Reader comments
Plans for Cottonwood Mall leap forward
44 comments | Read story
It is quite concerning that more residents don't speak up in outrage. Let's take away from the students to give to businesses...
This 25% is an increase of roughly $700,000 a year more then they are getting now. And at the end of the 20 year period, they will be getting almost $4,000,000 more then they are getting now.
They aren't losing any money the decision. They are in fact going to be getting more.
So would all of the people who are upset that the School District voted for this be willing to get more money without losing money?
This is something that everyone should want the School District to do. Think of the children first. Thankfully, they did.
In all seriousness, it isn't a bad idea to theme it. I think a great mall is to take it one step further and completely replicate Venice with the square, Il Doge's palace, St. Peters Shoppilica, the Bridge of Sighs (could be a cool location for books or computer stuff or Spencers gifts) and the Rialto bridge. I would shop there.
The main problem the county had with it was that the hotels that were "funding" the stadium are all in Downtown SLC and the stadium is in Sandy where the "funding source" will not see an impact.
If the stadium would have been allowed to be in Downtown SLC like originally planed prior to Curtis stepping in and trying to take the glory, the County wouldn't have had a problem with it.
This story is about the Cottonwood Mall redevelopment. Which will not take money away from the school district but will rather give them more.
GSD doesn't write a check to anyone, and they aren't "gambling" with the kids' money (as Van Tassell from the Taxpayers Assoc said last night). If anything, the gamble would be for the Board to have voted no in hopes of luring another developer in without the RDA status. And ooh boy - then we could watch the mall sit vacant for another 2-3 years and watch the traffic at Macy's and TGIF totally dry up - wouldn't that be the way to go?!
Here's a story problem for all you well-educated "tax advocates": do I want $171k (and shrinking) to spend on our kids, or do I want to give them $900k/year now and $4 MILLION+ in a few years? Hmmm - let me think about that one...
Granite School DIstrict is in the mall development business?
I thought they were supposed to be teaching kids to read and write, and that schools are all begging for money.
I guess I was wrong, they have $52M laying around [forcibly taken from us TAXPAYERS!] to "invest" in some Ponzi scheme that may pay more someday?
This is WRONG on so many levels!
Never, NEVER! again tell me our schools need more money!
VOTE AGAINST EVERY POLITICIAN WHO SUPPORTS THIS NONSENSE!
Where were all the naysayers when the board met? More than 200 people attended the meeting and only two spoke against the project -- one of them being with the Utah Taxpayers Assn. -- and his remarks were comical. The other was a gentleman who opposes the principle of tax increment funding. He presented his opinion in a most impressive manner.
www dot cityofholladay dot com - Cottonwood Mall section on the left menu.
Maybe the Deseret Morning News reporters could track down where they are posting from.
My bet is that the educrats (or the RDA folks) are trying to BS the public every way they can to slip this deal through before anyone starts asking why a school district is even allowed to commit SCHOOL money to "investment" schemes.
Thay are doing it to harvest the free money that just grows on trees? Sorry, I don't buy that one.
Who would be fronting that $52M if the school district did not? Why are they passing up this good deal? Is ANYONE connected with Granite School District benefitting in ANY way from this deal, directly or indirectly, now or in the future?
This whole deal smells worse than brine shrimp!
No, the district's tax revenue do not go up to $900,000. It does increase from $137,000 to $172,000 immediately, though.
Then, as the property's taxes increase, the district get's an additional 25% of the increase. After 20 years, the district gets its full share of the new taxes on the completed project. It is NOT $4 million; closer to $2.1 million.
The hand-wringing by some district officials is that over the 20-year RDA's life, because of the increase in the property's value the district will forgo collecting $52 million in FUTURE tax dollars, until the 20 years is up.
No doubt, without Granite's participation, this developer would back out and some other developer would create a less lucrative project.
I would imagine that a huge percentage of the posts here have not done research beyond today's paper. I was at the meeting last night...were you?
About Cottonwood Mall, though I've always prefered Fashion Place I have fond memories from childhood of Cottonwood as well... I'll miss it. It's a shame it turned into the ghost town it became in the end. What's being built in it's place is something totally new and different and should be a very nice addition to the area.
In the next ten years, until the Mall starts giving back all these big bucks, the taxpayers in Granite District should not be asked for any additional tax money.
Apparently, the District has money to burn!!!
Word "burn" reminds me how the District decided to rebuild Wasatch after the fire. Property could have been sold for enough to build three new schools somewhere else. The property alone could have been sold for mega bucks. Besides, there wasn't actually even a need in that area for another Jr. High.
I don't think our school or State money should be used for any commercial endeavor, including REAL.
There is NO POWER GIVE AWAY! Please do not speak of things you don't know. Get informed!
A bad deal for Granite would have been sitting on an empty mall the next 10 years. The building site has many difficulties being that it is in a massive flood plain.
I guess living in Utah, a lot of people around here are the definition of jumping over a dollar to grab a penny.
Bypassing this project would have been the definition of jumping over a dollar to grab a penny. I think people struggle with math out here.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Considering adoption? 11:49 a.m.
- Social events become solitary 11:43 a.m.
- USA Today poll 11:33 a.m.
- US says sanctions possible for Iran 11:13 a.m.
- TCU stays 4th in AP; Y. 19th, U. 23rd 11:12 a.m.
- French, Afghan troops push on 10:47 a.m.
- In quieter Baghdad, bingo is back 10:45 a.m.
- Germans ID convert as terror suspect 10:44 a.m.
- Serb Patriarch Pavle dies 10:25 a.m.
- Palin's way of talkin' dissected 10:24 a.m.
- SLC council OKs gay rights policies
359 - BYU happy to escape with victory
208 - Editorial: Mormons and gay rights
200 - TCU creams U.
173 - Will state consider gay rights law?
148 - Letters: Strange breed in Utah
130 - Can BYU root for (ick) Utah Utes?
130 - Utes remain silent about BCS
120 - Celtics crush Jazz
104 - Sloan may toy with starting lineup
87
If you are looking for a bird on the cheap, the following specials from...
How do you handle kids and contests? Our oldest daughter, 7, is of the...
Congrats Rebels it was a great team effort, what is most impressive about...
Congratulations, TCU. Wyoming and New Mexico remain and anything can...
Oops he did it again. Barberi opens mouth, removes all doubt.
Byu makes me sick!
Name calling seems to be the depth of the debate for some. Please at least...
The article was confusing, the writer needs to make sure his history and...
We played against Riverton this year twice and they have a girl named Darian...
happen as long as perverse socialist policies are the topic of the "summits"....
We own two of Fred Conlon little metal pieces that our children bought us for...
Ribbit Ribbit Ribbit Ribbit
