Reader comments
House panel told public lands overrun by ORVs

8 comments   |   Read story

Dave | 7:54 a.m. March 16, 2008
It is obvious that the majority of public land users prefer motorized transportation.
Edward | 11:09 a.m. March 16, 2008
Last week, I took a hike on BLM and National Forest lands a few miles from my home. A gate which prevents off-road vehicles (ORVs)from entering a designated foot and horseback trail had been vandalized. ORV tracks had damaged the tread of the trail. I observed ORV's being operated in an area specifically closed to their use. No enforcement officers were around. This kind of situation is becoming common on public lands all over the West. The Committee witnesses are right, ORV abuse is out of control. The BLM and Forest Service have actually shrunk their law enforcement programs as ORV use has skyrocketed, and the violators are not just a "Few bad apples" as the ORV industry claims. The much touted route designation planning by BLM and the Forest Service is going to be an empty shell unless they get a credible enforcement program back into play. And, even if "Dave" is right and most public land users prefer motorized access, these individuals have no right to damage public land resources, and harass other public land users and private landowners.
Tim | 11:38 a.m. March 16, 2008
Wrong, Dave. Only 4-8% of public lands visitors are off-roaders. The immense damage they do just makes it look like they're the majority...
Comments continue below
dvs | 12:02 p.m. March 16, 2008
In many parts of Utah the federal land managers are part of the problem. To avoid confrontation they rarely write tickets and they reward use of illegal routes by making them legal. State and county law enforcement are no better. If Rob Bishop is truly against ORV trespass on private property, he should pay attention to what a certain Box Elder County commissioner has been doing, right in his back yard.
Dwayne | 4:41 p.m. March 20, 2008
Utah offers more orv trails than anyplace I know. It's very easy to go for long trips without getting off trail. By far more offroad riders use these trails than hikers, however I'm always glad to have a friendly chat with anyone we meet on these very remote trails. The only ones not happy are the ones that never use any trails in any form. I would be more than happy to hike with any of them on the same trails I ride for we never see anyone. There simply is no conflict.
Dave | 2:41 p.m. March 23, 2008
If the people who are or advocate closing existing roads and trails continue there will just be more riding in places that are critical. take away the places and roads we have is not going to work there are more and more people in ohvs every day. I dont see very many people hiking or horeback riding where I ride. most prefer motorized transportation.
Ray | 10:12 a.m. March 31, 2008
I hear this argument over and over - motorized users saying they never see hikers or horseback riders. Have they ever thought that perhaps hikers & horseback riders tend to avoid places overrun by motorized use? I go hiking for solitude, not for interaction with the noise & dust of motorized vehicles, and it's getting more difucult to find that solitude.

Also the violent tone some of the motorized rhetoric doesn't encourage me to seek the companionship of motorized users. At a recent Forest Service hearing in western Montana the situation turned ugly when a motorized user threatened an advocate for quiet recreational opportunities. There is indeed conflict when intimidation is used as an attempt to stifle opposing views.
Jawks-a-voicing | 6:02 p.m. May 4, 2008
Hmmm well I must agree with Ray on the hiker/horseback view. I've been trail riding a number of times because of the leisure effect it has. I never enjoyed coming across a road not only because it sucks you back into the fast paced reality (which you were trying to avoid) but it can also startle the horses and create a danger. Being disturbed on the trail doesn't seem even more exciting. The places I went to were designed for horse back riding but occasionally a park ranger would come up and their disturbance was done.


I've been riding before and although I didn't do anything illegal if I had and not been corrected I probably would continue breaking the rules and probably would have caused damage even though I knew it was wrong. I wouldn't have any excuse except for just being in the moment and not thinking of the consequences. Not a very strong defense.

But I also have to agree that the enforcement officers aren't helping and are actually making things worse. Not enforcing the law has a long-term negative effect on not only the environment but the land's and park's reputation as well.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: C02 causes warming

You can achive your objectives, how? Don't just say we must get rid of...

BYU would like friendlier rivalry

I think both fans could tone it down. I don't mind taunting as long as we...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

For the Millers,if times are tough, here is how you can save around 4 million...

Howard made the rivalry a rivalry

My uncle had a U flag in his front yard last year, notice I say had? After...

'Ninja Assassin' way over the top

the movie is based very loosely on the Shogun Assasin movies (which were the...

Seattle University.

If BYU were such a special place to coach basketball, Steve Cleveland would...

Cougars overpower S. Utah

Alexis Kaufusi is AMazing! You go Girl!

What is there to judge? Oh yeah, not being there for her daughter and now...

Police increase presence at Skyline

lets be honest, if this happened at a west side school, there would not be...

Advertisements