Reader comments
My view: Extra funds should go to disabled

5 comments   |   Read story

Grandma Jean | 7:52 a.m. Jan. 15, 2008
I agree with the comments in this article. It is incredibly expensive to have a family member living in a facility and not always necessary. But the reality of caring for a disabled or elderly person is overwhelming. I especially the idea of a time bank and volunteers for caregiver respite.

With an aging population, we will need to have more options and a good time to start is now before the system is more overloaded. Many caregivers are the same age as the person requiring care--70's and 80's or older than 65. The health of the caregiver is affected by all that is required.
Sylvia | 11:20 a.m. Jan. 15, 2008
Respite care that is tailored to a families needs will benefit everyone. The caregiver will not burn out as fast and be able to address his/her own needs. A haircut or a visit to the dentist often has to be delayed or canceled all together because there is no one to care for the person with "disabilities".
Give it back | 12:17 p.m. Jan. 15, 2008
Sorry, extra funds should be given back. Then let those people decide how they want to use them. Quit trying to stake a claim on something that never has been yours.
Comments continue below
right on! | 4:20 p.m. Jan. 15, 2008
Well done -- and now get it done! start by moving funds from the developmental center to community services. and holding the states feet to the fire about how much it really costs to keep people in the institution (and all the employees .. the grounds... ).
Heidi Hilton | 1:06 p.m. Jan. 22, 2008
People on the waiting list have already qualified for services under strict legal guidelines--they're not asking for "extra funds." They're asking the legislature to fund the program that is already in existence and is miserably underfunded. It's a little like signing your 5-year-old child up for kindergarten and then being told you'll be put on a waiting list. We'll send you to school someday, sweetie. Some disabled people stay on the waiting list for years, even decades. Taking care of those who can't care for themselves is a legitimate function of government.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Advertisement
previousnext

Latest comments

i hear that the number 8 kid is the best on the team

12 high schools ready for 'The Turf'

If you like those stadiums, move to Texas. And don't try to minimize the...

Semper Fi: now we have a Marine in charge, now we can get something done.

If he doesn't have a steady income, he can do what the rest of us do. He can...

RE: Buy American | 5:12 a.m. Nov. 8, 2009 - I have lived in Japan (4 years)...

Lee has worked closely with judges, justices, and executive and legislative...

Seniors helped BYU regroup

Are you serious? Leadership is planning and preparing before something...

Gay advocates trek to LDS office

"The ignorance and bigotry on the part of some people is shameful and truly...

This is very different than when we rounded up Japanese Americans after Pearl...

Get out of the bubble and live life!

@1:36 PM One can have any variety of opinions regarding public policy...

Advertisements
Advertisement