Thomas | 7:29 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
I am LDS and Romney has lost my vote, why can't he stick to his beliefs and stand up for them like Huckabee! How do we know what Mitt will do when he changes directions on issues to get elected.

Huckabee could be the man with intregrity in this race!
Alan | 7:37 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Ugh! "Romney's speech must be carefully crafted" says the headline. Then others whine because Romney seems too carefully crafted. He's too open about his faith. He's too guarded about his faith. I've never seen anything like this, where people (especially in the media) are so worked-up over one man's belief. The very same people who are heaping this kind of treatment on Romney would be so incredibly offended if this was done to them or a loved one.

Let the rest of the nation be on trial for a change. How will WE respond to Romney? Will we consider his candidacy with maturity and thought? Will we examine the Mormon faith with fairness and reason? Will we lecture to him about how Christian he isn't? Or will we show our own Christianity by rising above the religious elitism that Christ most often railed against? Will we choose a leader with the "correct" views of God, "acceptable" friends, and "orthodox" beliefs, or one with the experience, character and wisdom for the job? Will we vote with conviction and reason, or with prejudice?

We'll learn more about Romney's beliefs on Thursday, but we'll learn far more about the nation's character afterwards.
David | 8:47 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Good Luck Mitt!!

God Bless!!
Comments continue below
Cjem | 8:58 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
My grandmother was a southern Utah mormon and my grandfather was a midwest protestant. The first time my grandmother went to Iowa to meet the family her mother-in-law kept looking at her in a funny way. My grandfather finally noticed and started laughing, and he told his mother than his new wife had been de-horned. One of my co-workers, a Cathollic, told a similar story about his father. When his father, a southern Nevada native, went to a military base in a southern state for training during WWII, people there expected him to have horns because he was Catholic. When Mitt Romney gives his speech, he probably doesn't need to get much deeper than that he doesn't have horns.
What's the Problem | 9:34 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
If Mitt cannot be upfront an NOT "carefully craft" his speech, I don't want him to be president. I want an openly honest man that can say what he believes without worrying about the crazy religous freaks dissing him -- that is more respectable in my opinion. This is ridiculous...probably old news but it has become so obvious that people really don't want religion and state to act as seperate entities (maybe I am wrong?). Perhaps I am ignorant, but I would hope that people would judge a man on his works and not focus so much on whether he believes in a religous book called the Book of Mormon. I guess that is an unrealistic thought, but I just wanted to vent on how lame this has become.
Too bad, but... | 10:24 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Romney�s real burden is trying to convince Americans that he won�t be controlled by the Church he belongs to. Unlike Catholics who often disagree with their Church without any consequences, many people know that Mormons have no such luxury. Just ask any of the BYU professors who have been fired or excommunicated from the Church because of their disagreements.
Mitt Supporter | 10:51 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Memo to Tom and Other Detractors:

Mitt Romney by any objective measurement is far and away the best candidate currently running bar none. What we need is a president who is principled and holds capitalist and moral values as does Mitt. He has most of the experience necessary. He understands the part he doesn't have experience in the international arena. The democrat detractors will always attempt to tar anyone who does not espouse their leftist/socialist agenda. Mitt will acquit himself well in his speech on Thursday. Anyone who is a principled republican and says they cannot vote for Mitt if and when he becomes the nominee is no republican in my book. Let's stay level headed. It's a longer campaign that normal. We need to stay focused. The other republican candidates all have their flaws. Religon unfortunately is an issue Mitt's oponents/media have raised, and he needs to clarify some apparent misconceptions and distortions not of his making. I am looking forward to hearing what Mett has to say. He is a forthright and articulate speaker and will do well.

I cannot understand why the speech is being held during the morning hours.
Roger | 10:52 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Here are the facts:

1-The Christian base of the Republican Party is hung up on religious-based social issues. They want to government to promote their own religious beliefs. That is why they care so much about things like prayer in school, teaching that �intelligent design� is real science, and banning gay marriage.

2-Mormons send out tens of thousands of missionaries to convert Christians from their religion to Mormonism. This creates the distinct impression that Mormonism and �Christianity� (as they think of it) are at odds.

3-Thus, Christian Republicans who are so bent on integrating their religious views into the government have a real concern about a Mormon president.

Romney�s big mistake was running as a Republican. As a Democrat, he wouldn�t have had to change his position on certain social issues. He wouldn�t need to explain his religion�just state that he believes that church and state should be separate. He wouldn�t even have had to join the NRA.

The outstanding question is whether Utah Republicans will recognize that Romney�s failure should be blamed on the narrow-mindedness of Christian Republicans, or if they�ll make the media the scapegoats.
Milt | 11:04 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Having grown up in the west and now as a long time resident of NH I can tell you that the vast majority of people here are much more concerned about whether a man's church will run him if he becomes President than they are that his beliefs might cause him to try and "Mormonize" this great nation. In numerous town meetings I have attended Mitt has been forthright in telling them that he is not running to be a Mormon President but rather to be a President who happens to be a Mormon and that his first priority will be to renew our great nation and make sure that it remains strong and independent. I can also tell you that Mitt is briliant and that we shouldn't be worrying about how he will make this address; from long personal expoerience I have found Mitt to be capable and ready to handle very difficult situations whenever and whereever they might be.
Josh | 11:13 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
I saw the republican debate and Mitt Romney was not just knowledgeable but sincere and honest in his response. I did not see any well crafted speech at all. He is all about just getting the work done and nothing else. I hope the GOP gives him the chance to "fix the bush mess." His knowledge and moral standards should keep Hillary Clinton from the presidency.

I am from Canada but if I were in the U.S, I'd say that if it's not Mitt, then Americans might as well just vote for a globally and economically "friendly" person like Hillary. Her husband would definitely play a big part in her presidency and he obviously was one of the best Presidents you guys have even had - EXCEPT FOR THE MONICA PART.

David | 11:32 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Mitt needs to answer some important questions that stem directly from his position as a leader inside Mormonism. How does the racist doctrine of Black men not being able to hold the priesthood fit in with his beliefs? Does he still hold that somehow such a racist belief was inspired of God?

I am concerned how he answers that question. Not because he is a Mormon, but because of how such a belief may affect his policy decisions in leading the country. Last I heard is that the policy was done away with in 1978, however the underlying belief and racist actions still are in place.

I want to know what Mitt will do when his beliefs contradict science. How will he let his beliefs determine his policy decisions? Will he seek to imprison women who choose to have an abortion in the first trimester if his wish to have a constitutional amendment banning abortion happens?

I am interested not in Mitt's choice to believe what he wants no matter what I think of it. I am interested in knowing how those beliefs affect his decision and policy making capacities as the leader of the US.
doubting paul | 11:57 a.m. Dec. 5, 2007
If you don't like us, that's OK. We still like you. But please, leave Mormon doctrine to those that really know and have it in context, instead of the Ed Decker way of making sure everything is distorted.

Mitt needs to address only that he is a LDS Man who is running for President. We already have a prophet - and it's not him.
Mitt is John Kerry | 12:07 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
I think that even if Mitt does deliver a watered-down, cheap rip-off speech of Kennedy's, he still doesn't stand a chance. He's the "John Kerry of the Republican Party," with more flip-flops than a fish on dry land.
"Fraud Believer!" | 12:08 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
When are Huckabee, Obama and the balance of the presidential canditates going to give thier JFK Speeches? I thought the constitution said that there will be no religious test for citizens? All of a sudden it appears that not only is there a religious test but, now those who don't believe the same way as us "Fraud" believers can forget public civility and open discourse.

Yes, Mormons are a peculiar people who to one degree or another, have a faith system that outsiders might not understand or agree with. But why is that a bad thing? Wasn't this whole continent at least partially settled by individuals seeking religious freedom? I am a believer. I also allow others the same freedom. So, does a particular personal faith disqualify someone from running for office?

What does "Enough Said" mean?
deseretnews.com moderator | 1:13 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Please stay on topic: Mitt Romney's speech.
Mitt for President!!! | 1:14 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Mitt will deliver a fantastic speech that will take him to the White House! Mitt epitomizes the 13th Article of Faith. His wife and sons are tremendous examples of integrity and it would be marvelous to have them as the first wholesome family in the White House. Mitt doesn't need to take all this abuse that is thrown at him. He could enjoy a happy carefree life if he wanted, but he knows this country is in a real mess and he knows that he can fix it. His sons know that if anyone can fix it, it is him. They support him wholeheartedly and so do I. Mitt to the White House!!!
Mitt for President!!! | 1:23 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Here is where you can watch the speech:

The speech will take place at 10:30am Eastern at the George Bush Presidential Library in College Station, Texas. You may watch the entire speech live on MittRomney.com.

slmg | 1:27 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Why is everyone so amazed, surprised, offended etc. That the media and the American People are so intrested in what Mitt Romney's religious beliefs are? Romney had to know that by running for the presidency that he was not only putting himself but the entire LDS Church and it's doctrine in the spotlight. Love it or hate it, the questions and opinions are not going to stop coming, we LDS are considered pecular people and that is not going to change. People are not so afraid that Romney will be influnced by Salt Lake, it is simply his being a Mormon that scares them.
John Swenson Harvey | 1:29 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Roger got it correct. The Republican party (at the national level as well as here in Utah) is being driven by a small religious minority that wants to impose their views on the larger population through the force of law. Since Mormons have views that are at odds with most of that religious minority, that minority doesn't like the idea of putting a Mormon in charge of imposing their beliefs on the rest of the country. Hence Mitt must convince them he will do their dirty work *in spite of* his personal beliefs.

In addition to that mess, Mitt also has the problem that he has turned his back on his own beliefs multiple times during this election cycle. Saying he isn't going to the temple, and agreeing that every word of the Bible is true. Basically he is paying more attention to the opinions of man, than those of God.

I doubt he could ever get the nomination due to the first problem, and even if he did I wouldn't want a person who has so callously betrayed his "core" beliefs to be the President.
Behold the Condemnation | 2:28 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
I think I like the Idea of Mitt making this speech, even though there will be people who will try to use it against him from every angle.

Re: John & Thomas & others

Thanks for passing down your judgement of Bro. Romneys unworthyness. Statements like "turned his back on his own beliefs" and "can't stick to his beliefs" are hypocritacal and reflect ignorance in regards to Mitt Romney and the doctorines and official positions of the LDS church.

You are not the people he should address in his speech, because your condemnation is personal. the people he should address are the ones who like the canidate Mitt Romney but have reservations about the Mormon Mitt Romney. He should assure them that he considers the Constitution a sacred document and that principles of faith guide his personal actions but that he alone will guide the country.
Different types | 4:20 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
These postings support the long-held perception that there are different types of Mormons.

The worthy and the unworthy.

And to be quite frank, some of the "worthy Mormons are starting to resemble what you might call an Aryan sort of attitude that is not very likeable.
Mahonri | 8:33 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Maybe he should take a long hard look at Gordon Hinckleys interviews and then he can stand up and declare that he isn't quite sure what he really believes... but is is probably good anyhow.
Ed Clinch | 10:04 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
Interesting historical notes:

Joseph Smith himself was a presidential candidate and killed as such, a few months before the 1844 election.

He was anti-slavery and some of the mob resented him for that, I hear. At least many Missouri thugs...

Reed Smoot was the first Utah Senator, about 100 years ago. Latter-day Saints have been a strong fixture of DC ever since. Including Willard Marriott. Enjoy your night's sleep!

The evangelical movement has evolved a bit over time, and sometimes they seem a bit hostile to me. But we all believe that Christ is King, abortion is wrong except for reasons of danger to the mother or extenuating circumstances, and men should marry women and be faithful to them.

May the best man or woman win a year from now, for all of our sakes.

I am LDS from birth, my parents joined in 1968.

Grateful for it every day of life, as I am for being American, a citizen of the best nation to defend freedom in the world.

Peace and Happy Holidays, all.
Ed Clinch | 10:19 p.m. Dec. 5, 2007
One last thing:

Gordon B. Hinckley is a prophet of God, and people make fun of all prophets in all times. I'm used to that.

Doesn't make it right.

A spokesperson of God deserves some special attention and respect, as do pastors and evangelists...

Best of wishes. And God bless you.
Steve | 12:30 p.m. Dec. 6, 2007
Mitt gave a great speech this morning.

Add your comment

Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.

Words Remaining

E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.

Image
Ted Powers, Associated Press

In a speech critical to his presidential campaign, John F. Kennedy addresses the Houston Ministerial Association on Sept. 12, 1960.

previousnext

Latest comments

I'm glad the democrats are against making someone prove the are a US citizen...

Y., U. to learn bowl destinations

A BYU VS USC Vegas bowl. Since I have spent the last 8 months living in So....

Todd: Meaning that I stick by them like a true fan. If thats the case then...

Editorial: Iran up to old tricks

political power by provoking others. The holocaust never happened, Iran...

Dear Mr. Forrest: You forgot one important thing: 26-23. You lost all...

I can’t understand why BYU teams aren’t universally known as the...

Four elements out of a 2100 page bill: That's some realistic polling. A...

BYU 26-utah 23. Utah state = after thought.

I'm not worried about your first admendment rights. But I sure wish you would...

Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing

What's dumb about the title to this article is that Glenn Beck doesn't speak...

Advertisements