Reader comments
An ethics probe needed
6 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In Opinion
Across Site
- Jay Evensen: On second thought...
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Michael Gerson: Egypt's craziness is...
- George F. Will: Is it bribery or just...
- Mackenzie Eaglen: Obama's proposed...
In Opinion
Across Site
- Robert Bennett: A brokered...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Protecting...
- Charles Krauthammer: The Gospel...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The...
- In our opinion: New nuclear plants...
- Evangelicals and Mormons: Can we talk?
- Readers' forum: Price of freedom
- My view: The climate is right to tear...
- Readers' forum: A changing Constitution
- Readers' forum: No nuclear waste in Utah
In Opinion
Across Site
- Letters: Bush's failed policies
53 - Letters: A changing Constitution
45 - Editorial: Rights of conscience
40 - Letters: Teachers not overpaid
32 - Editorial: New nuclear plants
32 - Letters: Home equity loans
28 - The Gospel according to Obama
27 - Letters: Rights of conscience
26 - GOP no longer leads on defense
24 - Tear down the wall of discrimination
21












This issue has now been reviewed twice, and in both cases it has been acknowledged that no laws were broken, and that no policies were violated. What is left is simply a bad taste in ones mouth. So now we need to do more probing to find what the other two found?
One note on Mr Christensen, while he stated something to the affect that he 'was under tremendous pressure' he later recanted on that, and admitted that it was a simple two or three sentence conversation. The most basic explanation is that he did so, thought very little of it, told the legislators that the GOP would not need to pay, and then when the pressure hit he has gone over the top to blame the legislators.
And to think the Democrats wouldn't get a float built is pretty weak. If what we are dealing with is a desire by the college to please people, some of the most respected people around are the Democrats. They would have gotten a yes, other than the Democrats haven't even bothered since Nancy Jane Woodside ran the Utah County party.
In short, move on to the next subject. It has been reviewed twice. Are we hoping that with a third and fourth, then fifth something will turn up? Enough is known already to tighten up policies and if felt to do so tighten up legislation. The Deseret News is waising time with this. They should stop whinning, which this editorial does, and proposed the changes they want. And then write to editorials espousing those changes.
Until then, they are just whinning and adding nothing to good government. We know what happened. Now tighten up the reins of government.
This is why I say it leaves an unpleasant taste, and no doubt a good policy or two could be written to ensure no more casual convesations of this nature take place.
With what has been given thus far, that is the next step. And if the Deseret News is going to opine about it, fine. Let them also serve some good and suggest something that would prevent this in the future. The absence of this tells me that they like to whine, not solve.
It makes me wonder how much additional money has been wasted to gain favor with others. The Gov needs to throw the bums out - send a message to these clowns that they can�t waste public dollars.
If he thinks he was "under tremendous pressure to get the (float) project done," he should think of the tremendous pressure that he will face in prison.