Reader comments
Process would make coal burn cleaner

1 comment   |   Read story

Doug Wendel | 10:54 a.m. Jan. 14, 2008
Sorry, I made the following comment elsewhere and thought I was commenting on this article.

This article states that most of the cost of sequestering CO2 is for separating it out. If the plant effluent was used to grow algae and produce biodiesel, the algae would separate the CO2 for you and you could recover much of your costs by selling the biodiesel. Check out the Central Utah Biodiesel Project!

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

previousnext

Latest comments

God bless his family and poor wife and kids. What a tragic story. I can...

If you meant to say 'since when was killing fun?', it's been fun for...

The State has an obligation to insure that agencies it regulates meet and...

Everyone seems to forget that the defensive line also puts pressure on the...

To Stewardship and others: It's very likely that the decision to go LED is...

Seitz was way, way overrated. He was too slow. This was a smart play by RSL.

Thunder rolls by Jazz

Even sloan uses 0 cliques at halftime interview, instead, putting his...

Won't they be dimmer? Won't you have to buy more for the same intensity of...

Thunder rolls by Jazz

Todd, The players have obviously responded to our new and restructured front...

Korver's return hits snag

Korver you need to man up! There has been better players than you that have...

Advertisements