Reader comments
Setting sights on Super Tuesday
142 comments | Read story
- Page:
- < Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next >
Nancy | 9:44 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
McCain is just nothing but a big phoney and lier. I would hope all who wants to
see Romney take this man down and win we need to put our faith in our higher
power and pray like we have never prayed before that McCain does not win. I
agree that we need to see both Hackabee and Paul leave the race but if not we
just all need to pray that Mitt Romney will win. If not we are in trouble and
like many I will either just write someone in when I vote or vote for the other
party.
Anonymous | 9:40 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Doesn't matter who wins what.
The economic party the U.S. has enjoyed for so long is tanking (for the little guys).
The rest will be building even more vacation homes and buying more yachts.
That's the way our system works.
Live with it.
The economic party the U.S. has enjoyed for so long is tanking (for the little guys).
The rest will be building even more vacation homes and buying more yachts.
That's the way our system works.
Live with it.
Don | 9:51 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
I am the same age as Mitt,about the same time I was guarding airplanes in the
jungles of Thailand and Vietnam,He was in Paris,If Mitt would have joined the
men in uniform he would get most of thier vote?
Comments continue below
Wilson | 10:05 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
I think the fact of the matter is that if Huckabee leaves the party, then
I'm guessing his endorsement will be with McCain giving McCain an advantage
over Romney. Non of the candidates like Romney. He's a threat to each of
their campaigns. It's going to be hard to know how to vote if McCain is
voted as the republican candidate. Obama has some good things to offer, but he
is still a liberal democrat, and supports such things as gay rights/same-sex
marriage and abortion as far as I've heard. I can't say I've
looked into the democratic campaigning all that much. I just know that those are
the types of things that will ruin this country. I am still a conservative
republican. I don't like McCain, but I guess I'm just anxious to see
what happens. Romney stands out as the best leader of the group. Of three major
topics (i.e. Economy, securing the border, and foreign policy) he's very
strong on two. He'll do a great job with the Economy and securing the
border, while things like the war in Iraq are not so much his forte. I think
he'll learn and progress!
Moderate | 10:37 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Sorry folks, but Mitt sounds as insincere as the other talking heads. "I
wish I'd had a chance to serve in the military." Mitt you did have
the chance. All you had to do was enlist. Before this campaign you had my
highest regard but now I think the word "plastic" fits. I'm
really disappointed, this leaves us without a truth speaker - - - Oh wait! We
do have the unelectable Ron Paul. Let's just hand over the election to the
dems and save the money.
John Doe | 10:40 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
After watching the debates the last few weeks and seeing the results thus far,
all I can say is that I am embarrassed to be a Republican. I cannot believe Juan
McCain has any credibility. Let's forget for a moment all the liberal
stances he takes, such as, amnesty for illegals, taking away free speech rights,
opposing the bush tax cuts, no drilling in ANWAR, opposing the death tax,
opposing Guantanamo, and saying that he is opposed to supreme court justices
that wear their conservatism on their sleeves, etc, etc, etc. Let's just
look at last night's debate. McCain is so obviously wrong about
Romney's "timetable" quotes that even Anderson Cooper backed
Romney. BUT McCain just sits there with his stupid smirk denying reality. I
cannot believe anybody that is as liberal as Juan McCain is, that is as big as a
liar and distorts the truth as much as Juan McCain does, is even being
considered for the Republican nominee.
What is the worst thing about all of this, is that Conservatives aren't even going to have representative this fall when the election occurs.
What is the worst thing about all of this, is that Conservatives aren't even going to have representative this fall when the election occurs.
Jason in Atlanta | 10:43 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
What is discouraging for me is the fact that I truly believe that
"overall" America may be too stupid or ignorant to know which
candidate is actually better for them. McCain and Huck have their strategy in
place to deny Romney certain wins by splitting those conservative votes with
Huck. I wish the people who voted for McCain had been "careful for what
they wished for" because I feel that end the end it is only going to get
worse.
Sad for our county | 10:42 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
If it is McCain vs either Hillary or Obama, it is a sad day for our country.
A victory for compromise | 10:59 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
I am so thrilled about Mccain's victory because someone may be elected who
is willing to compromise. The ultra-conservatives and ultra-liberals are the
reason that Washington is broken. Sending someone like Romney who is saying the
same rhetoric from the ultra-conservatives is not going to fix Washington. Just
because he is not been in Washington isn't going to fix the problem--George
Bush was also a Washington outsider, and he has failed miserably in forging
compromise. What we need is to elect a moderate in the middle who can bring the
two extremes closer together, or at least rally the moderates around a common
cause.
And for those of the ultra-conservative mind-set who will vote for Obama to "send a message," realize that doing so will result in all troops coming home, Iraq descending into chaos and a breeding ground for terrorists, and the likelihood of many more terrorist attacks in Europe and the United States, without an adequate military left to combat this. Is that a good result, just because Mccain wants to place a check on pollutants, a check on corrupt political contributions, and a compassionate way of dealing with immigrants who are here illegally?
And for those of the ultra-conservative mind-set who will vote for Obama to "send a message," realize that doing so will result in all troops coming home, Iraq descending into chaos and a breeding ground for terrorists, and the likelihood of many more terrorist attacks in Europe and the United States, without an adequate military left to combat this. Is that a good result, just because Mccain wants to place a check on pollutants, a check on corrupt political contributions, and a compassionate way of dealing with immigrants who are here illegally?
Brent | 11:03 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
If you have been immersed in politics for the last few
years and watched the media comments you should be able to see that the media not the politicians determine the outcomes.
years and watched the media comments you should be able to see that the media not the politicians determine the outcomes.
Get a Grip | 11:06 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
to Mr. Get a Grip:
Once again, a person who thinks he is enlightened opens his mouth and proves otherwise. You are wrong that when you state that I am a social liberal. I am far from that. However, I am a pragmatist. I prefer to think of myself as a truly compassionate conservative. One who will not turn his or her back on those less fortunate. I do not believe in the redistribution of wealth by the government, but I am in favor of our governement doing things that help people lift themselves up and have a better opportunity in life. I think government should follow "true" Christian principles. "Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world." (James 1:27) I don't believe Christ means for us just to "visit", but also to uplift and assist where needed. Government should help with policies that benefit all of its citizens, including the fatherless and widows.
Once again, a person who thinks he is enlightened opens his mouth and proves otherwise. You are wrong that when you state that I am a social liberal. I am far from that. However, I am a pragmatist. I prefer to think of myself as a truly compassionate conservative. One who will not turn his or her back on those less fortunate. I do not believe in the redistribution of wealth by the government, but I am in favor of our governement doing things that help people lift themselves up and have a better opportunity in life. I think government should follow "true" Christian principles. "Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world." (James 1:27) I don't believe Christ means for us just to "visit", but also to uplift and assist where needed. Government should help with policies that benefit all of its citizens, including the fatherless and widows.
dingo | 11:11 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
the problem with moderate republicans is they dont stand for CORE conservative
values. senator mccain sold out the first ammendment to "get along",
he has strongly opposed every meaningful tax cut passed by republicans to
"meet the democrats in the middle", his amnesty bill would have opened
the borders and destroyed any hope of national security we have (the country
rose up against that one and who opposed the country learning the truth? the
democrats). instead of forcing the democrats hands on judicial nominations he
engineered the gang of 14 instead of fighting on principle so he would be
"respected". this is bad policy for the country. give up and dont
fight so we can compromose on CORE conservative values.
that is the fundamental problem with republican moderates they do not take a hard stand on core republican beliefs. they need to be liked and needed to the point of selling out the things that make this country great, the rugged individual spirit, and the drive (the things reagan made alive again after pres carter) to be the best and believe in the individual.
God help the GOP if moderate republicans take control.
that is the fundamental problem with republican moderates they do not take a hard stand on core republican beliefs. they need to be liked and needed to the point of selling out the things that make this country great, the rugged individual spirit, and the drive (the things reagan made alive again after pres carter) to be the best and believe in the individual.
God help the GOP if moderate republicans take control.
Get a Grip | 11:16 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
to: A victory for compromise
As I mentioned earlier I am for Mitt, but I agree with your analysis. A McCain victory is not the end of the world and it would provide an environment for meaningful compromise. Your last question is on the mark. People have become so polarized that they cannot see the mutual benefits of real compromise. Neither side is totally wrong, but each side refuses to even consider that the other may have a point. I too look forward to a moderate voice in Washington. I believe that is what Mitt would be in the long run, but he is currently pandering with the far right to the point that he will hand the nomination to McCain and that may be for the best at this point.
As I mentioned earlier I am for Mitt, but I agree with your analysis. A McCain victory is not the end of the world and it would provide an environment for meaningful compromise. Your last question is on the mark. People have become so polarized that they cannot see the mutual benefits of real compromise. Neither side is totally wrong, but each side refuses to even consider that the other may have a point. I too look forward to a moderate voice in Washington. I believe that is what Mitt would be in the long run, but he is currently pandering with the far right to the point that he will hand the nomination to McCain and that may be for the best at this point.
hoodoo1939 | 11:15 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Romney made his positions clear. McCain is a RINO. He will not be a true
conservative. Romney has the connections to right the economy. He can work with
the military and let them continue to do it right. The economy is the immediate
problem, the military is on the right track. Immigration is the next pending
problem and I like his ideas there, also. He just makes sense for the betterment
of the nation, and has no ties to loyalties to persons already in Washington.
He owes no debts, has accepted no favors. Think about it.
Mc | 11:21 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Brent is right because there are so many voters who only know what they are fed
by the mainstream media. It doesn't matter how good or right a candidate
is if the media won't give him a fair shake. Every story on Mitt Romney is
slanted against him, leaving out crucial info and giving his opponents the last
word. Even the headlines are slanted against him and that's all many
people read, and then they go vote.
Lewt | 11:27 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Some things I noticed: Whenever someone uses the word "anointed" to
refer to a nomination, they didn't like who was picked.
How come no one said they wanted to continue the record of George W. Bush??
Don't you find it a little sad that the worst thing Republicans can call each other is.."liberal"? It used to be a perfectly fine word. I could have thought of worse (and more accurate) names.
How come no one said they wanted to continue the record of George W. Bush??
Don't you find it a little sad that the worst thing Republicans can call each other is.."liberal"? It used to be a perfectly fine word. I could have thought of worse (and more accurate) names.
Get a Grip | 11:30 a.m. Jan. 31, 2008
to: dingo
Your beloved prophet of consevatism Ronald Reagan grew the size of the goverment at an unprecedented rate. You speak of CORE conservative values as if they were invented by Republicans. Throughout history, the Republican party has expressed some of the most progressive thoughts developed in our nation. Only in recent years has it been hijacked by ultra-conservatives who care nothing for the rest of the country. The only difference between Republicans and Democrats today is which polarized view they take. I think it is time for independent free thinking Americans to abandon both parties and take control of the country before you idealogues destroy it in your war of conflicting ideas.
Your beloved prophet of consevatism Ronald Reagan grew the size of the goverment at an unprecedented rate. You speak of CORE conservative values as if they were invented by Republicans. Throughout history, the Republican party has expressed some of the most progressive thoughts developed in our nation. Only in recent years has it been hijacked by ultra-conservatives who care nothing for the rest of the country. The only difference between Republicans and Democrats today is which polarized view they take. I think it is time for independent free thinking Americans to abandon both parties and take control of the country before you idealogues destroy it in your war of conflicting ideas.
anyone but Mitt | 12:06 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
As a Democrat, I truly hope Mitt Romney becomes the GOP nominee, which will all
but guarantee a Democratic victory.
As an American, I hope John McCain is the nominee. We can then have a real debate about the war, healthcare and other real issues.
As an American, I hope John McCain is the nominee. We can then have a real debate about the war, healthcare and other real issues.
core conservative values | 12:11 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
While I respect core conservative values, the problem is that there are also
plenty in Washington that espouse "core liberal values." If both
extremes are unwilling to compromise, then you have an impasse, a deadlock.
That is the state of Washington right now, the reason it is broken. There is no
hope of "fixing" Washington until the two extremes find middle ground,
or compromise.
The gang of 14 is a perfect example of the importance of compromise. Without compromise, Alito doesn't get confirmed, the two parties hate each other to the point of irreparable harm, and there is no hope of any legislation being passed in our lifetime (or a new justice being confirmed). Thank goodness for Mccain and other moderates, who engineered a compromise so that Alito could get confirmed.
If you want to hold fast to your core left or right values and see greater deadlock and impasse and hostility in Washington, then continue to vote for the candidate that represents those values. Also realize that there is a difference between moderates in the middle and liberals on the left. Moderates are attempting to bring the liberals to the middle so that compromise and progress can result.
The gang of 14 is a perfect example of the importance of compromise. Without compromise, Alito doesn't get confirmed, the two parties hate each other to the point of irreparable harm, and there is no hope of any legislation being passed in our lifetime (or a new justice being confirmed). Thank goodness for Mccain and other moderates, who engineered a compromise so that Alito could get confirmed.
If you want to hold fast to your core left or right values and see greater deadlock and impasse and hostility in Washington, then continue to vote for the candidate that represents those values. Also realize that there is a difference between moderates in the middle and liberals on the left. Moderates are attempting to bring the liberals to the middle so that compromise and progress can result.
liberal means the people | 12:14 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
A couple of sources, including the Drudge Report and the Washington Post, are
saying that Barack Obama's campaign will report a January fundraising total
of $32 million, a new record. This total includes contributions from 170,000 new
donors.
Go Obama, Go!
Go Obama, Go!
The Implosion of the GOP | 12:17 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
A few months ago, there was a spate of retirement announcements among House
Republicans, but it wasn�t too big a deal. The
announcements were a little early, but the numbers were in line with normal
turnover that happens in practically every cycle. But what started as a modest
trend is starting to look like an exodus.... In all, there are now 28 House
Republicans who will not seek re-election (about 14% of the House GOP caucus) --
including five retirement announcements in the last five days. One almost gets
the sense that Republican lawmakers a) aren�t fond of being
in the minority; and b) aren�t confident that
�08 will be a GOP year.
Willy | 12:16 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
RE: liberal means free...
What are you trying to say? Liberal means free? Are you honestly trying to say that we should just open the "cage" and let the "extremely dangerous animals" run free? Give me a break, honestly. Liberal means ruining America and what it stands for.
What are you trying to say? Liberal means free? Are you honestly trying to say that we should just open the "cage" and let the "extremely dangerous animals" run free? Give me a break, honestly. Liberal means ruining America and what it stands for.
znsabino | 12:27 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
It is true that a lie is a lie no matter how you say it. McCain will do and say
whatever it takes to get to the office. He knows how much he would benefit
himself and all his "cronnies" from doing so. he is only looking for
himself and those people around him.
AMERICA wake up....Its time to hear our voice. Enough to those politician who have made it as their way of livelihood.
AMERICA deserves much better than him.
Our economy is in danger. Remember his war life can not be maintained without the support from the result of good economy. And obviously, he doesn't get since he has little knowledge about the economy.
AMERICA wake up....Its time to hear our voice. Enough to those politician who have made it as their way of livelihood.
AMERICA deserves much better than him.
Our economy is in danger. Remember his war life can not be maintained without the support from the result of good economy. And obviously, he doesn't get since he has little knowledge about the economy.
ed from florida | 12:52 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
I agree wiith Robert from NC. Sen. McCain's endorsements are not being made
without any strings attached. I would hope that the media and the three
Republicans still standing would press Sen. McCain on this issue and find out
what he is giving up for them. He is definitely moving the Republican party to
the left and come November the Democrats will say that he and whomever he picks
for a running mate are just like us and the CHANGE CHANT will win out. Yes, Sen.
McCain will cost the Republicans the White House and he is destroying any
opposition party to satisfy an egotistical need that has been festering since at
least 2000.
Anonymous | 12:59 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Willy -
There is the original meaning of liberal:
free, belonging to the people, not restricted, generous, not strict, tolerant of views other than one's own, broad-minded, favoring reform or progress.
Then there is the nasty new American conservative movement's Rush Limbaugh definition that I'm sure you already know.
There is the original meaning of liberal:
free, belonging to the people, not restricted, generous, not strict, tolerant of views other than one's own, broad-minded, favoring reform or progress.
Then there is the nasty new American conservative movement's Rush Limbaugh definition that I'm sure you already know.
Julie D | 12:58 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
I was embarrassed for our "leaders" last night after watching the
debate. They sounded like two children - "He did this." "I did
not." It's too bad that Huckabee is such a bigoted jerk, Ron P.
isn't electable, McCain is a liar, and Mitt can't relax and be one of
the people. My choice between the bunch? Mitt. He's the only one who is
even close to being what the US needs. If McCain wins the nomination, it may be
the first time I don't vote for a President, and that makes me sad.
Bill Shakespear | 1:07 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
"one may smile and smile and be a villian." Please people see through
McCains BOLD FACED LIES. This cannot go on-he has to be stopped before his
tyranny reaches an all time high. How many people in how many countries will we
as a nation offend and be begging forgiveness from when McCain offends one their
leaders? Show him that is does not have a mandate from Republicans..
liberal means change is good | 1:13 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Inspite of the most nasty and incivility America hasn't seen since the
Civil War people who supported slavery, the goodness of American is manifesting
itself in its liberalness. And for reasons only the nutty far-right know, is
about to turn things around for us all.
Selective Censoring | 1:14 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Wow! Earlier today I posted a posting taking the same format as those who yell
wrote their postings in multi-line fashion rooting for Romney in 2008, only mine
said, "Romney, Flip Flopper, Flop Flipper, Flip Flopper!" Romney
won't win!
Nothing offensive, given another's point of view. I simply copied a format that was allowed for the pro-Romney folks, but evidently not for a counter-Romney statement.
Sounds like the moderator of this web site just isn't going to play fair. Too bad. I thought the DMN had gotten past that petty approach to censoring.
Nothing offensive, given another's point of view. I simply copied a format that was allowed for the pro-Romney folks, but evidently not for a counter-Romney statement.
Sounds like the moderator of this web site just isn't going to play fair. Too bad. I thought the DMN had gotten past that petty approach to censoring.
Mike W | 1:23 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Juan McCain is a disaster not only for the republican party but for America as a
whole should he win. Watch the illegals continue to come across in droves,
watch crime continue to escalate, and watch more and more neighborhoods turn
into Kearns or Rose Park.
Please Pay Attention | 1:26 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Pay close attention to what we are witnessing because it is quite possibly the
last time we will see a highly qualified business person attempt to attain the
presidency and apply sound business principles to leading this nation. Nothing
short of that will give us much chance of climbing out of the mess we are in.
McCain, Obama and Clinton are one and the same. Our only hope of trying a
disciplined, business approach to solving our nation's problems is Mitt
Romney and we are apparently going to miss the opportunity.
ed from florida | 1:29 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
comprisers
CEOs are ... well, CEO's | 1:39 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Businessmen, in my experience, are generally more idealistic than politicians.
Businessmen really do make deals with a handshake. No one would dream of doing
that with Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi or the Clintons. . . .
I don't view this as an argument in Romney's favor. As President, he wouldn't be dealing with honorable, law-abiding businesspeople. He would be going up against the Vladimir Putins, Osama bin Ladens and Harry Reids of the world.
We need statesmen - not businessmen
I don't view this as an argument in Romney's favor. As President, he wouldn't be dealing with honorable, law-abiding businesspeople. He would be going up against the Vladimir Putins, Osama bin Ladens and Harry Reids of the world.
We need statesmen - not businessmen
ed from florida | 1:45 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Wow. I cannot believe the number of comments that support compromise. Yes,
compromise is necessary, like in a home, or among siblings, or at work. But I
thought we lived in a democracy where we the people vote. And if 51% of the
people vote in favor of something then why do we have to placate the 49% who
lost? That is what I fear about a McCain nomination. He is and will continue to
stand on an issue just to get the nomination (or election) and then after he is
in office (if he wins) he will give away what was voted for. He will not fall on
his sword, as he claims he will -- at least Pres. Bush has tried to do that most
of the time. Back to compromising. We vote, we have chosen, and then we let
judges, a new Congress, or a new political team in town (or Washington) change
what we voted for. To quote a wonderful book I am familiar with -- there must be
opposition in all things. That is why compromise in a democracy is bad
'cause once your vote means nothing, uh-oh, no more democracy.
Ron Poll | 1:59 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Ron Paul might stand a chance if he didn't sound like a wacko every time he
talks. It's like, the words he speaks are true, but he delivers them with
the air of a conspiracy theorist, like, as if he were sharing his story about
being abducted by aliens. I like the guy. He obviously knows how the world
works. But, yeah, he comes off as such a wacko.
aninymous | 2:06 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
let's atart a movement, leave the vote space blank in the general election
in Nov.8, this will send a message to Mc.Gain and our turn-coar Gov Huntsman.
Get a Grip | 2:09 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
to: ed from FLorida
What are you smoking? You think there should be no compromise in a democracy? Democracy cannot survive without compromise. Move to Cuba, or China, or Venezuela. You won't have to compromise in any of those places. You'll just have to do as your told.
What are you smoking? You think there should be no compromise in a democracy? Democracy cannot survive without compromise. Move to Cuba, or China, or Venezuela. You won't have to compromise in any of those places. You'll just have to do as your told.
Shame On McCain.... | 2:19 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Romney was leading in Florida until McCain slandered him last Saturday with the
lie that Romney wanted a "get out of Iraq" date. Go search the
Arizona Star newspaper for an article in Jan 07 stating this: "John McCain,
R-Ariz., one of the most stalwart supporters of the war in Iraq, said Thursday
that he might propose that the Iraqi government meet certain benchmarks for the
United States to continue its engagement.
Fellow senators and independent political scientists said McCain's thinking reflected growing concerns within the Republican Party about the course of the war, and also might mark a turning point for the likely 2008 presidential contender, whose previous unconditional backing of the war may have hurt his prospects. McCain said Thursday that he hadn't yet decided on precise benchmarks. "They'd have to be specific, and they (Iraqi government officials) would have to meet them," he said.
Asked what penalty would be imposed if Iraq failed to meet his benchmarks, he said: "I think everybody knows the consequences. Haven't met the benchmarks? Obviously, then, we're not able to complete the mission. Then you have to examine your options."
And then McCain criticizes Romney for "benchmarks"? Sickening....
Fellow senators and independent political scientists said McCain's thinking reflected growing concerns within the Republican Party about the course of the war, and also might mark a turning point for the likely 2008 presidential contender, whose previous unconditional backing of the war may have hurt his prospects. McCain said Thursday that he hadn't yet decided on precise benchmarks. "They'd have to be specific, and they (Iraqi government officials) would have to meet them," he said.
Asked what penalty would be imposed if Iraq failed to meet his benchmarks, he said: "I think everybody knows the consequences. Haven't met the benchmarks? Obviously, then, we're not able to complete the mission. Then you have to examine your options."
And then McCain criticizes Romney for "benchmarks"? Sickening....
different strokes | 2:31 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Ron Poll 1:59 -
Today, I am sad to say, that such a straight-shooter and obvious intellectual whom almost every person relates to (even though he may have a single hair out of place) would be considered a 'wacko'.
You don't sound like the kind of a person I'd enjoy having a beer with.
Today, I am sad to say, that such a straight-shooter and obvious intellectual whom almost every person relates to (even though he may have a single hair out of place) would be considered a 'wacko'.
You don't sound like the kind of a person I'd enjoy having a beer with.
ed from florida | 2:35 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
dear "get a grip" and other compromisers.
At election time candidates tell you what they stand for and then you choose one to represent you at whatever level of government they are seeking office. Assume he/she wins. Now, do you want that individual; who is representing your for 2, 4, or 6 years; to compromise away your choices/to compromise his election spiel? That is what is wrong with this country -- people are not willing to live with what the majority (as in democracy) want. If I come out on the short side of a ballot initiative that raises taxes I certainly will pay my share AND I will do all I can next election to vote out whomever caused that increase. Obviously, using your thinking process, the politicians can wrangle out a better deal, even though the majority of the people have spoken. What has happened to our representative government, as in House of Representatives? You, not me, are the one who is going to have to be doing what you are told.
At election time candidates tell you what they stand for and then you choose one to represent you at whatever level of government they are seeking office. Assume he/she wins. Now, do you want that individual; who is representing your for 2, 4, or 6 years; to compromise away your choices/to compromise his election spiel? That is what is wrong with this country -- people are not willing to live with what the majority (as in democracy) want. If I come out on the short side of a ballot initiative that raises taxes I certainly will pay my share AND I will do all I can next election to vote out whomever caused that increase. Obviously, using your thinking process, the politicians can wrangle out a better deal, even though the majority of the people have spoken. What has happened to our representative government, as in House of Representatives? You, not me, are the one who is going to have to be doing what you are told.
Todd, Herriman | 2:33 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
It should surprise absolutely no one that our Liberal Governor would vote for
the most Liberal Republican in the Nation. Governor Huntsman is bored with being
the Gov and he wants to be in a McCain administration. This is just another
example of the Good ol� Boy network. McCain can not and
will not beat Hilary or Obama. So let�s get ready for
Madame President. Thanks Gov you just helped weaken a nation today.
P.S. I hope you sit right next to Governor Romney at President Hinckley�s funeral on Saturday. I would love to here how you weasel out of this one.
P.S. I hope you sit right next to Governor Romney at President Hinckley�s funeral on Saturday. I would love to here how you weasel out of this one.
McCain FAKE! | 2:39 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
McCain shifts with the wind and will lie to get votes. His behavior over the
past couple weeks has convinced me he is a fake and I can see right through his
dirty politics. There is no problem pointing out platform differences or
bringing up facts from a candidates' record but the line is drawn when lies
start flying. McCain has crossed that line. I only HOPE people will not accept
his lies as truth. Be aware that McCain's record shows he is more a
liberal than a conservative. Please vote wisley on Tuesday. I don't see
McCain as presidential material and I don't think America needs a liar as
president.
rick | 2:45 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
what a joke when Gov. swartz backed McCain some joker from a solar company blew
smoke for several minutes touting his company. It kind of shows you who's
being bought by special interests. I worry what it's going to cost all of
us in pay backs. I'm tired of persons without integrity being bought by
greedy corporations. Puppets. It's just too bad that most common folks
can't see the true costs of electing Washington as usual clowns. Mitt might
be wealthy but he isn't taking on a lot of pay back IOUs McCain is really
some hero, I was under the impression that real hero's couldn't be
bought. What a phoney.
handlebar from WYO | 2:40 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
to: get a grip. You may be right on some issue for compromise but compromise on
some issue is just plain flushing your right down the toilet. McCain was behind
the Fairness Doctrine. A stake in the First Amendment. If McCain makes it the
the presidency (heaven forbid) he will go down in history as the worst president
next to Jimmy C. McCain will sell us down the river just so that we "can
all get along". Lock up the dog here comes the IRS
Ron Poll | 2:43 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Different Strokes - I think you misunderstand me. I'm not talking at all
about WHAT Ron Paul says. I thought I made that abundantly clear. My problem is
his tone. Seriously, he just goes off spouting all these things he has to say as
if he were going to explode. My point was that if he could calm down and conduct
himself with a bit of decorum, he'd get a lot more support. About the beer,
I don't drink beer, as maybe you supposed, but if you like what Ron Paul
says, like I do, I would love having a drink with you. And no, I won't
insist that you drink something other than beer. I have neither the nerve nor
reason to do something like that. And, of course, even if I did, you
wouldn't respect that behest, because you're a free-thinking agent in
a complex world. Back to Ron Paul, I really do lament that he couldn't
change his tone, 'cause I agree with most things he says.
Want Romney? | 2:54 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
To those who want Romney in the White House (which seems like the vast majority
of us here). I was thinking last night after the debate how I think I probably
should have blogged on NON-UTAH on-line newspapers instead of the Deseret News.
Why? True, there are some rabid anti-Mormons here and some anti-Mitt folks but
(at least for this election) there's enough people in Utah who like Romney
that he'll win the state delegates pretty easily. I think we should have
carried the Mitt torch in other states harder. As for me, I think I'll
start posting comments in non-UT Super Tuesday states. On-line magazines like
Newsweek are good too. I have posted there many, many times. Watch out for a
poster named "HolyRoller". He's very lost.....
Go Mitt!
Go Mitt!
Get a Grip | 2:50 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
to: ed
Pay attention to what you yourself said. It is a representative democracy. Our representatives go to Washington and they work with other representatives to work out the best deal they can for their constituencies and the country. Those deals come by compromise because the same people who elected your representative are not the sames ones who elected the others.
Lear a little Civics and maybe you will understand how our government works.
Pay attention to what you yourself said. It is a representative democracy. Our representatives go to Washington and they work with other representatives to work out the best deal they can for their constituencies and the country. Those deals come by compromise because the same people who elected your representative are not the sames ones who elected the others.
Lear a little Civics and maybe you will understand how our government works.
dkj | 2:56 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
I've always voted republican until now, but McCain does nothing form me.
All he's going to do is continue the Bush policies.
We�ll spend additional billions on a civil war that cannot be won. I'll we've done is stirred up a hornets nest over there creating a whole new generation of people who hate the USA because they perceive us as imperialist invaders from a sinful nation. Frankly I have respect for anyone who can waive their own title of liberty in memory of their God, their religion, their freedom, and their peace, their wives, and their children. We need to find a way out of Iraq. We just can�t afford to be there to help people who don�t want to be helped.
He (like W) also wants to grant amnesty to those of have who have entered this country with no interest in obeying, honoring, or sustaining the law.
On the other hand I cannot support a Billery Clinton presidency.
If Romney can�t overtake McCain then I guess I�m voting Obama.
We�ll spend additional billions on a civil war that cannot be won. I'll we've done is stirred up a hornets nest over there creating a whole new generation of people who hate the USA because they perceive us as imperialist invaders from a sinful nation. Frankly I have respect for anyone who can waive their own title of liberty in memory of their God, their religion, their freedom, and their peace, their wives, and their children. We need to find a way out of Iraq. We just can�t afford to be there to help people who don�t want to be helped.
He (like W) also wants to grant amnesty to those of have who have entered this country with no interest in obeying, honoring, or sustaining the law.
On the other hand I cannot support a Billery Clinton presidency.
If Romney can�t overtake McCain then I guess I�m voting Obama.
ed from florida | 3:02 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Dear "Get a Grip" and other compromisers.
Prior to an election candidates espouse their position on the issues and you find one who stands for what you believe in and you vote for him/her. Off he/she goes to wherever, depending on the level of government of the office. I want that person to represent the majority who elected him/her and to, if necessary, fall on his/her sword. If he/she wants to change then he/she needs to come back to that majority and obtain permission. That is called representative government, as in House of Representatives. Or would you prefer we call it House of Compromise (which is, unfortunately, where many members have compromised their principles)? In the good ole USofA the majority rules, and I would want that to continue. So, based on your thinking process, allowing your representative to compromise your position without your approval means that you, not I, will be doing as he/she is told. Is that what you really want?
Prior to an election candidates espouse their position on the issues and you find one who stands for what you believe in and you vote for him/her. Off he/she goes to wherever, depending on the level of government of the office. I want that person to represent the majority who elected him/her and to, if necessary, fall on his/her sword. If he/she wants to change then he/she needs to come back to that majority and obtain permission. That is called representative government, as in House of Representatives. Or would you prefer we call it House of Compromise (which is, unfortunately, where many members have compromised their principles)? In the good ole USofA the majority rules, and I would want that to continue. So, based on your thinking process, allowing your representative to compromise your position without your approval means that you, not I, will be doing as he/she is told. Is that what you really want?
Mormons for Huckabee | 3:18 p.m. Jan. 31, 2008
Enter commentGov. Mike Huckabee is the only true conservative running for
president. American needs Mike Huckabee.
Don't forget, George Romney walked out on Barry Goldwater's convention speech.
Don't forget, George Romney walked out on Barry Goldwater's convention speech.
- Page:
- < Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next >
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
Gabriel Bouys, Getty Images
Republican presidential hopefuls Mike Huckabee, left, Ron Paul, John McCain and Mitt Romney participate in a 90-minute CNN debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library on Wednesday.
Related content
- These guys love a good argument 12:56 p.m.
- Vonn skis out in slalom 12:40 p.m.
- Boyle's album tops Britain's charts 12:35 p.m.
- Woods says accident 'my fault' 12:28 p.m.
- Preventing small plane crashes 12:13 p.m.
- Giving heart to women who exercise 11:55 a.m.
- 4 police officers shot dead in Wash. 11:50 a.m.
- Leno losing his audience to DVR 11:43 a.m.
- Northeast scallopers decry cuts 11:29 a.m.
- $ needed to ease U.N. climate deal 11:17 a.m.
- Hall mouths off about hate of Utah
- BYU is champion of the state
- Cougars beat Utes in overtime
- Credit Coug defense for win
- Cave to be sealed with body inside
- Field goals, penalties doomed Utes
- Cougar defense rose to occasion
- Marriage definitions vary widely
- Jones' joy for life remembered
- Banged up Jazz get best of Blazers
- Hall mouths off about hate of Utah
451 - Cougars beat Utes in overtime447
- Thunder rolls by Jazz136
- Man trapped in Nutty Putty cave dies116
- Cave to be sealed with body inside115
- Editorial: Poor welcome for Palin113
- BYU is champion of the state101
- Rivalry Week is highly profane89
- Hall's legacy measured today76
- Y. focused on 10-win season73
I wanted to tell them not to go. I dropped subtle hints. "My money is on...
When I was a kid, I worshipped my grandpa. He was undoubtedly my hero....
Latest comments
You fumbled it again Max. You've turned into everything you claim to hate.
Congratulations BYU. Max, only thing more classless than a sore loser is a...
It's amazing to read all these Ute fans all riled up about being lumped in...
"So can you feel the love? Max Hall's post game comments are far from humble...
Oh my goodness!!! That is a so sad! My husband is a police officer and I can...
Nobody wanted to play BYU in its bowl game in 1984. So there is no asterisk...
embarrased by his remarks. He is not right, so I won't get over it. Get...
Again the Utah fans are poor little victims. Two years ago it was mean...
There's two very different issues: 1) must society call homosexual unions by...
Win or lose the Utah State fans stay for everything. Those are what real...
Advertisements