Comments about ‘Bear Lake Monster resurfaces anew’
Recent 'sighting' gives new fins to 168-year-old tale
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Cottonwood High School football coach Josh...
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Mortgage rates at historic lows as home...
- Dangerous silence: Why you need to talk to...
- Cathy Free: Free Lunch: Zero, nada, zilch on...
- Four people killed in plane crash in Kane...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
27 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
24 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
20 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
13 - Man shot brother while showing him...
13 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
13






I am curious to see a reference for this alleged 1888 report in which Rich supposedly said that he made up the monster story. As I recall, he gave himself credit for "discovering and making famous by publication in the Deseret News that wonderful first-class lie- the Bear Lake Monster", but to "discover" something implies that it already existed in some form prior to awareness, and is not the same thing as to invent or make something up. Just because Rich himself didn't believe in the monster doesn't mean that it therefore never existed. It is highly likely that Rich heard tales from the Shoshoni in the area and from other settlers as well, and used those tales to generate excitement in the valley (goodness knows there's not much else to do there during the long, grim winters; I know, I grew up there). He certainly succeeded in making the stories famous, however, and he definitely deserves credit for that.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments