Reader comments
Cottonwood works toward police force

7 comments   |   Read story

Outrage | 8:56 a.m. Feb. 12, 2008
The residents of Cottonwood Heights should be outraged that this process isn't more open and fair. The city should be advertising the chief's position and conducting interviews. Just appointing someone seems unjust. But then again, if people are connecting the dots, this is just one more step in the mayor's kingdom building process.
Not from Cottonwood | 11:10 a.m. Feb. 12, 2008
Why would anyone be surprised that the Cottonwood mayor and council are going to "appoint" a chief instead of opening the job to any qualified LEO. They did exactly what they wanted in breaking away from the Sheriff's Office despite their citizens' disapproval. Appointing a chief, whether it is Lt. Russo or not, is all part of the kingdom building. I hope the citizens of Cottonwood remember this come election time. The elected officials don't care about their constituents, they care about their own power building.
Cody, | 1:41 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
Most the calls the city got, prior to the vote, Were in favor of the change. Except those directly associated with Sherriffs office.
Comments continue below
Clueless | 2:16 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
Over 80% of the citizen comments were in support of forming their own police department. Get your facts straight before you accuse and demean.
CH Citizen | 2:46 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
When I called to express my opinion I was told by the city staff that the majority wanted to keep the sheriff's office. In talking to my neighbors and to people at my daughters school I came to the same assessment, Most people in CH wanted to keep the sheriff's office and most called to record their support. I can only presume that Clueless is one of the mayors cronnies and is claiming incorrect information.
Not true | 3:31 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
Most of the residents were in favor of staying with the sheriff's office. And to set the record straight, most were NOT affliated with the sheriff's office.
Bill | 7:16 p.m. Feb. 12, 2008
I was at several city meeting discussing the police service. I take exception to the statement, everyone opposed to this was from the Sheriff's Office. I spoke againts the city polce concept and am not in anyway affliated to the Sheriff's Office. As I remember, only two Sheriff Deputies spoke, a man and a woman. And the male deputy gave some of the most compelling reasons to stay with the Sheriff's Office and he lived in the city. I did not get to vote for this change but I will be voting in the next election.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

Sorry to read about the death of John Jones and condolences to his family and...

Thank you for this fantastic article. Way to go to the Highland Football...

sign him up Jazz,he won`t be there long,I bet someone signs him within a...

Letters: Why sex-ed debate?

My sons have no problem talking to me about sex. I remember when my stepson...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

I think the change we need is moving Williams to the 2 spot and find a pass...

Healthcare Change values Families Outrageous Healthcare bills are the #1...

Just remember where your little buddy is, who is sitting in JAIL, ask him how...

Great man, great honor. BYU and Utah both have great coahces now...makes up...

Boys basketball rankings

Rich won't be playing for a state title! They were picked to be in there...

Re: Jim And if the rainforests are wiped out, what becomes of this oxygen...

Advertisements