Reader comments
Boosting ranks of teachers
45 comments | Read story
How slow are the people on this committee?
I asked a couple of teachers about this year round deal. Everyone of them basically said, "I can't take teaching year round. I have to have some time without having a kid in my face. If I had to work year round I would LEAVE THE PROFESSION!"
Now I know that will trigger some, "I work year round so they should too" comments but it isn't the same. We will have more teacher burnout and even less people in the profession if this were to happen.
Most teachers would love to work year round as long as some of that summer time doesn't involve students and the worries that come with them.
In fact I think the LDS seminary teachers started doing this a while back. They work in the summer and get paid for setting up the curriculum for the coming year.
The committee members really need to get a clue!
It won't. It will just be seen as one more reason not to come work here.
Let's face it Sen. Stephenson. The way to attract more teachers here is to pay more than other states for the same work.
I know that is hard for our legislators to come to grips with. They keep saying, "lets find some creative ways to improve education."
We don't need creativity. We just have to bite the bullet and actually pay them more. From what I have seen a $15,000 a year raise for beginning teachers should pretty much take care of the problem.
We have the money. We have the need. Let's put the money where the need is.
Is that so hard to figure out? It is what the public says they want time after time. Yet the legislators STILL don't get it.
JUST PAY THEM MORE AND THEY WILL COME!
Just so you know, as I'm a teacher I do get almost three months off, but I am not paid for it, so how is it a vacation like other jobs? I actually get three days of personal leave each year, plus sick leave. As for preparation days, teachers teach the kids longer every day to make up for the time they don't get paid for on prep day. There are a lot of misunderstandings out there about the actual benefits of the teaching profession. As for the high benefits, we'd better receive it or at least half of the teachers, including me, would quit. These benefits help make up for our poor pay and difficult job demands. We are also losing a lot of our good benefits because of monetary issues.
Even on the 9 month program, teacher burn-out is a huge issue. There are many high-stress elements to teaching and the loads teachers have here in Utah adds to that.
I have talked to many teachers about the concept of "year-round" employment and the vast majority do not want to participate. Most feel worn-down and stressed with just nine months of employment. Most want "recovery" time. Most feel they would be far less effective if they had to teach year-round.
I think the better way to keep teachers and attract new teachers is to address the conditions of teaching here in Utah. Lower class sizes are needed as well as an increase in support staff and funds for supplies. I would extend contracts slightly to require additional planning times and trainings.
I think giving teachers a 10-month contract with better conditions and built-in planning and training times and allowing them the other two months to rejuvenate would be far more effective in keeping and attracting teachers.
So to make the argument that teachers should teach year-round is politically unsustainable because of parents.
On paper, the three semester system looks great. Parents would choose two out of the three semesters for their children to attend. Teachers would teach all three semesters. But most of the parents I talked to would want to choose the fall and spring semesters and NOT the summer.
So, not only are the majority of teachers against the year-round system because of burn-out concerns, but the majority of parents are also against such a dramatic change to their family schedules.
If a vote (not referendum, please) would be conducted, I sure the Utah communities would vote "no" on year-round schools.
Good luck with that "no interest in getting a teaching certificate" thing. No teacher was excited about it, but I'll bet if you poll your friends who are teachers, 98% would suggest you don't try it without it.
Regarding year round for the same pay as teachers teachinging out of state: teaching that ten months is not a marathon, it is a sprint. You use the restroom every 50 minutes and it is hurried, you eat in 35 minutes, you have to be on top of what 30+ children are doing bell to bell, and the bell rings and 30+ more walk in.
What I am saying is there are not alot of easy answers. I suggest the Legislators ask teachers what they think would help us prevent a teacher shortage instead of running in with their own agendas just to say they tried.
Good Luck Though
As a teacher I'd rather have more pay period. I don't want to teach extra to increase my salary, I have other jobs to compensate my income already that are a "break from teaching."
Yes, working with other people's children is rewarding but difficult. Year round teaching will just bring more teacher burnout. I taught summer school for several years and after a while it wore me out emotionally. My verve picked up when I took a break to do something else. Teachers should get 20% raises based on what they teach now.
Regarding Merit Pay. Does that mean if I'm lucky to have AP students and they do well, I get more pay? Should my Physics teacher that teaches 15 kids per class get more pay than I do since I teach Government with 40 kids and Physics is deemed "more important"? Is my merit pay based on test results so I should hope that I teach in an affluent school with no ESL students?
"We need highly qualified people in classrooms who will really teach and inspire these kids to seek careers in those fields � it takes someone with real passion to inspire them to go into math and science fields,"
With one important change though:
"We need highly qualified parents in the home who will really teach and inspire these kids to seek careers in those fields � it takes someone with real passion to inspire them to go into math and science fields,"
The weakness in our school system is not in the
school it is in the home.
Yes I am a school teacher.
Teachers have NO power in the school system. They must teach to that giant stack of standardized tests given each year.
Teachers must teach and inspire every student who walks through the door. This may number 40 or more. They may vary from non-readers to Sterling Scholars to students released from jail just yesterday.
Did you do know that special education students must now take standardized tests at their calendar age and grade? Never mind that they may be non-readers or reading at a 3rd or 4th grade level. Very inspiring!
Aren't parents supposed to do anything? Like get their kids to school on time, see that they do their homework, insist that they behave in class, get them to bed by 9 or 10!
Aren't students responsible for any part of their own learning?
Wishy, washy legislature.
Crazy thinking at the State Department of Education.
District administrators who think that taxpayer money is their own. District administrators who, without skill, unashamedly micromanage schools.
So, you think money is the only problem?
So, you have a teacher shortage?
Can't imagine that.
No Child Left Behind is an onerous program that requires significant inroads into teaching time through required testing.
More difficulty in keeping a teaching certificate as mothers leave the profession to pursue family goals. Some would come back but their license has expired - and they need twice as much recertification credit at their own expense.
No raises every year the budget is tight. I think I counted five years without raises at the end of my teaching experience.
The Legislature has supported moves to support three school systems - charter schools, public schools and school vouchers at times when there wasn't money to support one school system.
More lumping in of funds into one fund, putting pressure on districts to redistribute money away from teachers and towards other critical needs. This has made it easier for the legislature to "we gave teachers 5% (thru increase of the wpu) but never reached the pockets of the teahcers.
That isn't entirely true. We have more candidates in elementary than positions available. Either they aren't being hired (principals do the hiring) or they are opting to leave the profession.
This year Granite finished hiring before the school year started and Alpine had over 100 candidates they didn't hire. Jordan was where they traditionally are with hiring at the beginning of the school year. All three districts could not fill Special education. They had some openings in the Sciences and Math in secondary as well.
We have a 'critical area' of teacher shortage, and have always had that is Special education.
I would not recommend teaching as a profession to anyone. I graduated in 2001 hearing about shortages, and feeling that I would not go through periods of unemployment and I would have my choice of jobs. I interviewed at a school that had over 500 candidates when it opened---Daybreak in South Jordan. The field is quite competitive.
I would gladly take an 'extended' contract if I ever were to be offered it. Administrators just don't like offering them because it takes a whole grade usually to make it work.
1. Raise pay
2. Get rid of tenure.
I would like to add a third.
3. Realize that little certificate does not mean you are a great teacher. I have seen several districts hire competent individuals that have never before taken education classes. Those who have passion for their particular profession can motivate students like no other. One of the best science/math teachers I have seen did not have a certificate but did have many years in the field as a Petroleum Engineer.
If we want to improve the quality of teachers, we need to improve the supply. When there's greater choice, the highest quality is hired. When there's not much of a choice, they hire what they can get.
It all comes down to making the teaching profession attractive so we can be picky about who teaches in our classrooms.
Please fired them all and start over again.
I had to:
1) Pass all of their core curriculum with a C or better (for me this included classes full of pre-med and pre-dental students)
2) Pass various backround checks just to be considered for the University's teaching program
3) Once admitted to the program, I had to take 2-3 semesters of classes geared toward the "touchy-feely" part of teaching
4) Pay for and pass a national test that deemed me "highly competent" in science, apparently passing grades were not enough.
5) Pay for and pass ANOTHER national test that deems you "highly competent" in classroom management skills
6) And now for 3 years I will be checked up on by administrators, who will one day find that I am a teacher worth having at their school.
I love teaching. But I wish national and state legislatures would stop making it harder and harder to get a teaching degree.
The only reason I stay in education is, I do love teaching.
But if you average the pay increase and the reduction of benefits I have averaged about a 3% pay deduction every year. Last year was the first year we did not get a reduction in health care insurance in 4 years.
I have not even factored in the cost of living. The pay raises are not even close to keeping up with inflation when we lose benefits, I know we will lose insurance benefits this year.
This makes teaching an attractive career, I have no idea why we are having a hard time finding and retaining teachers?
I agree with the writer who said that teachers should be able to freely transfer from district to district without being penalized for experience. School districts really don't want the more experienced folks. They don't want to pay for an experienced teacher when they can hire two new college grads that will teach for a couple of years and then leave to raise a family. Districts say they want to retain teachers, but that is lip service only. Money is the only thing that really matters to districts - not quality teachers.
I have a BS in biology & chemistry, and a master's degree too. I also have 20 years of teaching experience.
There is a lot more to being a competent science teacher than merely possessing a master's degree. You may know the science, you may do fine in a college classroom, but those classes in pedagogy, educational psychology and classroom management make the differenced between a good scientist and a good science teacher. Folks like you who wnat into the classroom without the instructional foundation are the first to quit when the going gets tough.
On another note, starting pay for a 9-month contract, BS/BA degree is about $29,000. Next door in Wyoming, starting pay is $43,000. There is no income tax in Wyoming. Will Sen. Stephenson help us compete with that?
That sacred ratio of students to teachers is 24.875, average for a school.
More or less, and the principal and district juggle teachers and classes until it fits.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Transactions 5:40 p.m.
- Civil suit in teen's death will proceed 5:35 p.m.
- Wisconsin upsets Maryland 5:33 p.m.
- Hearing set for accused teen shooter 5:23 p.m.
- Students on the job front 5:22 p.m.
- ATP finals: Davydenko beats Nadal 5:22 p.m.
- Report: Iverson set to retire 5:20 p.m.
- Principal leaves giant imprint 5:12 p.m.
- 13-13-13 = oodles of laughs 5:12 p.m.
- Crews free man in Utah County cave 5:05 p.m.
- Donny and Kym dance to victory
- Howard made the rivalry a rivalry
- Crews free man in Utah County cave
- Cougars cruise past Southern
- Loyal to Cougarettes, Crimson Line
- Twitterati to BCS: 'We hate you.'
- Y. focused on 10-win season
- BYU has slim shot at BCS
- Witness describes '99 killing
- Thunder rolls by Jazz
- BYU would like friendlier rivalry
258 - Glenn Beck to enter politics?
226 - Protests against Phoenix LDS temple
205 - RSL wins MLS Cup on penalty kicks
202 - Bronco, Kyle rubber match
139 - BYU records with win
133 - Letters: Rushing to judge Palin
129 - Hall, Johnson matchup key
102 - Boys basketball rankings
101 - Thunder rolls by Jazz
100
To What? I don't see the primary market as the individual. The data...
at basketball.
"To whomever poured beer on Matt Bauman: you are pathetic."...
still the best...
no way is judge ranked lower than juan diego...we beat them in the summer...
I cannot find even one source on the internet that lists Utah even in the top...
To Jaime, You're correct. Sorry. I really enjoyed Mr. Weyland's book...
Again with the, "now we're playing with emotion" and "now we're leading as...
This guy is truly "bad news". BUT, the headline is unfair to the urgent care...
"To my U friends" I am not your friend and I never will be...



Anyway, what I mean is, well, this could be viewed as a good thing.
Thank you and have a nice day.