Reader comments
Church issues apology for massacre
274 comments | Read story
I learned of the MMM while walking on the lawn of the courthouse in Harrison, AR and read a very one-sided (and non-lds veiw) on the MMM monument. Then across the street I found an Arkansas History book, that, after looking up the story in it, I felt very comfortable with the LDS's stand on the massacre. Why all of this hate. Are we not all people with similar goals, live good lives and return with honor to our heavenly home?
In my earlier comment, I suggested that you refrain from offering opinions on this subject until you have studied the data. You have not given any indication that you have studied the data I provided a link to. I again invite you to study the historical documentation before you ignorantly call someone a "religious bigot."
I suggest that you clear your mind of what you have been taught to believe in Sunday School and seminary, and study the actual history from the words and deeds of the participants.
Another general comment: Apostle Eyring's remarks today did not constitute a sincere apology. A sincere and complete apology involves accepting responsibility for wrongful actions. Eyring continued to place the blame for the MMM on "local Mormons," just as Gordon B. Hinckley and other deceitful LDS leaders have done ever since the incident occurred. (Hinckley refused to admit institutional responsibility for the MMM on the advice of church lawyers who feared lawsuits for reparations by the massacre victims' descendants.)
Of course, LDS leaders also refuse to admit that official church policies led to the massacre because that would destroy the church's self-proclaimed status as the "one true church of Jesus Christ," and their claims of having a "prophet" who receives guidance from God.
I think it's hypocritical that LDS church leaders often preach to their disciples about the "repentance process," while those leaders are not willing to undergo the "repentance process" for wrongs committed by their church as an institution.
Those who don't learn from history truly are destined to repeat it.
2. I have been to the MMM site, it is very clean and very much out of the way, kind of hard to find. Let the church give it back, and then all of you that are in support of that, go back in five years or ten and see the overgrown weeds, the vandalized area, the broken fences and fallen rocks. That is what will happen, there will be no staff or money that will go into maintaining that area if it is federal land, but now it is maintained and kept.
3. Events like MMM are part of our history, just like six years ago, but we have to move on, watching today the people was kind of sad, they are acting like what happened six years ago was six days ago, and those who hold anger over what happened 150 year ago, act like it was six days ago.
4. Question, how many of you that are wanting an apology and to have the church give up the site are actual descendants of the victims or are you Mormon haters?
This notion that the LDS church has never acknowledged the fact that local Mormon leaders were complicit in this event, until today, is baloney.
I have journals and church publications going back 100 years which clearly does acknowledge the Mormons involvement.
The straw-man arguments put forth by the anti's here is just laughable.
These "nattering nabobs of negativism" won't be satisfied until they can implicate Brigham Young and thus the Church itself.
Why? because, then it's payday. How many times have we heard "reparations" in this thread.
Why don't you anti's get off your talking points.
We know what you're up to and so does the church.
The animosity and rancor toward the Church is evident. You have no spirit of reconciliation, and you want to blame those who are blameless. That makes you liars. Why should anyone deal with you, when you come to the table with those attitudes?
The book coming forth is researched by
"True Historians" with PhD's behind their names, not by two-bit pseudo historians, like Will Bagley, Sandra Tanner and John Voight.
Read :
http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=509
Until then, save your comments, because you don't have enough debth of understanding to even put forth an opinion.
You cannot dismiss undeniable facts as "utah myths", and concoct, make up, take statements out of time and place, place people in places they were not and misquote speeches, to the point, that you leave antithetical impressions of what was actually stated.
Your big shot at re-writing history, has failed.
September Dawn has done 1 million dollars, and half the theaters have dropped it.
The producers spent 11 million on this "Goebells propoganda" and needs to make 22 million for the studios to break even, nice investment.
You've had your day, now move on.
blokey
Amen! Perhaps there is hope for the future of the church. It's interesting to note that there are so many posts that regard progressive thought as "anti-mormon" or "jack mormon." To face the facts and call out the ban on the priesthood for what it was is certainly not an anti-mormon act. If anything, such progressive ideas, will keep the church afloat. The church is now at an important cross roads. Eyring's public apology marks a significant shift in public PR church policy. Perhaps now the doors can be open for more apologies and more progressive thought. The members all need an apology. As far as I can tell, the majority of active members typically offer the church leadership (both local and general) undying faithfulness and support. Such faithfulness should not be abused. Church leaders need to recognize the importance for individual thought. Why, even Dallin H. Oaks might agree that if more individual thought was exercised and encouraged, perhaps tragedies like the MMM wouldn't happen. Perhaps if we were more open about the real church history, we as a people never would have stood for such a ridiculous policy like a ban on the priesthood.
Other things that need to happen if the church is going to survive:
1. Open the church historical archives (sorry, Boyd, but this has got to happen). If the church is true, what is there to hide?
2. Make financial records public (sorry apostles, but "humble" servants do not need to be given 100,000$+ a year, and the prophet certainly doesn't need 500,000$+ a year. The only reason these records aren't public is because the leadership doesn't trust the members.
Ahhh....what I would give to still be a young BYU student in love with FARMS reviews. Well....one day you're going to wake up, just like I did, and realize just how ridiculous and one-sided FARMS is. Don't worry, you'll come around. And, by the way, Jon Voight is an actor, not a historian, and he doesn't spell his name with an "h."
Lets all just follow Christs example and teachings and love one another. We should all be thankful that we live in a great country that we can be free. Let us remember the losses from 9/11 and be greatful for our men and women that fight for our freedom.
The LDS church is sorry. Please forgive those who did this act 150 years ago.
On another note the Church has no political preference. I have friends that are very prominent in the LDS Church and the State of Utah that are staunch Democrats just FYI.
I believe that it is time for all of us to love each other today. Respect each other today. Let each other worship according to the dictates of thier own conscience and allow all others the same privilage.
Have a great day!
A few more thoughts; Don't murder people who come through your state.Don't hate your neighbors for what thier 150 year old relatives may have done.
And were sun screen.
Enjoy your upcoming visit with Hillary!
I don't hate the church. I love the church, and I recognize that the church is as every bit my church as it is your church, or Boyd's, or Dallin's...
Anyway,
all you need to do (other be sure to spell things correctly) is a simple google search for the prophet's and current apostles' salaries, and you'll find a variety of different sources that all generally agree that the prophet makes about 500,000$ a year, and the apostles make about 100,00$ a year. Unauthorized church employees have posted such information on the Internet. As a member who has busted my own rear end my whole life serving the church for free--including a two year mission that the church didn't pay for--I feel that the salary that the leaders give themselves is a bit much. I think it's healthy to express disagreements when they happen. If we don't keep ourselves in check, you never know, another MMM might happen.
Read it again.
I spoke the truth according to the LDS doctrine and teachings.
If you think what I said was wrong, then you are either anti-mormon, or don't follow your prophets.
Too many members blindly follow whatever the church leaders say. Too many followers feel that someone is anti-mormon or going apostate when all they're really doing is thinking for themselves.
Wake up everybody; it's okay to be a member of the church and think for yourself! If you're in church and you hear something that doesn't sound quite right, then maybe it isn't right. Think for yourselves. You don't have to blindly follow whatever you hear the first presidency say. Everyone can receive personal revelation
What do you mean church historical records are not open to the general membership? I thought they were open and we could see everything. If they are closed, it certainly looks like they're hiding something.
Mountain Meadows Massacre was a horrible thing that happened. Horrible things are happening all around us. My hope would be that we can all, no matter what religion or country we hail from, no matter what has happened in the past, that we can work together to make today better than yesterday. Have we learned from history? Maybe some of us have. But the tone of these comments doesn't seem to be pointing to a better outcome than MMM.
I just know that in my little corner of the world--which at this time happens to be a beautiful spot in Europe--I'm going to look for the best in others,be the best I can be, and teach my children to do what is right. If we all did the same, the world would be a better place. Trite but true. Or would "tried and true" be more appropriate. (Check out 4th Nephi)
The church must step forward and do the right thing in every situation, past or present, right away.
I totally agree with you. There is no way I would ever want to be prophet--it's just too much work. If it was up to me, I would increase all their salaries to at least a billion dollars a year, even Boyd's.
The main point I was trying to make, wasn't that I feel their salaries are too high, it's just that it's a little disturbing to know they don't want anyone (especially the members) to know how much they make. Honestly, they deserve every penny. They sacrifice and give up a lot. But as leaders, they need to give the members a little bit of credit and trust us. Distrust does not breed faith. I bet even Dallin might agree with that.
The exact phrase "profound regret" is not considered legally binding. The words "sorry" or "apologize" are. If the Church used either of these words the MMM descendants (and probably other claimants) could and would sue the Church for literally hundreds of millions of dollars. And they would win.
The State of Illinois backed down from "apology" to "regret" in the very same way a few years ago when addressing the abuses and murders inflicted on the Church in the 1840's. Same reason for using (and avoiding) the same terms.
The Church's main source of revenue to run itself is tithing, which is a very large sacrifice by its members and in many cases it truly is the widow's mite. The Church is NOT going to expose the deep financial sacrifices of its faithful members to this level of legal risk.
Nearly all active Mormons I know are basically good people and do feel very sorry for what happened to the victims that terrible day. But it also would not be right to give their descendants and their lawyers hundreds of millions of dollars for it and run the Church into bankruptcy. Thank our wonderful US legal system for the wording used -- not the Church.
True, it is unlikely that anyone off the streets can just walk into an organization's head office and request to view historical documents. But the church denying general membership--a membership that pays 10% of their income to the church--access to historical records? That is a bit strange. If the church employs a lay ministry, what right do the leaders have to keep information from the members? Common sense seems to say that all interested parties should have equal access to the records. I agree with most of the others: What are the church leaders trying to hide? Surely they aren't worrying that the Tanners would write another book based on newly released records. No one cares about the Tanners. No one reads their garbage. It seems like they're worried the general membership might find out something they don't want them to.
I cannot and will not apologize for actions of somebody who lived 150 years ago. Whiners, complainers, and yes that includes some of you LDS members need to quit crying over spilt milk.
Only they who were there really know what happened and why. Even their writings will not reveal all, nor record all. May they rest in peace.
Add your comment
Comments are monitored. Any comments found to be abusive, offensive, off-topic, misrepresentative, more than 200 words or containing URLs will not be posted.
E-mail address: For internal use only. We may want to contact you to publish your comment (not your e-mail address) in the newspaper or for a separate story idea.
- Kirilenko sits, Miles improves 11:35 p.m.
- Texas survives huge Husker scare 11:34 p.m.
- Photos: Disability outreach 11:24 p.m.
- The forgotten ship: USS Utah 11:01 p.m.
- Tiger's SUV, personal life are a wreck 11:00 p.m.
- Utahns want health care reform bills 10:57 p.m.
- 20 years ago this week 10:52 p.m.
- Wildcats win conference road opener 10:51 p.m.
- Oden hurt, done for season? 10:50 p.m.
- Vonn gets 2nd win at World Cup 10:49 p.m.
- Why is Y. ignoring spew of hatred?
309 - Letters: Liberal because LDS
247 - Y. profs: Beck not all-knowing
195 - 2 citations issued at Y.-U. game
189 - Hate not limited to 1 in-state rivalry
189 - Aggies shoot past Cougars
179 - N.Y. Senate rejects gay marriage
128 - Unbeaten BYU takes trip to Logan
105 - George lost in rivalry hatefest
104 - Harpring's NBA career is over
94
Trolley Square's annual Holiday Open House will feature visits with...
That does it — I'm having an affair! Thanks to Tiger Woods, David...
First, a big thank you to all who posted questions here for me to ask...
Gretkey's question is a good one---I am missing your point.
14 to usc and OSU. BYU and Utah will find out again that a middle of the...
tonight's game? Duh.
Funny thing how these vocational skills are saving a lot of people money in...
I guess you didn't see Tai slide his hip into the Saint Marys Player as he...
sloan always admits the error when it is too late..
injured players come back, look for bad chemistry and more losses. As is...
The Jazz won't win every game, but they should have won this one. How many...
I am done for the night, I have vented enough. Of the 4 games next week if...
OK so I am an idiot! With that being said will someone in Utah tell me (there...


