Reader comments
Poinsettia Bowl: Officials concede call was incorrect
112 comments | Read story
What up D-News? | 1:26 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Why do you have a BYU-homer like Scott Taylor writing about the Utes? Obviously,
Taylor was going to pick something negative to write about, and he did. Next
time D-News, try having someone that knows even a tiny, little bit about the
team write something.
NachoGrande | 2:05 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
You are right Scott let's play the what if game...
-What if Ludwig could have figured out before the second half that passing on Navy actually works?
-What if Navy passed for 800 yards and ran for 300 yards?
-What if the nation wasn't at war at this time, would Navy had won?
-What if aliens came down during the game looking for signs of intelligence and you were passed over?
-What if Austin Collie was playing for Navy, would God have blessed the Midshipment with a victory?
-What if you had 3 friends who could sell my "miralce health juice" to their 3 friends, etc.
I think there is one thing we can all agree on, what if you your silly article wasn't published... we would all be better off.
-What if Ludwig could have figured out before the second half that passing on Navy actually works?
-What if Navy passed for 800 yards and ran for 300 yards?
-What if the nation wasn't at war at this time, would Navy had won?
-What if aliens came down during the game looking for signs of intelligence and you were passed over?
-What if Austin Collie was playing for Navy, would God have blessed the Midshipment with a victory?
-What if you had 3 friends who could sell my "miralce health juice" to their 3 friends, etc.
I think there is one thing we can all agree on, what if you your silly article wasn't published... we would all be better off.
Anonymous | 2:11 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
face it the utes can't win unless they get breaks from the stips...but
enjoy your spectacular victory over a weak academy football team. harline and
collie are still open!
Comments continue below
grumpolman | 5:56 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Sounds like the Utes give credence to the phrase "It's better to be
lucky than good". How can you criticise the D-News for writing something
negative about the officials admitting a major blown call when the utes are
endlessly complaining about two obvious calls against them at BYU claiming
"that's why we lost". When a call in their bowl game probably
made the difference in their lucky win.
Irrelevant | 6:22 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Utah didn't score, Navy went 4 and out. And I don't want to hear any
of this "well they would have scored if starting from the 20 and not the 1
inch line" from any BYU fans looking to discredit another win. If you
really think where the ball was changes Navy's playcalling then I would
disagree. I don't think they ran more than 4-5 different plays the whole
game anyways.
I'm not saying the call was right, it was obviously wrong...just that it shouldn't taint the win because Navy had more than enough chances.
I'm not saying the call was right, it was obviously wrong...just that it shouldn't taint the win because Navy had more than enough chances.
Anonymous | 7:20 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Hey BYU...quit whining and by the way did you hear Lou Holtz not once, not
twice, but three seperate times claim that Utah, "has the best non-BCS
personnel in the country". BYU..that includes you, regardless of what your
your weak tiny minds might think...
Pipes | 7:39 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Once again the game is decided by poor officiating and not the players. There
is no excuse for the review officals to miss that call. Someone should be held
accountable for that blunder.
Finally a call goes to Utah | 7:41 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Hey Anonymous:
Are you serious? I guess I need to remind you of the free 30 yards byu received on its final drive against Utah from 2 horrible calls.
It is nice to have a bad call go our way for a change. Now I know how it feels to be byu.
Are you serious? I guess I need to remind you of the free 30 yards byu received on its final drive against Utah from 2 horrible calls.
It is nice to have a bad call go our way for a change. Now I know how it feels to be byu.
Not Irrelevant | 7:49 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Everyone one knows, even Andy Ludwig (which it seems he doesn't know much)
that play calling at the 1 inch line is much different than at the 20. Navy got
hosed on a play call that everyone at home KNEW it was a touchback.
It is unfortunate to see Utah's good win be tainted, but it is, a bit.
I also question why Utah's play calling is so awful. Does anyone think that Whittingham shouldn't have changed the offensive scheme ONE BIT after the Fiesta Bowl run? But, does the offense resemble that one at all?
It is unfortunate to see Utah's good win be tainted, but it is, a bit.
I also question why Utah's play calling is so awful. Does anyone think that Whittingham shouldn't have changed the offensive scheme ONE BIT after the Fiesta Bowl run? But, does the offense resemble that one at all?
fed up | 8:04 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
There are DOZENS of examples over the past couple of years of game officials
getting clear, unambiguous replay feeds and still getting the call wrong.
Make them wear microphones and do their deliberations on camera so that the whole process is public. Let's see if they are corrupt, cowardly or simply stupid.
In this case I suspect cowardly. Their lame admission handed to bowl officials after they've collected their check and are on the way to the airport is little solace. There's simply no excuse.
Do replay correctly, or not at all!
Make them wear microphones and do their deliberations on camera so that the whole process is public. Let's see if they are corrupt, cowardly or simply stupid.
In this case I suspect cowardly. Their lame admission handed to bowl officials after they've collected their check and are on the way to the airport is little solace. There's simply no excuse.
Do replay correctly, or not at all!
Life'sLessons | 8:29 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Sometimes the calls from the officials are against you and sometimes they go
your way, welcome to the imperfect world of sports officiating. I had a
basketball referee tell me once �I�ll
stop making bad calls when you stop missing your shots, especially free
throws�. It is time for the Ute fans to realize that they
may have got a break this time and for the BYU fans to realize they may have got
a break in the BYU � Utah football game this year. Get
over it and learn this one lesson � Life is not always
fair, no matter what.
Little Change on Outcome | 8:36 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
The blown call had no change on the game. The triple option that Navy runs
would have had them calling the same plays on the 20 as it does on backed on
their goal-line. No body likes to see bad calls but this one had no change on
the outcome of the game.
An to Anonymous, BYU should now all to well about benefiting from bad calls, so think twice about what you write next time. As for Navy being a week oponent, BYU has lost to them more than once in a bowl game. Once again think before you write.
An to Anonymous, BYU should now all to well about benefiting from bad calls, so think twice about what you write next time. As for Navy being a week oponent, BYU has lost to them more than once in a bowl game. Once again think before you write.
No Harm, No Foul | 8:39 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Come on, Cougars! Can't we just have a truce during bowl season? Each
team needs the other to grab a bowl victory for the good of the conference. I
don't understand why some, though I'm sure a minority, of BYU fans
have to come complain about the officiating. Navy isn't a top 25 team, but
they've had a pretty good year. That Utah win was good for the MWC and
BYU.
As for the specific call, it really didn't make a difference. Navy ran the ball just about every play, and it would have been no different on the 20. Utah would have gotten the ball back inside the 30 and scored just the same. In fact, the way Navy struggled to stop the Utes in the second half, the blown call may actually have given Navy a better chance to win. If Utah got the ball on the 29 instead of the 9, it would have taken Utah that much longer to get into the end-zone, and Navy wouldn't have had as much time to get back in the game. The refs had to note the mistake, but it didn't affect the outcome.
As for the specific call, it really didn't make a difference. Navy ran the ball just about every play, and it would have been no different on the 20. Utah would have gotten the ball back inside the 30 and scored just the same. In fact, the way Navy struggled to stop the Utes in the second half, the blown call may actually have given Navy a better chance to win. If Utah got the ball on the 29 instead of the 9, it would have taken Utah that much longer to get into the end-zone, and Navy wouldn't have had as much time to get back in the game. The refs had to note the mistake, but it didn't affect the outcome.
ron in oc | 8:41 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
If it was the wrong call, too bad. Show me a game in any sport where all the
calls are perfect. I'm sure that from time to time a bad call can make a
difference but in the long run, it's the team that wins the game. I'm
a BYU fan and I loved the Utah win. Great game and I hope that Utah wins every
game they play except the BYU game.
Truth hurts | 8:44 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Win is tainted, period. It is an obvious DISADVANTAGE to start that deep in
one's own territory versus the 20.
Anonymous | 9:00 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
it would have made a difference if they did get the call right...they stuffed
them on the goal line right after that....which gave them more momentum...get
real
Irrelevant doesnt know jack | 9:01 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Of course their play calling would have been different from the 20, instead of
the 1/2.
Just look at the splits their offensive linemen were taking backed up on their goalline. Completely different situation. It was a horrible, horrible call. No excuse for that.
Just look at the splits their offensive linemen were taking backed up on their goalline. Completely different situation. It was a horrible, horrible call. No excuse for that.
wii | 9:02 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Navy should have had the ball at the 20 which would have changed the whole
complexion of the game. Face it Utah you gotta cheat um to beat um! Give the
little trophey you got to Navy!
Anonymous | 9:03 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
wow who else to write a story like this! right guys! dick harmons my boy!
Ummmm | 9:06 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
The rule book is pretty unclear on this and kind of contradictory. Look at the
NCAA Rule Book: Section 2. Out Of Bounds: Ball Out of Bounds, Article 3.a. A
ball not in player posession, other than a kick that scores a field goal, is out
of bounds when it touches the ground, a player, a game official, **or anything
else that is on or outside a boundary line.** (pylons are outside the boundary
line as article 3.b. will clarify)
b. A ball that touches a pylon is out of bounds.
So really, what should the call be? I think given the circumstances, they called it right. I think the NCAA needs to make the rule a bit more defined.
b. A ball that touches a pylon is out of bounds.
So really, what should the call be? I think given the circumstances, they called it right. I think the NCAA needs to make the rule a bit more defined.
Re: Irrelevant | 9:08 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Not discrediting the win... Just discrediting the Ute fans who BOOO HOO HOO
HOOOOOOO about things that don't seem to go in their favor, yet try to wax
eloquent over irrelevant pieces of the game that went in their favor.
We can at least agree on the fact that the win is comprised of the entire 60 minutes, and that one blown call was not the deciding factor in the game.
Maybe, rather than sticking up for the play, you should be wondering why the defense allowed Navy to score on a pass play over the middle, and recover an onside kick.
You know, when it all comes down to it, I think that sometimes when you're doing the things that you're supposed to, the good Lord looks down on you and pats you on the back and gives you a little blessing... When those things happen, it's like magic.
Re: NachoGrande - Very funny!
We can at least agree on the fact that the win is comprised of the entire 60 minutes, and that one blown call was not the deciding factor in the game.
Maybe, rather than sticking up for the play, you should be wondering why the defense allowed Navy to score on a pass play over the middle, and recover an onside kick.
You know, when it all comes down to it, I think that sometimes when you're doing the things that you're supposed to, the good Lord looks down on you and pats you on the back and gives you a little blessing... When those things happen, it's like magic.
Re: NachoGrande - Very funny!
Utah's Real Bowl game1 | 9:10 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
The Utes lost their Bowl game. It was in November. This was an example of
licking wounds and trying to forget the real pain that continues to ache.
They will feel this pain once again next year as we create Chaos for the Utes.
The Cougar devoured the Ute. All that is left is carnage.
Nice win over Navy? We always have to leave some scraps. BYU ownes Utah. Period.
They will feel this pain once again next year as we create Chaos for the Utes.
The Cougar devoured the Ute. All that is left is carnage.
Nice win over Navy? We always have to leave some scraps. BYU ownes Utah. Period.
Pedro | 9:16 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
It sounds like there are to many Ute fans that can't stand hearing that
they won by luck or a bad call made by the ref's. I don't give this
game to the ref's and I think Utah would have won either way but it is
still news when the officials actually come out and give a statement saying they
made a bad call. When was the last time you hear that happening? For me it has
never happened, officials act and feel to "high and mighty" to ever
acknowledge that they made a mistake and they would back their call to the
grave. So those of you who think this shouldn't be written are just trying
to give yourselves every out that Utah won because they were the better team.
No matter what you all think this is news and I for one am happy to see it and
give these officials credit for standing up and admitting a mistake.
LB | 9:18 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Utah crybabies! What does anything that happened on the field last night between
Utah and Navy have to do with BYU. Grow up, Utat fans!
You know, I have a BA from Utah and a MS and Ph.D. from BYU. While at Utah I noted that every single day there was an article in the Chronicle that was critical of BYU, the LDS Church, or Mormons in general. When I was at BYU working on my graduate degrees (5 total years) I noted that hardly ever, maybe once a week at the most, was there an article about the UofU, whether negative or positive.
Get a life, Utah!!!
You know, I have a BA from Utah and a MS and Ph.D. from BYU. While at Utah I noted that every single day there was an article in the Chronicle that was critical of BYU, the LDS Church, or Mormons in general. When I was at BYU working on my graduate degrees (5 total years) I noted that hardly ever, maybe once a week at the most, was there an article about the UofU, whether negative or positive.
Get a life, Utah!!!
UteGary | 9:18 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
What about the unexplainable pass interference call when the ball was behind the
receiver and uncatchable because the defender was between him and the ball. It
gave Navy a 1st down by penalty on their way to a touchdown. Wasn't that a
blown call also? You rarely hear the officials admitting a mistake. Why last
night? Why this game? They make bad calls and non-calls all the time. We
never get much of an explanation. It would be nice at the end of the season of
which official was considered as being good or not. Have the conference give
them a grade and explain if they are retained or not.
I realize these officials were not from the MWC. Thank heavens, it could have been a poorer called game.
I realize these officials were not from the MWC. Thank heavens, it could have been a poorer called game.
MikeH | 9:22 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Yeah that is why Utah was how many consecutive conference wins and
Championships?
Lou Holtz is rediculous | 9:28 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
I have to admit I gave into my BYU Pride and cheered for the Mtn west conference
last night; however, Lou Holtz' comments on Utah being the #1 non-BCS team
was absolutely rediculous. And I'm not just saying that because BYU beat
them but because Utah isn't even ranked. There are tons of non BCS teams
that are clearly better than Utah.
That comment was just rediculous. I can't believe they allow him to do play by play. Regardless of his coaching career most his comments are off the wall.
That comment was just rediculous. I can't believe they allow him to do play by play. Regardless of his coaching career most his comments are off the wall.
ron | 9:33 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
yea anon, that is why holtz is on t.v. and no longer coaching. He really knows
his stuff. Utah looked good with their passing attack the second half. Those of
us who have seen Utah play knew what was coming but navy was not able to stop
it. Congratulations to the Utes. They won the game and that is all that matters.
UteGary | 9:33 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
What about the onside kick call? It wasn't even reviewed, it should have
been. It appeared to me that Sylvester had the ball before he went down to the
ground and we couldn't see anything because of the Navy bench.
jashill | 9:38 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Why did the officials make a public statement about a blown call in this game.
Every game has several bad calls. They should have just shut up because the
announcement makes no difference, but to taint a win by a gutsy team that would
have found a way to win regardless.
BYU FAN
BYU FAN
differences | 9:43 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
the calls against Utah on the last drive by BYU are considered
"questionable" by some, the call FOR Utah against Navy was
"WRONG" there is a difference, those calls against Utah were
technically correct, but were not consistent with how they called the rest of
the game, the call for Utah was wrong, there is no technically, its just wrong
We need more info! | 9:43 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Instant replay has revealed what football loudmouths have been spewing for
years. "refs are blind" It is absolutely true(outcome of the game
aside) that refs are seeing things in a different way than the rest of the
world. How else do you explain crystal clear evidence being ignored or
interpreted in the wrong way. Replay has revealed this. It makes me wonder
what kind of personalities are officiating these games. We need more
information about the process, the evaluation, the training, etc. I completely
understand a call made in the moment; however, when there is a clear slow motion
up close view that goes the wrong way the integrity of the process is completely
undermined. WE need more info!
Outcome of the game aside.
Outcome of the game aside.
re: Lou Holtz comments | 9:46 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Come on, don't be silly. Who cares what Lou Holtz says, you sound desperate
and insecure. Do you really need validation from some guy who couldn't care
less about these teams other than the fact he's paid to talk about the
game. It's like listening to Vitale praising BYU's basketball team
against Louisville and NC -- we like to hear nice things, but don't mistake
all the praise as being sincere and serious, eh says stuff like that during
every game he announces. Besides, if Utah really does have the best personel,
what does that say about a mediocre 9-4 record? Who gets the blame for not being
better?
Carl | 9:53 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
You are not going to consider Lou Holtz an expert are you? This guy is a
complete boob and if he had not failed at some fairly prestigious universities,
he would not even have a job.
Ben | 9:54 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
After the stop, Navy chose to run a quick quarterback draw on 1st down for
minimal gain. If they had been at the twenty they probably run the option
outside and don't turn the ball over on downs (or even with the same play
calling, just cause there isn't a slick spot they don't turn it over
on downs)
There is no excuse for blowing that replay. It was not a close or difficult call. I have a small grainy TV. But when I can freeze frame the player inbounds without the ball, or So'oto on his knee with the ball and the officials aren't fixing the calls something is Rotten in the State of Denmark.
There is no excuse for blowing that replay. It was not a close or difficult call. I have a small grainy TV. But when I can freeze frame the player inbounds without the ball, or So'oto on his knee with the ball and the officials aren't fixing the calls something is Rotten in the State of Denmark.
Navy's Head Coach Comment | 10:02 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
I don't know if you saw and/or heard but Navy's head coach said that
whether they were on the 1 inch line or the 20 yard line, he STILL would have
called the same 4 plays. After all, that's all they have, fullback dive,
option QB run, option pitch, straight pitch. Do your homework BYU fans before
you bash.
Stevarino | 10:02 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
I NEVER want to hear another Yewt fan complain about reffing after this
obviously bad call against Navy. Any intelligent fan knows that bad calls go
either way in any given game. You apppreciate the ones that go for you and live
with the ones that go against you. My problem with the Yewts is that everyone
writes in as if they were a passionate fan. There was TOTAL lack of red in
the stadium. They couldn't even sell half of their allotted tickets.
What's the matter Yewt fans, your boss couldn't get anyone else to
work the drive thru window???
Fire Ludwig | 10:05 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
He had weeks to prepare for the worst pass defense in the nation and he throws
the ball seven times for 27 yards? Why does he continually outsmart himself? Why
did he not do what the rest of the nation knew to do until the 3rd quarter? The
only two what ifs here are:
What if Ludwig wasn't the OC at Utah, how good would they be?
What if Ludwig would have thrown the ball all game, would this call really have mattered?
Hey Ludwig what if, for next year, you draw up a quadruple reverse, do you think we would get negative 15 or 18 yards on the play?
What if Ludwig wasn't the OC at Utah, how good would they be?
What if Ludwig would have thrown the ball all game, would this call really have mattered?
Hey Ludwig what if, for next year, you draw up a quadruple reverse, do you think we would get negative 15 or 18 yards on the play?
OK. Regarding the Holtz comment | 10:14 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
I cheer for Utah when they're playing out of conference teams. In
conference, I don't care if they win or lose, as long as they lose to BYU.
I'm glad they beat Navy. Congrats.
However, if Utah in fact does have the best non-BCS talent in the country, they have the worst non-BCS coaching staff in the country. Again, congrats.
However, if Utah in fact does have the best non-BCS talent in the country, they have the worst non-BCS coaching staff in the country. Again, congrats.
Come On Scott | 10:15 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Certainly, the call was newsworthy and needs to be reported.
But to state that the result "certainly affected" certain things is a little over the top.
The difference in time was about 3 seconds (the time to run the 4th and goal play) so the call didn't affect game time at all. Did it "certainly affect" Navy's playcalling? According to Navy, they call the same plays whether it is 1st and 10 from their 1 or from their 20 yard line. So how can Scott say for sure it affected their playcalling?
I don't even know how he can say it "certainly" affected momentum. Stuffing Utah on the goalline certainly swung momentum in Navy's favor just 3 or 4 seconds after the would be touchback.
I think the DNews should report the error and state possible affects on the game but get rid of the "certainly" stuff.
But to state that the result "certainly affected" certain things is a little over the top.
The difference in time was about 3 seconds (the time to run the 4th and goal play) so the call didn't affect game time at all. Did it "certainly affect" Navy's playcalling? According to Navy, they call the same plays whether it is 1st and 10 from their 1 or from their 20 yard line. So how can Scott say for sure it affected their playcalling?
I don't even know how he can say it "certainly" affected momentum. Stuffing Utah on the goalline certainly swung momentum in Navy's favor just 3 or 4 seconds after the would be touchback.
I think the DNews should report the error and state possible affects on the game but get rid of the "certainly" stuff.
look out for the band wagon | 10:22 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Just think, the utes had a decent season. Shucks, now I'm going to have to
deal with more closet people who are only Utah fans win they win a game...
To Lou Holtz is ridiculous | 10:23 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
You didn't understand what Lou said. His statement was that Utah was the
most talented non-bcs team, not the #1 non-bcs team, that is obviously Hawaii.
One of the pre-season pubs said the same thing, but still picked them to finish
4th in the conference. It may be true, it may not be, but that is what he said.
In a way it is almost a condemnation of the coaching staff (If you have the
most talent, you should win). Great win. Nobody but BYU and Navy fans will
remember the call, and a win is a win. People whining about it being tainted on
both sides of the argument are lame.
another tainted win | 10:31 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Navy would have won the game if the officials had called that one right. That
bad call put them in a very tough position and they were robbed. Put an aterisk
next to this win for Utah. How embarrassing.
Too late now | 10:37 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Nice of the officials to fess up right after the game, too bad they didn't
get it right during the game. Navy most likely would have won if the right call
was made. This is going to leave a very bitter taste in their mouths and I know
the Utes would feel the same way if had happened to them (can you say lynch
mob?). Yes, put a big old asterisk next to this win.
re: LB | 10:40 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Whatever you say Dr. LB...go back to your own message board. If we wine so much
why are you here? Why do you care? Leave and quit winning about the Ute winners.
In actuality, take a look, using your advanced degrees (which total five years
of grad school) and look over the thread, you will notice that most of the
crying it is coming from cougartown.
Ummm Some More | 10:44 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
The rulebook also states that a player cannot fumble forward while the player is
moving out of bounds. This is part of the rule to prevent the offense from
being able to intentionally fumble forward and recover the ball in the endzone
for a touchdown.
The ball was clearly moving forward.
The ball was clearly moving forward.
No Difference? | 10:45 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
No Duh? Of course the call made a difference. Even if you run the ball,
running from the 20 vs. the 1 yard line is huge. Not to mention the
clock-management issues and the decision to go for it on 4th down. That being
said, good win for the Utes. Poinsettia Bowl Champs 2007. The first of 30+
teams to end their season as champions of something.
Unbelievable | 10:47 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
The refs even used instant replay to review the call and still got it wrong
during the game! I guess they didn't completely understand the rule on this
situation and someone else had to explain it to them later? That one bad call
was vey significant and likely would have changed the final score with Navy
getting the win. Now we'll never know.
RE: Ute Gary | 10:49 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Actually, the PI call was correct. The ball landed near the feet of the DB and
Reciever. The reciever was turned looking back trying to catch the ball,
however, the DB kept going down field. If the DB turns and looks for the ball
he has every right to go after it, however, if he fails to look for the ball and
makes contact like that it a PI call every time. He was in perfect position, he
just failed to turn and look for the ball. A big No No...
Holtz | 10:51 a.m. Dec. 21, 2007
Any unbiased Ute fan has to agree that Lou Holtz's comments really had no
validity. In 2004, Holtz would have been 100% correct. Since then, not even
close. Remember, Utah lost 3 conference games which resulted in a 3rd place
finish in the Mountain West. 3rd place in the "weaker" Mountain West,
but the best non-BCS team? Doesn't make a lot of sense to me Lou. I'm
not saying BYU is the best non-BCS team either (you obviously need to look at
Hawaii, Boise State, and others), but the last two years they have been proven
to be a better team then Utah by going undefeated in conference two straight
years. Boise State last year and Hawaii this year proved to BYU that they are
better because they also went undefeated in their non-conference schedule and
BYU did not. Next time Lou Holtz makes a statement like that, he needs to be
able to back it up.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
Words Remaining
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
Related content
- A president of Europe? 10:18 a.m.
- Riesch edges Vonn in WCup slalom 10:13 a.m.
- Woman killed in S.F. Canyon crash 10:07 a.m.
- Collie featured in Sports Illustrated 10:01 a.m.
- Obama: Put off Fort Hood probe 9:59 a.m.
- Fort Hood victims' funerals Saturday 9:18 a.m.
- Rep. bashes Dems over health care 9:09 a.m.
- Former China ambassador Lilley dies 9:08 a.m.
- Google concedes on digital book deal 9:00 a.m.
- New Zealand reaches World Cup 8:57 a.m.
- Williams leaves, won't play tonight
- Attack meant to kill apostle
- Unga family is making its mark
- Man killed during 3rd I-15 crash
- Trial begins in toddler death
- Short-handed Jazz fly past Sixers
- ESPN suddenly loves MWC
- Can BYU root for (ick) Utah Utes?
- Study: Divorce likely when wife ill
- Bench proves fruitful for Y.
- SLC council OKs gay rights policies
348 - Editorial: Mormons and gay rights199
- Senators want food tax restored162
- Will state consider gay rights law?145
- Letters: Strange breed in Utah129
- Utes remain silent about BCS120
- S.L. vote pending on gay protections113
- Celtics crush Jazz103
- Pratt pleads not guilty to sex charges103
- Hatch empathizes with Muslims89
 |
Basketball Final | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
| 76ers | 32 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 90 | |
| Jazz | 30 | 34 | 28 | 20 | 112 |
As expected, Utah State's game at Weber State in the season opener was a...
Advertisement
Latest comments
A locked gate that a five year old can open is not secure enough for a dog...
"Tang's owner"? What's the individual's name? And how can a little boy...
What For ?
At first I thought this was going to deal with caring about the american...
Womens BB - LOSERS (yes) mens BB - LOSERS (yes)..... and going for the...
"ick" I hope not!
Sounds like a good game to watch. It was suppose to be on B2 TV but were not...
Well, this means that until the end of January, there will be little if any...
I laughed and laughed at this news. All four of my sisters live in the...
The sound of the train brakes as it pegs the odd car or pedestrian won't be a...
Advertisements