What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
- Charges: Runaway teen caused accident that...
- Family at first sight: Girl with Down...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
37 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
32 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
21 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14






It should be noted that the current 1997 master plan had designated 9850N as the East/West corridor through Highland, and has been so for many years, with considerable tax money having been used to secure the right of way, with the road already partially built. Earlier this year 9850N was taken off the city's draft 2007 master plan, and replaced with 9600N. Only due to residents showing up at a city council meeting was 9850N placed back on the 2007 draft master plan. No explanation has been offered to date as to why these major changes where made in the draft 2007 plan without public input or knowledge. However when the word had got out on this change, many residents were rightly concerned. Questions remain un-answered, and residents have a right to know what precipitated the change in plan. If its too early in the planning process to say 9600N will be a main east/west corridor, as per Mr Edwards and Mr Seager, how can any proposed changes in the city's 2007 master plan designating 9600N as the choice of road for future consideration in any way of be supported by any factual data
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments