Reader comments
House passes major energy-climate bill
89 comments | Read story
Get today's headlines via email
Afternoon edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Thakoon's collection: red leather,...
- Grammys honor Houston, celebrate...
- Carmen Marc Valvo's Fashion Week...
- Induced labor allows dying Texas man...
- Diane von Furstenberg at NY Fashion Week
- Grammys to honor Whitney Houston,...
- Greece passes new austerity deal amid...
- New president of the Maldives expands...
- At Doo.Ri, a focus on the complete woman
- Venezuela's opposition chooses...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Whitney Houston, superstar of...
- Romney adds to delegate lead with...
- White House didn't foresee birth...
- View live stream of services for...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Romney edges Santorum in...
- Romney may be in danger in Michigan...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
In News
Across Site
- Gay rights and religious liberty
90 - Obama revamps birth control policy
80 - Santorum sweeps caucuses
48 - Obama to change birth control policy
28 - Romney in trouble in Mich., beyond?
25 - Obama attempts to calm the waters
23 - Boehner: Congress to overturn birth...
21 - Maine: Romney wins caucuses
19 - Powell told son he had 'surprise'
18 - GOP electorate still holding out
17







this bill will create new jobs in new fields related to cleaner energy production, maybe conservation.
it's not about flag waving
Matheson already voted against Barrys scam and tax bill in committee, so make sure to contact him today to remind him to vote against it again. If passed, it will become the most expensive tax increase in American history and affect everyone, particularly lower income individuals. It will also seriously stifle any type of economic recovery.
In an interview in 2008 with the San Francisco Chronicle, Senator Obama said that electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket under his plan to fight global warming. He also said that under his plan, if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; its just that it will bankrupt them.
By the way, someone might want to inform Barry that the earth is actually cooling.
Contact Matheson
Washington D.C.: Phone - (202) 225-3011
Toll-Free: 1 (877) 677-9743
This is a good start for everyone on the planet. (Even the loud-mouthed SUV, ATV, rip-up the environment, greedy, greedy, ranters from these pages)
Even scientists say this won't change the global climate trends, but we want to do it anyway. Politicians just feel the need to do SOMETHING or they will be blamed for EVERYTHING.
It doesn't hurt that a bunch of their friends (Al Gore and Company) will benefit greatly from this pseudo-tax forced to be tacked onto the prices of EVERYTHING we use or do from now on, till the end of our days. It doesn't really matter that it will have no impact on Global Climate.
So much for President Obama's promise not to raise taxes for anyone making less than $250,000/year. It's undeniable that this is anything other than a stealthy-tax on EVERYTHING and EVERYONE.
B Hussein said he was going to bankrupt the coal industry and now he is doing it. The Dems talk about creating new jobs - why do they fail to mention the jobs they are killing? The answer - they are self serving.
This is more socialism. From everything I've read about this bill there is a concensus that higher energy costs will result. How is this justified? Lower income households will have credits and rebates to help pay for their energy. What does that mean? Their neigbors who are already paying more taxes are now going to pay for their energy costs. More redistribution of wealth. Aweful policy. Socialism doesn't work - look at Cuba, look at S. Korea vs N. Korea, look at Hong Kong vs Red China. Why is China's economy growing so fast? They are starting to impliment capitalism.
If you looked at the satellite temperature data you would see the temperature increasing until 1998, when it peaked and slowly began to decline.
No year since then has even come close to being as hot as 1998, and the global temperature for the past two years is virtually unchanged from what it was 20 years ago.
This is not unprecedented; since 1850 the earth's temperature climbed until it peaked during the 1930's and then slowly declined, bottoming out in the mid-1970s (the time when most scientists believed we were headed for another ice age).
Since the 1970's it has increased but since peaking in 1998 it appears to be on the decline again. This despite the fact that carbon dioxide emissions have accelerated during the past 50 years.
If you don't like them, then, don't vote for them in 2010 and re-elect them again.
That's about all you can do anyway.
So passage of this bill must have some other agenda, which isn't hard to see. Any bill that makes such a huge transfer of power and money has an obvious agenda.
This bill is NOT about air pollution--CO2 is not part of air pollution. It's about transferring money and power, plain and simple.
The most shocking, incredible aspect of this bill is it makes no provision for the biggest, best, most obvious solution to clean electricity--nuclear power. That fact in itself speaks volumes about the origins and motivations of this bill.