Comments about ‘A win in Iowa caucuses doesn't really mean much’
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- Letter: The question of morality in gay...
- Letter: Help individuals, but stop...
- Letter: Two junior senators would spell...
- Letter: Middle class workers are real job...
- Letter: Hatch is an ace
- Lois M. Collins: Don't think your...
- Mitt Romney's school surprise: A look at his...
- Teach, practice safe behavior to avoid...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- My view: Adjusting the definition of...
54 - Letter: Job creation should be a top...
41 - Letter: Health and health care
35 - Letter: Remember, Howell is still in...
33 - Letter: The question of morality in gay...
29 - Letter: Help individuals, but stop...
27 - Letter: Enough class warfare
26 - Letter: Hatch is an ace
26






I wonder if thissame article would have been written had Bernicks favorite boy won the prize? Chances are, it would have been very different. Oh well, just another day at the "Mitt Morning News".
I totally agree with the first post. Had Mittney won, Iowa would just about have guaranteed the presidency and vindicated mormonism in the article. Somewhere, an angel would have received wings, probably.
WOW, THAT WAS ONE OF THE MOST PATHETIC THINGS I'VE EVER READ!
Straight from Mitt's mouth: "In order to win the White House, I need to win both New Hampshire and Iowa"--Manchester Union-Leader, December 22. Now it's "just because you won the silver in one event doesn't mean you can't come back and win the gold". Romney's flip flops make even John Kerry look resolute and unchanging.
Very interesting. Actually, I know that some supporters are going to try to throw Utah to Ron Paul by electing delegates in support of him. Whether this is ethical or not is unknown?
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments