society up a bit? If not for the underage and child abuse aspect, who gives a rodent's posterior how many women the guy next door can score with as long as I'm getting mine? And isn't that at least a small part of this problem...someone somewhere doesn't think it is fair for some geezer to be getting more action than they are?
People keep saying it is a problem because of the vast difference in age of the girls and their husbands etc.. That is an oversimplification. The problem is that in this situation it is not a case (or many cases) of youthful indiscretion, but rather an INSTITUTIONAL practice. Kids all over are getting pregnant (and it is detrimental to our economy and society), but most of them are not being commanded to do so. Here is a provocative question for some of you thinkers out there. If polygamy was legal, and subject to all the same laws as legal marriage is today, and all these men were legally responsible for their wives and children whether the prophet said so or not, might that not open this society up a bit? If not for the underage and child abuse aspect, who gives a rodent's posterior how many women the guy next door can score with as long as I'm getting mine? And isn't that at least a small part of this problem...someone somewhere doesn't think it is fair for some geezer to be getting more action than they are?
Fredd | 5:06 p.m. April 15, 2008
Its a myth Mormons practised polygamy because women were widowed and there were
not enough men. It is also a myth that children married at 14 in the mid
1800's. All this info is available online. The average age of menstration
in 1850 was 16.5 years. Better nutrition is suspected of lowering the age as
time has passed. early Mormons were marrying other men's wives. No
offense just the facts.
snickerdoodle | 5:07 p.m. April 15, 2008
Ha ha ha!
See what I've been telling you all along!
"They took these kids out because they physically saw and found abuse." (Carolyn Jessop)
Wow. What a revelation.
*listen to snickerdoodle!*
See what I've been telling you all along!
"They took these kids out because they physically saw and found abuse." (Carolyn Jessop)
Wow. What a revelation.
*listen to snickerdoodle!*
curious | 5:34 p.m. April 15, 2008
I am curious, in another story it was stated that there were a couple dozen
adolescent boys who were seperated from the main group of children today. Now,
in a group that includes over 400 kids wouldn't you expect more than a
couple dozen would be adolescent boys. I wonder where are all the teenage boys
in this group?
uh huh | 5:43 p.m. April 15, 2008
Alexander: are you seriously claiming that there are no "lost boys"
and no boys have been kicked out?
To Tanob | 6:37 p.m. April 15, 2008
It is different because many times if a fifteen year old (or younger) gets
pregnant in the general public she has help from various areas. She can get
help sometimes through her family, school system, counselors and advise
regarding adoption etc. If an older man is involved prosecution can be brought
in a court of law. The girls in the FLDS community are often forced into
marriage to a much older man and are told that it is their duty according to
"God". If they refuse, they are punished or perhaps kicked out of
their family. They do not have their free will usually and are
"brainwashed". It's very easy to see the difference between them
and a struggling young person in the general public!
Tommi | 8:32 p.m. April 15, 2008
I've heard from more than one source that only the first wife and children
of a polygamist are the husband's financial responsibility. The tax-payers
support all of his other wives and children because the mothers are considered
single parents. Gee, what a racket these good Christians have going... Lots of
young wives, no financial responsibility for them... Sex and more sex! We need
to clean out all of these "ranches" and enclaves. Save the
children!!!
Freehold | 10:35 p.m. April 15, 2008
The Deseret News is censuring comments on this forum. They have refused to
publish mine though there was nothing abusive, offensive, off-topic, etc. Please
do not think these comments are representative of opinions the News does not
want to here.
Jen Shostak | 11:14 p.m. April 15, 2008
I truly feel sorry for all of the people who claim to have been harmed by their
experiences in the FLDS. However, their hatred for the FLDS and its members
blinds them to a more important truth: That each person in the United States,
regardless of how despicable their conduct, is entitled to due process of law,
equal protection of the law, and all of the rights set forth in the Bill of
Rights forming the Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
I am sickened by the illiteracy of a large majority of the posters on the Deseret News and Salt Lake Tribune website. Each adult and child who is a member of the FLDS has these constitutional rights.
I am sickened by the illiteracy of a large majority of the posters on the Deseret News and Salt Lake Tribune website. Each adult and child who is a member of the FLDS has these constitutional rights.
Anonymous | 11:12 p.m. April 15, 2008
Not only is statutory rape illegal but polygamy is against the law. The US army
almost went to war with the LDS church over the polygamy issue. I have sympathy
for the kids of the FLDS, they did not choose their family. The parents however,
know that they are breaking the law and also being immoral by allowing their
young children to be married to old geisers.
Embarassed to Be LDS | 11:51 p.m. April 15, 2008
"Just where would we be today if we had not followed the Prophet and obeyed
the laws of the land? Let's see, no David A, no Brooke White, no
Schwimmers, no Osmond's, no Julianne and Derick Hough, and no Mitt
Romney's."
COME ON !! The Church is never going to get anywhere with its members saying the most ODD things, in the most public of places. The problem with the Church is the smartest members shut-the-heck-up, and the good hearted dumb bells open their mouths and make the rest of us look like weirdos.
Here's a hint to online posting. If you can see a General Authority saying it -on-line- post your thought. If you can't imagine a GA posting it.... please don't.
COME ON !! The Church is never going to get anywhere with its members saying the most ODD things, in the most public of places. The problem with the Church is the smartest members shut-the-heck-up, and the good hearted dumb bells open their mouths and make the rest of us look like weirdos.
Here's a hint to online posting. If you can see a General Authority saying it -on-line- post your thought. If you can't imagine a GA posting it.... please don't.
Why America? | 12:06 a.m. April 16, 2008
Sad. Sad our government has to once again go through the same problem that
should have been taken care of correctly in the prior Brigham Young era. In
that time period there were 200 men who were jailed for their wrongdoings. The
response from the women then was a huge media frenzy that they needed to have
their husbands brought back to their households since the men were their sole
providers for them, their (typically) multiple children, their jointed co-wives
and their kin.
I don't think the use of tanks was the best way to approach the situation, but hopefully this time it will send a clearer message that child molest/polygamy/incest/ and possibly rape ARE NOT tolerated in the US of A. In Africa and many other countries there are common young arranged marriages/cases of abuse/rape and statuates that men have more authority than women (let's not go into that)... but focus on the issue.
AMERICA already has enough problems with sexual predators please don't encourage more of them.
I don't think the use of tanks was the best way to approach the situation, but hopefully this time it will send a clearer message that child molest/polygamy/incest/ and possibly rape ARE NOT tolerated in the US of A. In Africa and many other countries there are common young arranged marriages/cases of abuse/rape and statuates that men have more authority than women (let's not go into that)... but focus on the issue.
AMERICA already has enough problems with sexual predators please don't encourage more of them.
Lisa | 12:18 a.m. April 16, 2008
Here in AZ there have been many stories in the newspaper and TV news, of women
who left Colorado City and the FLDS, and they all tell the same stories of
abuse. Carolyn Jessop's book ("Escape") relates the very same
pattern. Indeed, this is about abuse. And IT IS happening in Texas, Colorado
City, and Canada. I don't know how in the world Texas is going to sort
through this mess but if it is ever going to happen anywhere, it will happen
there. Arizona and Utah are a joke. The laws are ignored, welfare fraud and
abuse continue. Go Texas. "Ya'll" are heroes. Don't give
up the fight to protect these kids.
Rich | 1:04 a.m. April 16, 2008
Fredd, Perhaps you yourself should check the facts before spouting off. A visit
to any cemetery in America will show that many girls married at 15 to 17 years
of age, and many of them had children at 16 and 17. Their husbands were usually
no more than five years older than they were, and the practice was not only
legal but also common. Many Mormon women were widowed, and often those women
were married off, even assigned to be married, to polygamous men. I've
read many instances of this in old family histories. In the Martin and Willie
handcart companies, men often died while leaving their wives behind because they
required more food and didn't get it or shared it with their wives and
children. Someday you should visit the historical handcart sites in Wyoming and
learn some of the stories about those Saints who had to walk across the plains
and mountains when an early winter hit. Regardless of the reason for polygamy
before 1890, it was practiced in the Mormon Church and then was banned and
eventually eliminated in the church. It wasn't an easy change with many
Mormons, even leaders, refusing to accept the ban.
Thanks Rich! | 4:25 a.m. April 16, 2008
Rich,
Thanks for stating that so eloquently. My ancestor was there helping to rescue the Martin and Willie companies.
The definition of what is a child has changed over time. There is really no cut and dried answer as to when a person is old enough to make decisions like marriage, although the state specifies an age today.
I think most religions have some element of control. In the mainstream LDS religion, I see plenty of cases of manipulation. Who is qualified to say when a child is freely making their own decisions? Should the state of Texas step in to support children who are being forced to go to Sunday School?
Thanks for stating that so eloquently. My ancestor was there helping to rescue the Martin and Willie companies.
The definition of what is a child has changed over time. There is really no cut and dried answer as to when a person is old enough to make decisions like marriage, although the state specifies an age today.
I think most religions have some element of control. In the mainstream LDS religion, I see plenty of cases of manipulation. Who is qualified to say when a child is freely making their own decisions? Should the state of Texas step in to support children who are being forced to go to Sunday School?
Incognito | 5:01 a.m. April 16, 2008
Quote"WHERE ARE THE BOYS AND YOUNG MEN OF THIS COMMUNITY? WE SEE NO
EVIDENCE OF THEM! That's because boys and young men are systematically
exiled from the only homes they know when they begin to pose a threat to the
perverted older men of the community.
Erika This only goes to prove that you know NOTHING about FLDS. We are normal people with normal often dull lives,i would like to know why you assume that the Temples are for orgy purposes on helpless young girls,Where did you acquire this supposed knowledge?where are your facts that this was even taking place?You know NOTHING.As for seeing evidence of young males in our community--what do you cruise every house on every day documenting this?It may be dissapointing to you but older men do have more things on their minds than sex.
Erika This only goes to prove that you know NOTHING about FLDS. We are normal people with normal often dull lives,i would like to know why you assume that the Temples are for orgy purposes on helpless young girls,Where did you acquire this supposed knowledge?where are your facts that this was even taking place?You know NOTHING.As for seeing evidence of young males in our community--what do you cruise every house on every day documenting this?It may be dissapointing to you but older men do have more things on their minds than sex.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
Related content
- Korver's return hits snag 12:59 p.m.
- Salt Lake City woman shot 12:53 p.m.
- Woman suffers critical injury 12:50 p.m.
- China vows to slow emissions 12:18 p.m.
- Baseball player on mission in Wash. 12:10 p.m.
- Foundation for LDS young women 12:10 p.m.
- Robotic hamsters are the new craze 11:47 a.m.
- Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies 11:27 a.m.
- Prevent problems by spaying dogs 11:01 a.m.
- Turkeys lurking in your home 11:00 a.m.
- Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies
- Cave rescuers committed to free man
- Holiday television program listings
- Rivalry has had some 'turkeys'
- Twitterati to BCS: 'We hate you.'
- Howard made the rivalry a rivalry
- Temple Square to use LEDs
- Highland players make special friend
- Donny and Kym dance to victory
- BYU has slim shot at BCS
- BYU would like friendlier rivalry
261 - Glenn Beck to enter politics?227
- Protests against Phoenix LDS temple210
- RSL wins MLS Cup on penalty kicks202
- Bronco, Kyle rubber match139
- BYU records with win133
- Letters: Rushing to judge Palin131
- Thunder rolls by Jazz125
- Boys basketball rankings114
- Editorial: Poor welcome for Palin112
Latest comments
Do not close the cave. Zion National Park experiences one to two fatalities...
Utes change? The DimWhit Utes can't change anything....lets just hope they...
Yes, thank you to Col. Tueller. I understand the horrors of war a little...
Korver will be needed more than "ever" to start giving the opponents to be...
My sincere condolences to the family. You will be in my thoughts and prayers....
To the family of this young man, I am so sorry for your loss. I have been...
What the hold up? It is this little thing called the economy. perhaps you...
I always thought the left was supposed to be the BIG TENT where everyone was...
Conservatives want this war. Let them pay for it.
I do not believe that nothing will change. If it does not change for this...
Advertisements