Reader comments
Being a black student at BYU can be difficult
231 comments | Read story
But it WAS. The OFFICIAL POLICY AND DOCTRINE of the Church for over 100 years was RACIST.
That cannot be denied or explained away.
Our ONLY choice is to admit that the Church and its Leaders were WRONG about the racist policy and doctrines!
That is all there is to it. All your attempts at apologetics, explanation, and red herrings only go to show you are all STILL RACIST because you won't admit that the Church's racism was WRONG! You explain it away, or excuse it, or blame it on God.
Just admit it was WRONG and that the Church was WRONG. Just admit it!
There was an Asian who served as an assitant to the twelve. It has been a long time since one could call the general authorities lilly white.
It probably would have been advantageous to say nothing, to say we just don't know, and, [as] with many religious matters...But some explanations were given and had been given for a lot of years. � At the very least, there should be no effort to perpetuate those efforts to explain why that doctrine existed."
If mormons are racist why do they allow people of all races to be endowed-meaning they are entitled to all the blessings of God, exaltation, etc. ? If a church offers its highest reward to you regardless of race, wouldn't that make them race-champions?
Love to hear your response.
Until most church members have had a black priesthood leader blacks will feel marginalized in the church. That day is still in the far distant future in much of Utah.
If you think you are so perfect are you not racist againist a religion?
Racism is taught from the youth, you want racist go to Southern Georgia. Where even today GOD FEARIN Baptist, Pentecostal, Mormon and Catholic calls Blacks the N-word.
If you notice I showed all religions. My family came from this area, my mother taught me to NOT BE racist. In fact when I went back I would end up in fights defending black kids. What did I get in return? Racist comments from the kids I just defended.
I get tired of you bigots and racist bashing the church. You are no better than the ones that you accuse.
However I have to say BYU can not be false if the church is true. BYU has problems, but it tries to grow and reflect the church.
If it were not for BYU than where would people who want to do scholarly defences of the Book of Mormon practice. I can cite lots of other issues, like how the MTC would run without BYU. However I think we should not try to seperate the church from a institution it fully supports.
BYU is not infalible, and its leaders do make mistakes, and it may accept man-made standards too much, but to say it is false is just not justifiable.
Anyway, I do not see how such an attack relates to the article. The article is all about BYU attempting to reach out to minorities. Maybe there are those who feel more can be done, but no one denies that BYU tries.
Any person of any race can be a member of the church, and, receive all the ordinances of the Gospel. Hence, any person of any race is limitless in potential for advancement in God's kingdom. To be plain, no one is denied anything due to race, and, all people can be heirs to Heaven through Christ.
Some would jam their opinion down your throat, I will simply let you decide: is that racist doctrine?
While some members of the LDS faith are indeed racist, Jesus is not. As long as we are part of his church we are helping ourselves become more like him, less racist or any ist for that matter. It is a lot better for a racist to be going to church than not. Any feedback that helps us get better is welcome.
Countless individuals in the Church, BYU, and other organizations are "racist" in various ways and degrees. No question.
But institutionalized racism is the kind that the Church practiced for so long. Institutionalized racism is having a policy and supporting doctrine that systematically denies privileges, responsibilities, ordinances, etc. to groups of individuals because of their race.
There is also NO DOUBT that the LDS Church was guilty of institutionalized racism for over 100 years, until the 1978 declaration changed that. What the declaration did NOT do, however, is apologize or condemn the institutionalized racism up to that point. In fact, all we have received since then are excuses and explanations that are even more offensive. "The white man wasn't ready for it." That is just a way of excusing the mistakes of the leaders. Give me a break - Brigham Young said such racist things simply because "white man wasn't ready"??? Don't insult our intelligence, and your own as well. Racism was NEVER of God. Period.
I think some people actually get a kick out of seeing how many responses they can get to their 'jabs'.
For various reasons, many of them compelling, we've elevated race-based hatefulness to the highest level of disfavor. Unfortunately, some people seem to think that as long as they're on the right side of racial issues, they can be as obnoxious as they want in any other category. Exhibit "A" would be a former attorney colleague of mine, who served on a local commission dealing with race relations and related issues. He also happened to be one of the most thoroughly malicious people I've ever known.
Regarding the Church--we, like others have a history, some of it isn't sterling. We're all learning and if we believe in Revelation as we say we do, we have to allow for growth and change. Peter had to be taught that the Gospel could go to non-Jews.
It is difficult to be a minority anywhere. I sympathize.
But, to think that the Brethren thought they had all the answers is to misrepresent the Brethren. People have interpreted what they said as meaning one thing or another and that isn't fair.
"How can someone say there have not been black leaders in the church. There has been a black general authority."
I think your second sentence answers the first. "A" black general authority...out of hundreds.
And the commenter you were replying to was referring to the public face of church leadership; you talk about assistants to the twelve and lower level leadership. But I think the commenter had the quorum of the 12, the presidency of the 70, the presiding Bishopric, and possibly the first quorum of 70 in mind. Racially, that's not a very diverse group.
I spent 8 years as an independent LDS bookseller and I know this has been true for at least the last decade (probably much longer)
BUT, the Church also teaches that our leaders are inspired to direct the Church - a Church that contains the fullness of the Gospel. A fullness that will be expanded upon THROUGH our inspired leaders.
This reality makes it VERY difficult to criticize any actions or comments of former leaders. Changing practice or policy has been the only means of remedy. And there is no question that the Church of today has changed a GREAT deal from the Church of JS and BY.
Once the Church starts pointing to past leader's comments or teachings as incorrect then they are on a very slippery slope of what else was incorrect? It is a tough situation because I believe that some actions and teaching of the past were blatently FALSE and I believe privately leaders of today would completely agree. But they are very careful not to criticize past leaders no matter the comments/actions.
It is the same reason that Harvard recruits people of different ethnic, religious, political and geographical backgrounds -- so they can learn about each other, and be better prepared to prosper in life.
Being a minority is difficult, but WE CAN CHOOSE to be defined by how WE treat others as opposed to how others treat US. I believe this is the essence of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Yes, there are people who disparage others because of the color of their skin or because they pronounce words differently or even because of their religion. Disciples of Christ are to stand for truth and righteousness in all things and in all places. May we all be given the strength and courage to do so.
This is where the Church differs from the experience of the United States - the Church also changed it's race related practices (albeit very late in the game) but has not similarly publically refuted those practices and beliefs as being in error.
That is why so many view such changes in practice or policy by the Church as coerced or expedient rather than as sincere corrections in error. And it is why some cannot help but think the Church still believes in earlier teachings because while the practice may have changed nothing has been said addressing the teachings or statements.
It is very similar to the polygamy issue. The change cannot help but appear to have come only from pressure or expediency. No wonder so many still understand polygamy to still be an eternal principal that will later be practiced.
Generalizing is a natural human tendency that must be constantly fought and avoided when dealing with people. The best way I've found to overcome judgmental feelings is to get to know a person and start from ground-zero, putting aside all preconceived notions and learning who that unique individual really is.
Here is your answer:
Some long-dead presidents of the church, like most white men of their day, ignorantly believed that blacks were inferior to whites. Each president was a human who made mistakes.
You might not believe it, but as a faithful LDS, I believe that the president of the church has the keys to administer the priesthood. That doesn't mean he is infallible. It is false doctrine to preach otherwise.
Current church leaders also make mistakes, as do all humans, regardless of their their religion or priesthood callings. Be sure that one of your mistakes is not to murmur against the annointed servants of God. Use your common sense and conscience to decide how best to act as a disciple of Christ.
Be thankful that some of the mistakes of the past have been corrected. Have leaders of the church called past racism a mistake? Yes. They might not ever address the issue in the fashion you desire. Big deal. By your fruits you shall know them.
It was two private higher education institutions (BYU & SJC) that triggered me to learn more and work with those, who shared the same views. I choose to work with those, who are opposite in views, both in the church & out-of-the church. Yet, I know both will bend over backwards to help me if I need the help. I know because they have helped and will continue to help.
The real changes need to occur in the courts sentencing of blacks & other minorities.
It is so thrilling to me that the next US president may be black, one who�s even attended a Moslem school! Wow! Go Obama! I am convinced he can do something to make this world a safer place, cleaning up after the damage Bush has managed to do in his so called "fight against terrorism"! I so hope Obama wins - the world doesn�t need another dense conservative American president! But is Utah ready for a black president?? Doubt it...
Notice that the hatred in these comments aren't from Blacks...they don't hate the same way an anti Mormon or bigot hates...most are glad when the government or a group moves forward. It's the past that haunts...but the future brings hope. I can't even remember that last time a black called me a "used to be" racist!
Mormons were largely not slave-owning Southerners, but Northerners. Converts came from anti-slavery Britain and Scandinavia. Mormons never had racially segregated congregations. There were blacks in my ward in Salt Lake in the 1950s. Contrast Southern Baptists, whose church was created to defend slavery, and who still have some segregated congregations.
Plenty of white Mormons are donating 2 years as missionaries in African nations. How can you call them racist?
In my little Idaho ward, we have families with mixed race marriages and adopted black children and an elder from Kenya. They were all accepted as ward members.
Some people may be concerned about how you, as a minority person, look at THEM. American society says all blacks have anger and all whites are guilty. They just need reassurance.
Please do not confuse the issue of Racism with the Anti Mormon Crowd. Facts seems to get in the way.
I find it interesting that some dough heads call the LDS Church Racist when they
A) allowed Blacks to own land in Utah (1850-1900) where no one else allowed it. The LDS store owners also sold supplies to them (unlike the South). They ate together and worshiped together
B) no segreation of Wards for the blacks
C) open missionary work with those other "Races" (Inidans, Polynesains, south Americans, Mexicans, etc)
D) When there is a disaster in Africa or Some other country the LDS church is one of the first one there handing out needed supplies REGUARDLESS of Race.
E) Brigham Young worked with the Local Indians Tribes (Utes mostly) to use the land, we gave them cattle, food stuff, etc. Yes, we had idiots on both sides.
Granted we did not have a lot of Black converts at the time, but when other of "Race" came we took care of them.
So I guess we are not as Racist as they think we are.
They could get suspended for such acts.
The position of the Church regarding the Negro may be understood when another doctrine of the Church is kept in mind, namely, that the conduct of spirits in the premortal existence has some determining effect upon the conditions and circumstances under which these spirits take on mortality and that while the details of this principle have not been made known, the mortality is a privilege that is given to those who maintain their first estate; and that the worth of the privilege is so great that spirits are willing to come to earth and take on bodies no matter what the handicap may be as to the kind of bodies they are to secure; and that among the handicaps, failure of the right to enjoy in mortality the blessings of the priesthood is a handicap which spirits are willing to assume in order that they might come to earth. Under this principle there is no injustice whatsoever involved in this deprivation as to the holding of the priesthood by the Negroes.
The First Presidency
ref. (Neither White nor Black:
Signature Books; Midvale, Utah
� 1984 by Signature Books.)
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- NHL roundup 2:05 a.m.
- 1A high school football: All-State teams 1:49 a.m.
- 2A high school football: All-State 1:40 a.m.
- 3A high school football: All-State 1:30 a.m.
- 4A high school football: All-State 12:48 a.m.
- 5A high school football All-State 12:25 a.m.
- Woods soap opera takes more turns 12:24 a.m.
- Defense lifts Jets to win over Buffalo 12:23 a.m.
- Ex-USU, NFL great to be honored 12:23 a.m.
- Jazz: Miles, Kirilenko to play Friday 12:14 a.m.
- Hate not limited to 1 in-state rivalry
- Mr. Football 2009: Tuni Kanuch
- Aggies shoot past Cougars
- Mitchell said to share LeBaron traits
- Phoenix signs off on LDS temple
- BYU prof a 'Top Global Thinker'
- Toddler dies trapped under mattress
- Harpring's NBA career is over
- Aggie 'D' holds BYU to season low
- Crews to seal Nutty Putty Cave
- Hall reprimanded by MWC
406 - Max Hall issues apology
393 - Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal
361 - Why is Y. ignoring spew of hatred?
287 - Utes won't respond to Hall
278 - BYU says Hall incident resolved
247 - Letters: Liberal because LDS
216 - 2 citations issued at Y.-U. game
188 - Aggies shoot past Cougars
175 - Hate not limited to 1 in-state rivalry
158
If you want to learn what it's like to be an astronaut on the...
First, a big thank you to all who posted questions here for me to ask...
The more people there are helping the less supervised the children present...
Thanks for the passion and intensity you brought to the court day-in and...
Sloan, comeon, we're talking about the same guy that gave jarron collins...
Those Jazz teams in the early eighties must have had a horrible record in...
I love this story! I was terrified as snakes as a child. Mainly, because I...
I have to admit. I am glad it died. The article makes light of the fact that...
are guilty of hate themselves.
I still have my green Jazz jacket that I will wear to the game when the Jazz...
just wait a day
@cl, I'm with you, it would be nice to see feztheb and miles play up to...





I see your point. However I think you need to remember many black students at BYU come from majority black areas.
They have never been around so many white people before. There are different levels of adjustment for different people. I think this article captures both the need to stand up and the need to be understanding.
I know I too often go to anger. When I hear a fello ward member make the comment "I don't feel safe with all these black people around" I can not help going on a shouting rampage of how I am tired of being surrounded by a bunch of evil racists.
I know that calm, balenced analysis is better. I know that shouting at people is not the answer. But such a statement just raises my blood level to that of anger. The really scarry thing to me is that was a statement made by someone born after 1985. I once thought once my grandmother's generation died out we would be free of racism, but I sometimes almost think things are getting worse.