Reader comments
Could charter schools privatize?
20 comments | Read story
Then throw in that while this voucher maxs at $3,000 per student, the anticipated average is around $2,000.
So if a charter school did convert they would be starting over again from a logisitical point of view and then they would be cutting their operating revenue by almost 60%.
Functionally, it won't happen.
Charter schools have proven to increase student performance, a perfect barometer for what more private schools can do for Utah. Public schools are a failure when one looks at their experience in the business of educating, funding, and resources. People need to wake up and stop viewing them as a sacred cow.
The only problem with charter schools is that they are run by a few parents and mistreat employees. In fact, charter schools need more competition as well!
Let's move to privatize education, then we'll see some truthful improvements!
My neighbor who had been sending his kids to Challenger jumped at the chance to enter his kids into a charter school. What a boon it was. Save enormous amounts of tuition and still get that elitist private school experience for his kids (which he has basically stated as such). And of course once he got one kid past the lottery, the rest were given priority and followed. I know, I know, I could do the same for my kids, but the elementary school they go to is the top-rated elementary school in the Alpine School District and there really isn't any reason to send them elsewhere.
Vouchers aren't a bad thing. They're just bad in their current state. I would vote for a voucher that required certification, accreditation and respected Utah's constitutional prohibition of publicly funded religious instruction. The current voucher law fails those tests and has to be discarded.
Charter schools are what they are, just like district schools. Some are wonderful. Some are dreadful. That's the nature of things.
A benefit of the dichotomy between charter and district schools is competition - true competition on an equal playing field.
School choice exists. District schools have an obligation to become the schools of choice. If charter schools and district schools choose to feed off one another's success, we get a continually raising of the bar and an ongoing improvement in excellence.
First, terminate tenure, but retain due process/cause contracts for teachers.
Second, terminate the SAU..a waste of money. Empower the district school principal.
Third, have multiple accrediting authorities.
Fourth, Approve vouchers-competiton with public schools continued funding without the students..this is a great deal for them.
Fifth, only allow legal residents into the public school.
Private schools should have NO government interference/regulation. The problem with public schools is government, hence the word, "Private."
Vouchers are scholarships for families, not paid to schools. The parents choose.
Parents know what is best for their kids, not the State. Why would any Republican ever think otherwise. If so, that person should be a democrat.
My classroom at OCS last year had as diverse a class as one could get in Utah. I had a third minority, a third special ed but and one multilingual (ESL) student. As a school we had a twenty-five percent poverty rate, but we also had a few millionaires.
This isn't a non-article either. I am glad it was written because this has been discussed. With more facts out it seems unlikely any board will jump save maybe to open a second school privately, and that is a great thing.
Your proposal is replete with flaws. Tenure should not be done away with, but should be earned because it protects academic freedom. It currently seems to easy to obtain tenure. It should take a national certification or something along those lines to get tenure not just years of service.
Superintendents are critical in each district, and multiple accrediting authorities already exist.
Vouchers are flawed legislation as they lack standards for education and achievement.
Disallowing children into school for any reason other than expulsion is one of the worst ideas I have read. It would also likely be illegal at either the state or federal level. And how would you go about finding out who was legal and who wasn't? Many kids are citizens but the parents are not.
Private schools need more regulations. They should only use licensed teachers and be accredited by some agency.
Vouchers are flawed.
Parents aren't perfect.
The Republican party has left its roots and core values going in the direction of big government programs such as vouchers. They in a sense became liberal. I am a staunch conservative and I firmly oppose liberalizing private schools with vouchers.
Charter schools are a huge benefit to public education. They reduce class size in the district schools, they follow states rules, certified teachers, and they have incredible parental involvement, etc.
I am happy to be a charter school parent. The voucher debate would be non-existent if we could build more publicly-funded charter schools. (Law currently limits to 5 charters approved in Utah each year. This should at least be changed to 15 or so or the limit eliminated.)
Until this changes, I will continue to vote Democrat in Utah. Utah Republicans have lost their way. (Examples: ReAL Salt Lake Stadium, Transit funding priorities, vouchers, public ed, the list goes on and on.) They are completely out of touch with their constituents.
Thank you.
UR could have said they were Elmer Fudd. Just because they said it, doesn't make them Elmer Fudd.
2. Supts. are not needed and the amount of paperwork is absurd. This is simply more red tape and money NOT spent in the classroom. Capable principals can manage each school with their own staff. The SAU is simply a creation of the social democrats, another waste of taxpying dollars.
3. This is the most outlandish liberal statement so far. Private schools are excellent and they do so with accountability to parents and academic results. I'll take this over your government "standards for achievement" anytime.
4. If you're not a Legal Resident, you have no business recieving taxpaying dollars. How can you be against vouchers due to "public money" yet favor taxpayers to fund illegal residents?
5. Vouchers are inherently far more constitutional than a federal system of education.
6. Parents are far more capable of making the right decisions for their kids than the State.
7. The only "big government" program is the public school system that, in many cases, is the biggest employer.
Which constitution are you talking about? Federal leaves education to the state constitutions.
He said nothing about giving money to Illegal residents he said �how do you go about determining who is and who is not. (recommend you watch 12 Angry Men again, great communistic movie)
You also have not been in a school, because your argument about parents knowing best does not last through a day or dealing with them. I am assuming you�re a parent by your comments also.
(By the way your spell check did not pick up some of your grammatical mistakes and homophones a good public education teacher would have caught them but you did not listen when you were in school, and you do not listen now.)
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Curlers have a passion for icy sport 5:46 p.m.
- Outdoor notes 5:40 p.m.
- T-giving races: Help others, yourself 5:30 p.m.
- Collinsworth signs with BYU hoops 5:07 p.m.
- D-Will will start against Celtics 5:03 p.m.
- Temperatures to drop, snow possible 4:46 p.m.
- Police: men threatened Orem officer 4:40 p.m.
- Art of medicine can require delays 4:34 p.m.
- Release dying dog from senior work 4:34 p.m.
- 'Evenings at the Museum' Friday 4:33 p.m.
- SLC council OKs gay rights policies
- Utah Jazz have a problem at point
- 'Love story' of crash victim ends
- BYU football recruit turning heads
- 12 Utes return to Texas
- Prep football: Felt's Facts Week
- Alta's Ohai is Ms. Soccer 2009
- Civilians help S.L. officer make arrest
- Wyoming writer amazed by BYU
- Cougars' defensive hoops clinic
- House passes health care bill
274 - SLC council OKs gay rights policies
228 - TCU showdown has big implications
192 - Senators want food tax restored
157 - Cougars crush hapless Cowboys
155 - Utah Jazz fall apart against Kings
131 - TCU 4th in AP poll; U. 16th, Y. 22nd
119 - S.L. vote pending on gay protections
109 - No 'backlash' for pioneers, gays analogy
108 - Pratt pleads not guilty to sex charges
98
This week, I'm compiling my annual list of restaurants serving...
Fluke? are you kidding me? Dont be saying it was a fluke. you scored on the...
Isn't any good.
Obama honoring veterans is like chickens honoring Col. Sanders!
You may think people hating RSL is funny, but nobody is laughing about tax...
I have known Sue for many years and have found her to be one of the best...
Again, look at the number of comments and compare with other stories. Utah...
re: Onside Kick | 1:27 p.m. Nov. 9, 2009 Lest you forget; The mouth on...
In consequence of evils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of...
Didnt the BYU fans say that i mean at the beginning of the year it was all we...
Nice job Boylen I am glad your our coach and want to put the UTES back on the...

