Comments about ‘Are short lunches bad for children?’
Experts say more dining time vital for kids' health
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Utah
- Gail Miller gets engaged to Salt Lake attorney
- New president to lead Mormon Tabernacle Choir
- Top 30 elementary schools in Utah by test scores
- Bottom 30 elementary schools in Utah by test...
- Jon Huntsman Jr. is done pulling punches
- Plane crash victims identified
- Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
- Family at first sight: Girl with Down...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Utah
- Make it a small: N.Y.'s ban on large...
38 - Glenn Beck unleashes his dogs of war
32 - Cottonwood High School football coach...
25 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
21 - Utah woman adopted as baby faces...
18 - Vets heart Mitt: Romney enjoys big...
17 - Idaho awaits No Child Left Behind waiver
14 - Rep. Jim Matheson favors getting rid of...
14






Im doing a little speach about this subject and i have found out lunches can range from 10 minutes up to 45 min. even up to an hour at a couple places. I think rushing the lunch is a bad idea for the benfit of the students. 45 min. sounds great to me since my high school only and a 30 min lunch
WE ONLY HAVE 20 MINUETES FOR LUNCH
My middle/high school's lunch period is only 20 min. But some people don't even have lunch, they just eat an ice cream bar or a cookie. I think that we should have at least 30 min. to eat lunch.
DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments