Deseret News | Reader comments: Downtown rents are headed up

Reader comments
Downtown rents are headed up

The ARE Other Choices | 12:29 a.m. March 27, 2008

What hubris! Do these buildings have contracted buyers and renters for all this space? Nah! But they are gonna charge such and such while the demand for high priced digs is contracting. These developers are a bunch of comedians.

yea so.. | 4:32 a.m. March 27, 2008

This is nothing new, rent is going up everywhere. It's called GREED!

Grow up | 8:03 a.m. March 27, 2008

Dear "The(re) Are Other Choices" and "yea so." What do you want?? A downtown that continues to deteriorates like so many other US cities that are ugly and unsafe or a bright new 21st century model for the world. What greed?? It's called the market. Grow up.

Comments continue below

Why | 8:32 a.m. March 27, 2008

Why would anyone pay 35% over market rates (a fact "Grow up" doesn't seem to comprehend) for a poor location like that? Bingham's comment about needing to charge extra to pay for copper, steel and concrete seems pretty naive. I've heard they've had big problems pre-leasing and now I understand why.

dingo | 8:50 a.m. March 27, 2008

supply side economics aside if you want to attract people to downtown you donï¿½t price out the largest block of potential residents. the reality is everything has a price but Salt Lake is not Las Vegas, Beverly Hills, or upper Manhattan (posh, upscale, lifestyle destination cities). $400,000 dollars for a small dwelling in downtown Salt Lake is simply not reasonable. yes downtown needs to be revitalized and yes investors should see a maximum return on their dollar but at what long term cost? Salt Lake is already in danger of becoming San Francisco or Seattle (ultra liberal and anti family values) hopefully the mortgage issues that plague the housing market will help bring prices back to earth and inject some much needed clarity into the situation. if it doesnï¿½t then Salt Lake will continue to price itself into oblivion because the ultra rich wont come here to live (without sacrificing the very principles Salt Lake was founded on), and a scorned populace has a long, long memory and that is the reality.

Anonymous | 9:39 a.m. March 27, 2008

>>Salt Lake is already in danger of becoming San Francisco or Seattle (ultra liberal and anti family values) >>

We can only hope!

And when a bunch of high income professionals are living in their $400K condos, and contributing to certain politicians' campaigns, maybe THEN we will finally have reasonable liquor laws.

its all about the drink! :)

SLC'er | 11:56 a.m. March 27, 2008

I like your style 9:39

Supply Side ?? | 12:29 p.m. March 27, 2008

I think I would go else where and let them go Bankrupt

2ndHomer | 1:17 p.m. March 27, 2008

I think you should remember that there are many boomers/empty-nesters who will be (or already are) in the market for a vacation home or a pied-a'-terre. What SLC is building in its downtown renovation will fit that bill for many. Myself included. The plans look beautiful and I hope I can be one to call downtown SLC home within the coming years.

Hard Bargain | 1:51 p.m. March 27, 2008

2ndHomer,

Make sure you don't over pay. This thing won't be moving in the economic environment going forward. Utah county is awash in empty commercial real estate

Basic Economics | 2:44 p.m. March 27, 2008

Why all the venom? Nobody pays the manufacturers suggested retail price. No matter what developers/potential residents say, basic supply and demand will ultimately determine the price.

In the meantime, it's nice to see Utah's premier downtown area being revitatilized with developments that will be enjoyed by citizens throughout the state.

HJ | 3:44 p.m. March 27, 2008

It's interesting that the SLTrib covered this story as a positive regarding the development of SLC while the DNews puts a negative spin regarding higher costs. Is there an ulterior motive?

IN the East Bay Area | 7:27 p.m. March 27, 2008

I pay 1,035/month for a 1 bdrm 1 bthrm apartment in a nice complex.... something I would expect to pay around 500-600/month in SLC. THATS HIGH RENT! And what is so anti family about san Francisco and Seattle? Both of those cities made the top 10 cleanest cities list last week? Beautiful cities with lots of hard working people.

BH | 11:07 p.m. March 27, 2008

Why do we have a mortgage crisis? One reason is that you have to earn twice the average income to be able to afford a 225,000 condo. Real estate continues to skyrocket while wages go down. Even Forrest Gump could figure out that this bubble will burst someday.

Agree with Why | 8:02 a.m. March 28, 2008

So Bruce Bingham admits that the $32-$35/square foot rates for the new 222 building are way above the current $26/square foot market rates (and probably headed down with the coming recession) and he believes people will pay that because he needs to pay for his copper? Good luck finding gullible tenants to pay those exorbitant rates, Bruce.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.