Reader comments
Academic world training an eye on Mormonism
95 comments | Read story
I'd like to know, though, if they're considering Mormonism as a religion, sect, denomination, creed, cult, faith, or myth, etc.
But whichever, with Harvard's esteemed and honorable stature in the world educational community, the best I can say is, "WE'VE ARRIVED!"
Even true blue believing members hide their heads in the sand at any notion of conflict with the standardized version history/doctrine that comes out of Salt Lake now.
The Church may be a fine culture for some to live and raise their families (I don't think such), but this could be the beginning of something pretty difficult for LDS inc.
Unfortunately, the intellectual establishment believes they are too smart (or prideful) to rely on the spirit (which will teach you all things as spoken by Christ) or feel a need for faith which requires humility. They tend to rely solely on their above-average intellect and try to persuade others that they know better than us. There is a reason why it says in the scriptures not to 'rely on the arm of the flesh'.
I hope there will be some memorial to Brigham H Roberts in the naming, perhaps, of these new endowed chairs. I hope, too, that states where the history of the church is rooted - Vermont, New York, Ohio, Missouri, Illinois - will not let too many years go by before their great universities get on the Mormon studies bandwagon.
"And in the days of these kings, the God of Heaven shall set up a kingdom..."
Who knows? It could open the way for good to come to pass and more knowledge of LDS' to bridge the gap of communication and stop the bigotry so prevalent in the media and the religious right. If those not afraid of the truth search it out, they will dissect it and find it. I know. a mc, AF, UT
Hmmm.
What about the rather inconvenient fact that people are leaving in droves?
Kind of funny, actually. Lots of little bumps in the road on this one, though. I am presently reading a book called The Chaos of Cults, 8th edition, 1949, by Jan karel Van Baalen, and there it is: "Mormonism", pp. 134-163. Just bought the book at a library book sale. This will keep me occupied for an hour or two this afternoon while I enjoy the spring sunshine.
After the Mormonism chapter, in case you don't have your own copy of this well recognized and accepted standard, is the chapter on Seventh-Day Adventism. Their history might keep me in thoughts for the whole weekend.
Don't get too excited about what you wish for. The world might come back to thinking of Mormonism as a cult. Probably because it fits the definition and not the politically correctness that seems to be about in our open society.
The shadow knows.
Talk behind your back and tell false lies about people they don't know
They do this in the Home School meetings
Their kids are un ruley and not taught any manners
That's Mormonism
"Just be prepared," there is as much "supporting evidence" for Mormonism as there is for any religion. Find the archeological remains of any religious sites, of Moses, Jesus, etc.. Troy, the site of one of one of the most read novels in the world for more than 2,000 years was only "discovered" within the last 150 years or so.
"Just be prepared | 9:46 a.m. Feb. 23, 2008,"," I think Pres. Eyring's father would disagree with you that there is a conflict between intellect and spirit. After all, Brigham Young studied Mormonism for two years before he joined -- don't you think his honest intellectual study had some benefit? As, "Timely--Good Public Relations | 10:42 a.m. Feb. 23, 2008 " put it, intellectual honesty in these classes will require studying the texts.
"Shadow," quoting a book from 1949 as the "standard?" Really? LOL!
Now we�re really going to seem peculiar.
"Some things that are true are not very useful."
Welcome aboard brothers and sisters. We have ARRIVED!
It is truly inspiring of the acceptance of our faith on this level.
The only people I EVER hear this from are LDS critics, attempting to somehow shove words in the mouth of the LDS Church.
I find it interesting how critics argue their case against Mormonism. They put Latter-day Saints in a box, telling them what they believe, how they act and think. (just read a few of the previous comments) Then when the Latter-day Saints attempt to explain where the critic is incorrect, the critic responds with one of the following.
"I know more about the LDS Church than you ever will."
"Just admit that I'm right and you're wrong."
"You're just a brainwashed member of an evil cult corporation."
Even before the LDS Church was organized in 1830, critics have consistently attempted to attack it, undermine it, denounce it and expose it. And the results so far? Thousands of LDS wards, branches and stakes in over 150 countries and territories, 120+ temples completed or under construction worldwide, and an average one LDS chapel completed every single day.
Calm down. Just ignore their comments. They are all jealous of us because we are growing so fast.
Like a stone cut out of a mountain, we will fill the earth.
Good or bad it will spark an interest in the Church and give members an opportunity to answer questions and share their testimonies.
Go State!
Truth? | 1:46 p.m. pointed out an example of where the LDS Church has allegedly hidden its history. The problem of course is that many LDS writers and scholars have written about the Book of Abraham, and Book of Mormon DNA, archeology, polygamy and anything else you can name. So how is the LDS Church hiding these issues?
Of course, the critics have an easy out. Just personally attack any LDS leader, scholar or writer who tries to explain LDS history and doctrine and the case is one. Just make blanket attacks against the LDS Historical Department, BYU, FARMS and FAIR and the critics win.
And if you want proof of this (and we all know critics love to seek for proof) just read the comments of people like "dennyG | 8:21 a.m." and "Sad to say | 12:15 p.m."
You never know, you can be an influence for good to spread the word of truth.--
P.S.
An observation:
I see how the personal attitude of the writer comes through and tells more about you than what you write about, the negative comments are what I refer... The positive comments are very supportive, on the other hand the negative are the opposition.
Timeley, Good Public Relations. Y
I stand corrected by myself instead. No criticism necessary. I repented and have been forgiven! ;)
Set the facts straight I was premature, and maybe hopeful for the Mormon Studies to be right here in Happy Valley. We can always support it and keep working on it coming to fruition. M-studies deserves to be a part of the religion education. Notice I said religion, not religious? Thanks...
Timely, Good P. R.
Only fundies rely on reverse cultists like Ed Decker. You don't have to tell lies or follow people with their own religious agenda to find out the truth. Just google "book of abraham translation" or "first vision versions" or polygamy and read what you'll find. And by all means, go to FARMS or lds.org and read the faith-promoting view and see if it holds up. You may find that it does, but you may be surprised by what you learn.
If it's true, it will look better after you do your research. If it's true, you have nothing to fear from looking at both sides.
Next UNLV will have a course on how gambling can make you rich.
Long ago in mother russia I asked some college age russkies why they still had to study Karl Marx and the whole package. Didn't they already know all of the answers? What was the point? Couldn't they read it all again, at home... or at the factory?
They said in unison: you never know when you are going to need it... to keep your job.
The shadow knows.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- SUU museum to honor local artists 10:17 p.m.
- McCoy keeps hauling in awards 10:16 p.m.
- Utah part of environmental settlement 10:15 p.m.
- Saints cost man 60-inch TV 10:14 p.m.
- Pistons spoil Billups' trip to Detroit 10:13 p.m.
- Utah Co. freeway should last 40 years 10:12 p.m.
- Depleted uranium OK'd for storage 10:12 p.m.
- We're not Lion, here's the Cup 10:08 p.m.
- MLB notes 10:07 p.m.
- Santa planning 2 visits to Alpine 10:06 p.m.
- Nude bathers cited for lewdness
- Few details on missing W.V. mom
- Jazz fall apart late at L.A.
- Crash landing next to I-15
- Defense witness goes on offensive
- BCS = power conference monopoly
- Palin signs books, chats with fans
- I-15 expansion barreling south
- 5 officers lose their certification
- Y.'s Emery bruised, but rarely beaten
- Letters: Global warming a lie
256 - TCU to play Boise in Fiesta Bowl
206 - BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall
193 - Palin signs books, chats with fans
163 - Cougars going back to Vegas
150 - Utah/BYU rivalry can be more civil
149 - Andersen apologizes for Jordan hoax
142 - Max Hall wants to look ahead
124 - Nude bathers cited for lewdness
119 - Jazz fall apart late at L.A.
110
Love him or hate him, Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch knows how to get attention.
Well, I did it. I gave in to the seductions of the ridiculously sexy...
The key word here is tax incentives......libertarians and conservatives are...
The Temple is not considered a landmark in San Diego! Maybe if your LDS but...
I think anyone would lose there Job for having sex on the clock. And those...
Writting a song celebrating Hanukkah in no way removes Christ from...
Wealthiest generation in the history of the world. Even Americans living in...
To Trevor | 1:48 p.m. Protests and boycotts CAN be bullying. Especially...
Do it, BYU isn't going anywhere
Well we won't get SS on our home floor, but we do next week in Kanab. Too bad...
To Jayeg, I would have no problem if a Muslim mosque was built on the...
The study has the same validity as the survey of skydivers who have just...



Go Crimson!