Reader comments
Phones, traffic linked
11 comments | Read story
If everyone talked on their phones while driving then everyone would enjoy that time savings and their lives would be better.
How does talking on a hands free cell while driving differ from talking to other people in the car? I doubt it's very different. If so it would make any cell phone driving legislation, as well as the bumber stickers, very unfair.
Other studies have shown that driving while holding and talking on a cell is no more impairing than driving while eating a hot dog. Should we legislate and make bumper stickers against that? Whine at any driver who does it? I hope not. We need to accommodate other drivers and their needs, even if it slows us down by one second per minute.
Actually, the most recent study conducted at the University of Utah (iirc) showed that talking on a cell phone was as likely, or more so, to cause an accident than being over the .08 BAC required for a DUI conviction.
I admit I do it if I'm expecting a call from my kid, for example. Then again, I also tailgate the heck out of the person in front of me if s/he is on the phone and not keeping up w/ traffic. How is that for rational behavior?!?!?
The scariest driver I ever saw was traveling while smoking with her left hand out the window, and talking on her cell with her right. Really scary!
I hope they do outlaw talking & driving -- I've seen what can happen when I let myself be distracted by my cellphone while driving, and I've seen how dangerous others can be -- yikes!
Please, let's hang up & just drive! Losing your life, or costing someone else theirs isn't worth 20 minutes saved somewhere else -- what if you don't make it there?!
Legislation will never pass making them illegal because then it would also have to be illegal to drive and eat a Big Mac or Whopper, etc, and some very large companies' lobbyists ain'ta gonna let that happen.
Shaving, putting on makeup, tying a tie, all are just as risky.
Bluetooth and other hands-free devices help, and voice dialing technology is getting better fast.
I had one of the first car cellphones, around 1982, and cops would pull up beside me and watch if I was talking. Never did get pulled over, though I heard of others challenged.
We did report a lot of speeding and dangerous drivers; maybe more good done than harm?
No Worries,
Your time is not worth anyone's life. Get a clue.
I don't talk on my cell phone because I don't want everyone jumping to the conclusion that I am going "slow" because I'm on my phone. I am driving safely. Whether I am on my phone or not has nothing to do with my speed. I will go 65 regardless. It is safer and better on gas mileage at the same time.
So all of you road-raged drivers who tailgate me and harrass me to move over- I'm already in the right-hand lane, I will not speed up for you, and by the way- get off YOUR phone. Go endanger someone else's life- not mine- and save your precious 19 seconds of time.
This article is flawed in that it doesn't define what speed the supposed "slow people" on their cell phones are driving. If they are driving 65, the fault should be with everyone else who is breaking the law by speeding.
Seems that the "world revolves around you". Seems like you meant we need to accomodate you. How about the talk time savings vs. the loss of life. How equitable is that?
Our lives would be a lot better without cell phones in general, not just driving. We're reachable for work all the time, half the calls we take or make aren't wanted. They're only good for emergencies. Oh and they're making us think of personal conversations in terms of task efficiency. That's no good either.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- 'Dinosaur Odyssey' an insight to life 8:44 p.m.
- Couple dies within 48 hours of other 8:44 p.m.
- E-mail illegally sent for Bridgewater 8:42 p.m.
- Smoky smell at hospital from welders 8:27 p.m.
- Panel recommends raising food tax 8:13 p.m.
- BYU football: What others are saying 7:45 p.m.
- Should districts pay union reps? 7:12 p.m.
- I-80 reconstruction finally done 6:55 p.m.
- Child porn case nets fed sentence 6:44 p.m.
- Groups celebrate Dobbs' CNN exit 6:43 p.m.
- House passes health care bill
333 - SLC council OKs gay rights policies
317 - TCU showdown has big implications
195 - Senators want food tax restored
158 - Cougars crush hapless Cowboys
155 - Editorial: Mormons and gay rights
139 - Will state consider gay rights law?
137 - Utah Jazz fall apart against Kings
131 - TCU 4th in AP poll; U. 16th, Y. 22nd
119 - Letters: Strange breed in Utah
118
One of my guilty pleasures is perusing the covers of celebrity magazines...
The galactic center shines like firelight through gaps in …
56% 3rd down conversions = Few punts. BYU leads the nation in 3rd down...
No one should be forced to pay for someone else's abortion. It's not a...
Who's the best coach in the nation? Kyle.
The State only requires the city to provide 20 psi min, not 50.
To the 6:06 commentator, In 1987 the Supreme Court ruled that religious...
There are no such things as Union Reps for teachers. Utah is a right to work...
Before we let Las Vegas have the water from Snake Valley ecosystem, everybody...
are you talking about the 528 "legal" perscription drugs deaths in Utah last...
How about solving TWO PROBLEMS at once. Put an additional "income" tax on...
Max Hall a disappointment? What's your QB rating? What's that you say, never...


