Comments about ‘Process would make coal burn cleaner’
Removing carbon dioxide from emissions studied
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Cottonwood High School football coach Josh...
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large sodas...
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Family at first sight: Girl with Down...
- Investigators focus on stains in car of dead...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
29 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
24 - Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
21 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
20 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13






Sorry, I made the following comment elsewhere and thought I was commenting on this article.
This article states that most of the cost of sequestering CO2 is for separating it out. If the plant effluent was used to grow algae and produce biodiesel, the algae would separate the CO2 for you and you could recover much of your costs by selling the biodiesel. Check out the Central Utah Biodiesel Project!
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments