Reader comments
Utah high court ends dad's parental rights
5 comments | Read story
Huh | 3:02 p.m. May 29, 2009
This makes little to no sense. Try again.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Surrogate what rights? | 3:17 p.m. May 29, 2009
I don't understand why the Surrogate mother has any rights to the baby she
put up for adoption. I don't know the total details of this story, but if
a baby is legally adopted, the former parents shouldn't have any rights to
visitation or anything else. The parents that adopt the child should be in full
control of the child at that point in my opinion.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
CougarKeith | 3:35 p.m. May 29, 2009
So let me recap? A guy pays a woman to surrigate as a mother. He gets arrested
for fraud and is deported to Canada. The Mother has a criminal history too? She
puts the kid up for adoption and the Worthingtons get the kid, then the Father
wants the kid, but he is denied? Then the real mother ends up with visitation,
but Anthony, the kid, gets to stay with the adoption parents in the US after a
two day trial in which they win custody and have had custody because that was
"The Best Temporary Place" for him? Is this what it all boiled down
too? Because honestly the reporting on this story sounded like a Chinese Fire
Drill! It was like a Soap Opera without making one bit of sense unless you read
it 5 times, and I did, and I still am not sure I got it straight??? If the kid
isn't confused I sure am!!!
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Anonymous | 6:58 p.m. May 29, 2009
Well, the mother has rights because her rights can not be terminated (and no she
is not a criminal), and because her relinquishments were legally flawed. FYI,
she also pays child support for her son. I don't think the word
"surrogate" applies at all at this point in time.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Is it or isn't it? | 5:43 a.m. May 30, 2009
So if the mother has to pay child support then why doesn't the father? Or
does he? And child services has once again found a way to garner child support
for their personal greed. I think the court was wrong in this decision and set
this poor kid up for a life of confusion and disbelief, so child services could
garner some funds from one or both parents. The judge has walked the line on who
is responsible for the child, the parents, or the ones wanting to adopt the
child, or child services. With so many custodial adults for this child who will
it call mom and dad? It is a Chinese fire drill.
Recommend
Recommendations: 0
Get today's headlines via email
Good morning edition
Deseret News Family Deals
In News
Across Site
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- Woman charged in Rasmussen death...
- Photos: Salt Lake Main Library...
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Amendments to gutted sex education...
- Requests to alter online news...
- Salt Lake City celebrates 2002...
- 'Wicked' tickets on sale May 11
- Sweethearts in real life also share...
- Despite data, Lyme disease sufferers...
In News
Across Site
- Powells, Coxes put differences aside...
- Colliding causes: Gay rights and...
- View live stream of services for...
- Focus returns to Powell children today
- Battling misconceptions: Faced with...
- Father-in-law dragged deeper into...
- Romney's 'Horrible Tuesday' signals...
- Josh Powell had 'incestuous' images...
- LDS bishop ordered to stand trial for...
- Missing plane found in Morgan County,...
In News
Across Site
- Prop. 8 declared unconstitutional
181 - LDS Church, others respond to Prop 8
87 - Families at odds over Powell's actions
54 - Gay rights and religious liberty
41 - LDS bishop ordered to stand trial
41 - Utah House blocks Sandstrom bill
39 - Powell call:'I'm afraid for their lives'
33 - Photos: Year of the Dragon
26 - Bill would cut auto safety checks
24 - Should SLC bid again for Olympics?
23






