Reader comments
Cottonwood works toward police force

7 comments   |   Read story

Outrage | 8:56 a.m. Feb. 12, 2008
The residents of Cottonwood Heights should be outraged that this process isn't more open and fair. The city should be advertising the chief's position and conducting interviews. Just appointing someone seems unjust. But then again, if people are connecting the dots, this is just one more step in the mayor's kingdom building process.
Not from Cottonwood | 11:10 a.m. Feb. 12, 2008
Why would anyone be surprised that the Cottonwood mayor and council are going to "appoint" a chief instead of opening the job to any qualified LEO. They did exactly what they wanted in breaking away from the Sheriff's Office despite their citizens' disapproval. Appointing a chief, whether it is Lt. Russo or not, is all part of the kingdom building. I hope the citizens of Cottonwood remember this come election time. The elected officials don't care about their constituents, they care about their own power building.
Cody, | 1:41 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
Most the calls the city got, prior to the vote, Were in favor of the change. Except those directly associated with Sherriffs office.
Comments continue below
Clueless | 2:16 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
Over 80% of the citizen comments were in support of forming their own police department. Get your facts straight before you accuse and demean.
CH Citizen | 2:46 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
When I called to express my opinion I was told by the city staff that the majority wanted to keep the sheriff's office. In talking to my neighbors and to people at my daughters school I came to the same assessment, Most people in CH wanted to keep the sheriff's office and most called to record their support. I can only presume that Clueless is one of the mayors cronnies and is claiming incorrect information.
Not true | 3:31 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
Most of the residents were in favor of staying with the sheriff's office. And to set the record straight, most were NOT affliated with the sheriff's office.
Bill | 7:16 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
I was at several city meeting discussing the police service. I take exception to the statement, everyone opposed to this was from the Sheriff's Office. I spoke againts the city polce concept and am not in anyway affliated to the Sheriff's Office. As I remember, only two Sheriff Deputies spoke, a man and a woman. And the male deputy gave some of the most compelling reasons to stay with the Sheriff's Office and he lived in the city. I did not get to vote for this change but I will be voting in the next election.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

Dixie will beat Springville. Mark my words. The northern fans once again...

No depth at quarterback for BYU? Your post shows just how out of touch...

Don't matter none, Bennett will win since has the LDS backing. If ya'll want...

3A football: Wasatch outslugs Bears

That makes sense. So your offense caused PC to put that many points on the...

Poor PG fans can't handle the truth, now that they are done. Thanks for...

You might learn how to read before commenting on things. I provided a simple...

that an appeal is finally in favor of the player. We had an incident happen...

i hear that the number 8 kid is the best on the team

12 high schools ready for 'The Turf'

If you like those stadiums, move to Texas. And don't try to minimize the...

Semper Fi: now we have a Marine in charge, now we can get something done.

Advertisements
Advertisement