Reader comments
Romney wins Utah, Mass., but suffers series of Super Tuesday losses
173 comments | Read story
Mob rule | 1:22 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
It's too bad mob rule exists not only in religion but also in politics. The
Huckster gets to glote in his buddying-up with his insider friends and serve as
the spoiler in the election. What chance does one man stand against the bullies?
Let's have a one on one contest and see how Mitt does. Level the playing
field.
Joe | 2:04 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
McCaine is a disgrace to the Republican Party. He is weak on the economy and he
wants to keep the troops in Iraq... Enough is Enough. McCaine is not worthy of
the nomimation. Vote Romney. He is the change we need.
Comments continue below
Romney is a fake and liar | 2:12 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Mob rule, I don't want a one on one contest because that isn't how
real democracy works. Huckabee has a strong chance of winning and the people who
support him should have the right to vote for him instead of being forced to
vote for what they consider the lesser of two evils. I'm fairly certain
that those who intend to vote for Huckabee don't want to vote for Mitt
Romney or John McCain. If your suggestion was correct they would be basically
forced out of the race for the White House.
I'm a Democrat so I don't really care who wins the Republican nomination but I believe that Republican voters deserve the right to a say in the nomineee instead of being forced to say "I want neither but I choose Romney" or "McCain."
Furthermore, Romney's comments were rude, arrogant and repugnant. I would have hoped that his being Mormon would make him a good person but that's been demonstrated to be false. I'm just glad that he isn't a member of my Ward so I don't have to see him lie in Church on Sunday and show how horrible he is on Tuesday.
I'm a Democrat so I don't really care who wins the Republican nomination but I believe that Republican voters deserve the right to a say in the nomineee instead of being forced to say "I want neither but I choose Romney" or "McCain."
Furthermore, Romney's comments were rude, arrogant and repugnant. I would have hoped that his being Mormon would make him a good person but that's been demonstrated to be false. I'm just glad that he isn't a member of my Ward so I don't have to see him lie in Church on Sunday and show how horrible he is on Tuesday.
REP | 4:14 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
I think that so many LDS members are voting for Mitt, solely because of his
same faith, simular to blacks voting for Obama, that they fail to see the fact
that if Mitt wins the repub. nomination, the dems', in the haste to win the
whitehouse will certainly "swift boat" the mormon faith. I predict
that they will drive home the word "cult" in the minds of every
american. So far it's been a non issue but he has yet to run against a Dem.
party that allready believes the whitehouse is thier's!
Be careful what you wish for.
Art | 5:28 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
I received a push-poll call yesterday asking me three questions about Romney
that were negative mis-statements of Romney's actions. I politely
explained to the caller what the errors were. There was no mention of McCain,
but it was clear for the purpose of supporting McCain. It is sad that a war hero
can decide to get on the side of evil in order to win at the expense of the
country he suffered and nearly died for.
Too Late? | 5:45 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
I think some voters across the nation are starting to see Romney's lure and
also see what McCain is really all about. I wish Hannity, Ingraham and Levine
would have come out for Romney several weeks ago, instead of just last week, it
seems to be working. I just hope it's not too late. Go Mitt
It IS about religion | 5:44 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Unfortunately the election IS coming down to religion. The only reason the
bigot Huckabee is still in the race is because as a Baptist preacher, he hates
the LDS church because they attempt to sway his people away from him, which
takes money out of his pocket. This is his way to fight back a little. The
'Christians' are so short-sighted. What they are going to do is hand
the white house to an extreme liberal - take your pick - either Hillay or Obama.
Either way this contest was about religion at its core. America will get the
leadership it deserves -- I just hope that Mitt (or someone like him who is
capable, honest and full of integrity) can show up in 2012 and NOT be BIGOTed to
death.
Trea | 6:15 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
A heart felt wish of success in the California and Connecticut primaries. I
believe in Nitt's honesty, leadership abilities & most of his concepts
on the economic and world wide political stage. I hope most Republicans will see
through the retoric of the primary contests and look to the strength,
determination & ability to work with congress to create solutions to current
national, economic and international problems as well as any future concerns in
the coming 4-8 years.
Sharon | 6:09 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Romney is depending on his money to win the race. Why should money win an
election? It is not right that just because he has more money, he should be the
one we choose as our candidate. The economy is only one of the many issues, and
as far as Mr. McCain, who whould be naive enough to think that he would not have
advisors to guide him in these hard economic times. Also, he has had experience
in the Senate with economic issues. Why would anyone think that he would not be
able to give credit to businessmen? Mr. McCain also has the expereince we need
to deal with leaders from other countries. He knows the issues we face with
other countries. As far as being a warmonger, we need someone like Mr. McCain to
not let the efforts of those that have died in this war be lost. Maybe Mr.
McCain is the person we need to bring the democrats and the republicans together
to make this nation prosper economically as well as internationally. This is not
an "on the job training" position. We need someone with experience who
will be ready to start on day one!
Tom in CA | 6:17 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
I'm not fooled. McCain contends Romney set the "negative" tone in
order to justify his own(McCain's) smear tactics. Romney illustrates clear
differences v. McCain tells premeditated outright lies. McCain is a liar not to
be trusted as a leader. As a US Senator in a border state no less, he has had 25
years to fix the illegal alien problem and not done it - so why believe he will
do it now. I am on my way to vote for Romney today. Don't give up Mitt
Romney - you are the greatest.
liberal larry | 6:21 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
I've been waiting for McCain to emerge from this flawed, anemic Republican
field. Romney could have been an appealing candidate, but he sowed the seeds of
his own destruction by pandering to the liberals in his race for governor. Now
his swing to the right seems so disingenuous as to be laughable, It's
almost time to regroup and get ready for 2012 for the conservatives.
Wake up conservatives!!! | 7:19 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
While it might be a long shot, here�s to hoping that
conservatives will be able to see John McCain for the liberal that he is and get
it right by voting for Mitt Romney. For the
�conservatives� who might be
experiencing a mental block, here�s a quick run down of
McAmnesty:
McCain-Kennedy: Also referred to as Amnesty for Illegal Aliens, The Sellout of America or Leave No Illegal Alien Behind Bill.
McCain-Feingold: This is perhaps one of the more left-wing acts of Congress in the past twenty years. This is an attempt to silence conservatives and poses blatant restrictions on political speech.
McCain-Lieberman: A gun control bill that places restrictions on the 2nd Amendment.
In 2005 McCain opposed a federal gay-marriage ban (Los Angeles Times, 1/25/ and 3/8).
Senate minority leader Tom Daschle (Democrat) admitted that he was approached by McCain�s �people� and that he and McCain engaged in serious conversations about McCain joining the Democratic Party in 2001.
On the economy, McCain is the epitome of incompetence! He makes Miss Teen South Carolina look intelligent. He actually said that cutting interest rates to 0 is a good thing. Talk about clueless!
McCain is a liberal! Regards, Hillary
McCain-Kennedy: Also referred to as Amnesty for Illegal Aliens, The Sellout of America or Leave No Illegal Alien Behind Bill.
McCain-Feingold: This is perhaps one of the more left-wing acts of Congress in the past twenty years. This is an attempt to silence conservatives and poses blatant restrictions on political speech.
McCain-Lieberman: A gun control bill that places restrictions on the 2nd Amendment.
In 2005 McCain opposed a federal gay-marriage ban (Los Angeles Times, 1/25/ and 3/8).
Senate minority leader Tom Daschle (Democrat) admitted that he was approached by McCain�s �people� and that he and McCain engaged in serious conversations about McCain joining the Democratic Party in 2001.
On the economy, McCain is the epitome of incompetence! He makes Miss Teen South Carolina look intelligent. He actually said that cutting interest rates to 0 is a good thing. Talk about clueless!
McCain is a liberal! Regards, Hillary
Jazz Fan | 7:14 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
You say Romney is trying to portray McCain as too close to the democrats?
Dear John does quite a good job of that himself climbing aboard a jackass with other liberals while tells the republican elephant it's going to get thrown a bag of peanuts every now and then if it changes it's conservative ways.
If McCain is a conservative then I'm a Laker fan eating cake.
Dear John does quite a good job of that himself climbing aboard a jackass with other liberals while tells the republican elephant it's going to get thrown a bag of peanuts every now and then if it changes it's conservative ways.
If McCain is a conservative then I'm a Laker fan eating cake.
Re: brad | 7:32 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Romney is not exactly anti-war. If you want a president that will end the war
you better vote democrat, not republican. Still, Romney is still a far better
option than McCain.
A Mobster | 7:30 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Mob rule...sounds like democracy at work.
Caroline | 7:36 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
I am for Gov. Romney. I believe he is the right choice and will bring prosperity
in this land of ours. His great personal success in business and family is great
proof of his talent and wonderful dedication to what he endeavours to do. He has
the winning attitude amidst the bullies, the grace under pressure that I truly
marvel and respect. He has the virtues and the blessings to continue to serve
our country and fellowmen. I always have him in my prayer. I already voted for
him here in California. He is going to win this election because he had preapred
for this all his life, he has the best organization, surrounded by best people,
voted by the finest, endorsed by the majority. Long live Gov. Romney!!!!
Truth Emerges | 8:00 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
This electorate process has done exactly what it is supposed to do. To weed out
the bad from the good, to separate the wheat from the tares.
That is why we see McCain emerging as the Republican nominee. America has seen what Romney is about, and the majority don't like him.
That is why we see McCain emerging as the Republican nominee. America has seen what Romney is about, and the majority don't like him.
Alex | 8:02 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Good luck to Obama in today's race!
arc | 8:09 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
The last big contest, with 18 delegates was Maine. Romney won with over 50% of
the votes. The news is out there, but most of the media is not covering it. They
don't want to mess up the chance people will vote for McCain. Many in the
republican party will NOT vote for McCain. Romney is the best option.
Jay | 8:14 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Truth Emerges, I agree. People aren't voting against Romney because of his
faith, but because he's a weasel.
Kathy B | 8:15 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
When Bush and Gore were debating, I noticed that when Gore spoke, Bush stood
and turned toward him and listened. However, when Bush spoke, Gore only wrote
notes and looked at the audience.
When I last saw Romney and McCain, I saw the same behavior. When McCain spoke, Romney turned in his chair to comfortably face and listen. When Romney spoke, McCain kept his head down doing his notes, as Gore had.
What does this mean? A statesman has to always be respectful of the speaker, whether it be a senator or King.
Romney showed me that, McCain did not. When the final Dem and Rep debate later this year, I will be watching to see if my "rule" will predict for a third time!
When I last saw Romney and McCain, I saw the same behavior. When McCain spoke, Romney turned in his chair to comfortably face and listen. When Romney spoke, McCain kept his head down doing his notes, as Gore had.
What does this mean? A statesman has to always be respectful of the speaker, whether it be a senator or King.
Romney showed me that, McCain did not. When the final Dem and Rep debate later this year, I will be watching to see if my "rule" will predict for a third time!
Prediction | 8:36 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
It will take four years with a Democrat in the Oval Office before this country
will even consider electing Mitt Romney. McCain will get this nomination and
lose in a landslide. The Democrats will make a big mess and Romney will be there
in 2012 to pick up the pieces. I hope!
ROMNEY IN 2012!
ROMNEY IN 2012!
Russ in AZ | 8:37 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
I am not looking for the perfect candidate. He/She does not exist. I CANNOT
vote for McCain! I trust Romney, warts and all. If it comes down to Clinton v
McCain, just shoot me because I lose big either way. McCain cannot beat
Clinton. They are too much alike.
Re: Truth Emerges | 8:39 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Oh yeah, separating the wheat from the tares huh? So far America hasn't
done a great job and supporting those I would call "honest".
Let's take a look back to the Clinton administration where Pres. Clinton
flat out LIED to the country and yet they still supported him. He made a
mockery of our country by his words and actions and yet people still stood by
him. McCain is just as big of a liar, maybe that is why you think the
"majority" like him, because America has been so desensitized to good
morals and values and beliefs, and why shouldn't they be, when our former
President can get away with such reprehensible behavior.
PLEASE Look Yourself! | 8:45 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
McCain intentionally misled American voters right before the Florida primary by
saying Romney wanted a firm "get out of Iraq" date because Romney said
we needed "timelines" and "benchmarks".
Dirty secret #1: The U.S. military already has a timeline and benchmarks in place.
Dirty secret #2: McCain said the same thing early in 2007 (search the Arizona Star newspaper). He said our benchmarks would have to be specific and then said "If the Iraqi government hasn't met the benchmarks then obviously we can't complete the mission and we'll have to re-evaluate our position".
Dirty secret #3: McCain didn't tell America that in the same Romney interview that McCain was harping about, Romney was also asked that if he were President would he (Romney) veto a bill containing an absolute "get out of Iraq" date and ROMNEY SAID YES!!!
Dirty secret #4: McCain intentionally misrepresented Romney in the recent CA GOP debate (watch it on u-Tube) on Romney's MA health-care plan, his increased state fees and on the MA economy. All 3 easily refuted by Romney and NOBODY is saying Romney's answers were incorrect.
Quite frankly, America, McCain's too dishonest and angry to be a decent leader. Vote smart! Go Mitt!
Dirty secret #1: The U.S. military already has a timeline and benchmarks in place.
Dirty secret #2: McCain said the same thing early in 2007 (search the Arizona Star newspaper). He said our benchmarks would have to be specific and then said "If the Iraqi government hasn't met the benchmarks then obviously we can't complete the mission and we'll have to re-evaluate our position".
Dirty secret #3: McCain didn't tell America that in the same Romney interview that McCain was harping about, Romney was also asked that if he were President would he (Romney) veto a bill containing an absolute "get out of Iraq" date and ROMNEY SAID YES!!!
Dirty secret #4: McCain intentionally misrepresented Romney in the recent CA GOP debate (watch it on u-Tube) on Romney's MA health-care plan, his increased state fees and on the MA economy. All 3 easily refuted by Romney and NOBODY is saying Romney's answers were incorrect.
Quite frankly, America, McCain's too dishonest and angry to be a decent leader. Vote smart! Go Mitt!
Alex | 8:42 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Kathy B - I don't know what Vice President Gore was taking notes on. For
all we know, he was sketching, but it's quite possible that he was taking
notes on what President Bush was saying (thus being able to reference them
later), and looking at the audience to gauge reactions to what his opponent was
saying. I do not see how that is disrespectful at all.
car sales man | 9:00 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Vote for Brother Mitt the used car sales man.
Here's the McCain Quote | 9:02 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
"Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., one of the most stalwart supporters of the war
in Iraq, said Thursday that he might propose that the Iraqi government meet
certain BENCHMARKS for the United States to continue its engagement.
Fellow senators and independent political scientists said McCain's thinking reflected growing concerns within the Republican Party about the course of the war, and also might mark a turning point for the likely 2008 presidential contender, whose previous unconditional backing of the war may have hurt his prospects. McCain said Thursday that he hadn't yet decided on precise BENCHMARKS. "They'd have to be specific, and they (Iraqi government officials) would have to meet them," he said.
Asked what penalty would be imposed if Iraq failed to meet HIS BENCHMARKS, he said: "I think everybody knows the consequences. Haven't met the BENCHMARKS? Obviously, then, we're not able to complete the mission. Then you have to examine your options."
Yep, folks, that your beloved McCain. Attacking Romney for saying the same thing that he said. Can you say "h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t"? And....by intentionally misrepresenting Romney you can add "liar" on to that as well. It's all in front of you, fellow voters. What will you do now?
Fellow senators and independent political scientists said McCain's thinking reflected growing concerns within the Republican Party about the course of the war, and also might mark a turning point for the likely 2008 presidential contender, whose previous unconditional backing of the war may have hurt his prospects. McCain said Thursday that he hadn't yet decided on precise BENCHMARKS. "They'd have to be specific, and they (Iraqi government officials) would have to meet them," he said.
Asked what penalty would be imposed if Iraq failed to meet HIS BENCHMARKS, he said: "I think everybody knows the consequences. Haven't met the BENCHMARKS? Obviously, then, we're not able to complete the mission. Then you have to examine your options."
Yep, folks, that your beloved McCain. Attacking Romney for saying the same thing that he said. Can you say "h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t"? And....by intentionally misrepresenting Romney you can add "liar" on to that as well. It's all in front of you, fellow voters. What will you do now?
Nellie | 9:03 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Recently the 'other' newspaper ran a column listing basic views of all
the candidates. I found it very interesting to quiz myself by covering the
names and looking strictly at the candidates' views. I wonder if all of
you would still support your chosen candidate if you looked only at the facts
barring the hype, prejudice and bias.
Ted Owens | 9:14 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Say goodnight, Mitt.
Will | 9:20 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
To all these people that are pointing out legit reasons not to vote for McCain
and to vote for Romney, I say, "Way to go!" McCain is LIBERAL! Romney
is truly the best man for the job. He will help with the economy, immigration,
and I think he will have a good administration to deal with foreign policy.
McCain will only mislead and lie his way through like he has done in his
candidacy. I'm not voting for Romney because he shares my faith, I'm
voting for Romney because as far as I've seen, he's the most qualified
to lead the country.
I'll vote for Mitt, | 9:21 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
When he flips or flops back to supporting gay rights.
McCain Supporter | 9:21 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
This is not about religion. It is about experience. Utah seems to be voting for
Romney because of his religion. We need to look at qualifications not religion.
We need to look at the person and make sure that the person is not oly qualified
but ethical. Ethics are so important. Does the person stand up for what they
believe in or go with the wind? What do we actually know about Romney?
californian | 9:15 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Uhhh...hate to break this to you Utahns, but Californians have a proven record
of voting for MODERATE conservatives which is exactly why Schwarzenegger is our
governor. Mitt clearly does not understand this about California.
Californian | 9:17 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Forgot to mention that the LDS population here isn't nearly enough to
"guarantee" anything especialy when one considers that thousands of
Mormons have moved out of the state (especially to Utah) in the last several
years.
Re: McCain Supporter | 9:39 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
You had better believe ethics is important which is exactly why I could NEVER
vote for McCain. Have you watched his immature, completely childish behavior in
any of the debates? Is this really the man you would want to represent our
country? If McCain wins and it comes down to him or Hillary, sadly, I will not
be able to vote because I ETHICALLY can not vote for either one of them.
A guy | 9:51 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
People are mean. Let's try being positive. Look for the good in the
candidates- all of them.
Will | 9:47 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
RE: McCain Supporter
I don't believe that Utah is voting because of Romney because of his religion. I'm going out on a limb to give them more credit than that. If they are, I think they are getting the right vote, but I would hope that they have taken the time to see for themselves that McCain is NOT the most qualified. His experience is all summed up by what "wake up conservatives" said. He is a liberal. I agree with the fact that you cannot ethically vote for McCain. We know that Romney has what it takes to be President. McCain's only strength is the war, and knowing that it will only make things worse to pull the troops out. Troop pulling is a democratic strategy and quite brainless if you ask me. Romney is strong in that sense, too; as well as economy and immigration. Vote Romney because he has what it takes, not just because of his religion.
I don't believe that Utah is voting because of Romney because of his religion. I'm going out on a limb to give them more credit than that. If they are, I think they are getting the right vote, but I would hope that they have taken the time to see for themselves that McCain is NOT the most qualified. His experience is all summed up by what "wake up conservatives" said. He is a liberal. I agree with the fact that you cannot ethically vote for McCain. We know that Romney has what it takes to be President. McCain's only strength is the war, and knowing that it will only make things worse to pull the troops out. Troop pulling is a democratic strategy and quite brainless if you ask me. Romney is strong in that sense, too; as well as economy and immigration. Vote Romney because he has what it takes, not just because of his religion.
McCain and Kerry | 9:56 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Let me give you some straight talk. McCain tried to talk Kerry, into letting
him be the vice-president on the ticket in 04. Kerry didn't choice to take
McCain, not McCain turning down Kerry. Who told us this? John Kerry! I would
have to say that is pretty far to the left. Just because he has painted,
"straight talk," on the side of his bus doesn't give him a pass
from cristism. To bad the National media has a huge man crush on him. McCain
would be a terrible nominee for the party, and I only hope that Obama is the
nominee for the Democrats because I would give him (Obama) my vote! Just
because McCain is a war hero doesn't give him the right to lie, cheat, and
steal this election! Who does he think he is John Kerry, oh wait, he does.
Romney Folks are so ANGRY. | 9:53 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Here are two things that are VERY evident about Romney supporters in Utah:
1. They are hateful. I've seen article after article where they attack everything and everyone that is not Romney. And they generally don't attack based on issues, they PERSONALLY attack. I've always believed that Mormons don't like anyone that is not them...this campaign process has certainly proven that point.
2. Romney's Utah supporters have hyperactive persecution complex. Again, I've seen article after article where reasons are given for disliking Romney without ANY mention of religion. Yet those commenters are attacked and called bigots. I've even seen many many comments that say things like "The Lord's chosen have always been persecuted." Please, spare us.
I really have always thought Mormons were lovable people who lived their lives with compassion. This campaign season has DEFINITELY proved me wrong.
1. They are hateful. I've seen article after article where they attack everything and everyone that is not Romney. And they generally don't attack based on issues, they PERSONALLY attack. I've always believed that Mormons don't like anyone that is not them...this campaign process has certainly proven that point.
2. Romney's Utah supporters have hyperactive persecution complex. Again, I've seen article after article where reasons are given for disliking Romney without ANY mention of religion. Yet those commenters are attacked and called bigots. I've even seen many many comments that say things like "The Lord's chosen have always been persecuted." Please, spare us.
I really have always thought Mormons were lovable people who lived their lives with compassion. This campaign season has DEFINITELY proved me wrong.
Big Bad John | 9:55 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Living as I do in Ireland, I hesitate to become too involved in commenting on
American politics. I find it difficult enough to understand what goes on in my
own small country. However, as you're the only current superpower on the
planet, what happens in the USA is important to all of us. (I can't imagine
our general election last summer would have caused too many ripples in the SLC
Valley.) However, for what it's worth, last year I had a conversation with
a friend of mine who was living in Ireland for a year. He admitted to me that he
was one of the three (or was it four?) registered Democrats in his county in
Utah. However, his view was that the best thing for America would be to elect
Mitt Romney. He also told me that Governor Romney had introduced a universal
one-tier health service in Massachusets. Is this true? Here in this corner of
"liberal" Europe, we have yet to manage that. (I should state that I
believe in a proper universal healthcare system, available to all, regardless of
their means. Whether it's funded by taxation or by insurance is a
discussion for another day.)
Chill out Mormons. | 10:02 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Quick Mormons...Attack McCain as much as possible. Like it matters to a bunch of
sheep in Utah who vote based on only one thing...and you know what that is.
RE: Romney Folks are so ANGRY | 10:06 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Get your story straight. Have you "ALWAYS believed that Mormons don't
like anyone that is not them", or have you "ALWAYS thought Mormons
were lovable people who lived their lives with compassion."?
Mob Rule | 10:06 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Take another look at why Huckelberry is staying in the election. It doesn't
come down to any legit chance of winning. The primary reason for his campaign to
remain is for bigoted, religious intolerant reasons. They might as well get the
tar and feathers ready.
Say What? | 10:10 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
McCain a war hero? He failed to complete his mission and got shot down and
captured. Didn't any of you see the Manchurian Candidate (either version)?
McCain is just wrong, as is Romney. I've watched what a Harvard MBA can
do to destroy an economy with W in the White House. I want change. I'm
supporting Obama.
RE:Romney Folks are so Angry | 10:06 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
My vote has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with qualifications
and ethics. I think your "blanket statement" about Mormons shows your
complete narrow-mindedness and lack of knowledge, and this is coming from a
Non-Mormon. Maybe YOU are the one who needs to stop focusing on religion and
start looking at the actual issues.
Mitt for Pres! | 10:12 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
I believe that if Mitt does not win in 08, he WILL win in 2012. He is a great
man. The fact that people would seriously consider McCain over Romney shows the
general state of our country. SAD. I see Mitt as this country's only
hope. Vote smart. Vote Mitt!!!!!!!!!
RE: Chill out Mormons | 10:14 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
yeah, it is someone who shares similar beliefs and values, isn't that what
the majority of Americans voted based on?
Re to Say What? | 10:18 a.m. Feb. 5, 2008
Look I am a Republican that is looking to support Obama. Why? Because I
don't trust McCain, and he has shown me what type of person he is during
the multiple campaigns he has run. Yet, I is just dumb to think McCain
isn't a hero. He is an american hero for what he went through. Does that
make him deserve to be President? No. Yet, he does deserve respect for what he
did. If Obama doesn't resort to lies and cheating he will get my vote. So
please stop speaking like a Democrat and let me vote for someone that would put
the American interest first over his own. Obama!
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
Related content
- Family thanks effort after cave deat 7:34 p.m.
- Fesenko out with stomach virus 7:31 p.m.
- Cowboys get past Raiders 24-7 7:30 p.m.
- The Who for the Super Bowl 7:08 p.m.
- Thursday's sports transactions 7:06 p.m.
- Holiday festivals offer family fun 6:30 p.m.
- Story of the 'Bells' retold 6:30 p.m.
- Reasons Brooks, Reiner are classics 6:30 p.m.
- Festival of Trees 6:30 p.m.
- Region 7 All-Region Team 6:29 p.m.
- Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies
- Rivalry has had some 'turkeys'
- Cave rescuers committed to free man
- Holiday television program listings
- Highland players make special friend
- Temple Square to use LEDs
- Matt Reynolds vs. Koa Misi
- Missions teach players perseverance
- Salt Lake City woman shot
- Provo star leads Bulldogs to win
- BYU would like friendlier rivalry
261 - Protests against Phoenix LDS temple210
- RSL wins MLS Cup on penalty kicks202
- Bronco, Kyle rubber match139
- BYU records with win133
- Letters: Rushing to judge Palin131
- Thunder rolls by Jazz130
- Boys basketball rankings118
- Editorial: Poor welcome for Palin112
- Hall, Johnson matchup key102
Latest comments
We have known the Jone's family here in Stansbury Park for a number of years...
I heard that the Sophomore Class for WJ was pretty good. I am sure that they...
Makes one appreciate Stockton even the more.
God is our refuge, a very present help in trouble.
re: Define comprehensive About making generalizations. Do you know...
So terrorism is illegal, you tell me is this right morally?, You guys dont...
What an inspiring young women.
The proposal is merely to reform health care insurance. Eighty percent of...
Fast for the Navajo Indians-- the Apaches and the many other Native...
Pres obama is anouncing monday he is sending 37,000 more me over seas
Advertisements
McCain is a warmonger. Why is it that he can't give credit to business people and people that make payroll. They are the ones that have to pay taxes and those taxes go to McCain's paycheck. Which I'm sure he's not willing to give up as Romney did in Mass as gov. and as he's said he'd do as Pres. You don't have to be a soldier to be an American hero. I can't support McCain. If Romney isn't nominated I'll sit out for 4 years until there is a canidate I can support. Romney stick with it you'll take the nomination, all you need is a little more time.
Congrats in advance for the CALI WIN. Romney '08 or nothing.